All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qcow2: Document and enforce the QCowL2Meta invariants
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 17:42:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f53af87c-15e3-4de5-42e0-213363759231@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201007115217.18013-1-berto@igalia.com>

07.10.2020 14:52, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> The QCowL2Meta structure is used to store information about a part of
> a write request that touches clusters that need changes in their L2
> entries. This happens with newly-allocated clusters or subclusters.
> 
> This structure has changed a bit since it was first created and its
> current documentation is not quite up-to-date.
> 
> A write request can span a region consisting on a combination of
> clusters of different types, and qcow2_alloc_host_offset() can
> repeatedly call handle_copied() and handle_alloc() to add more
> clusters to the mix as long as they all are contiguous on the image
> file.
> 
> Because of this a write request has a list of QCowL2Meta structures,
> one for each part of the request that needs changes in the L2
> metadata.
> 
> Each one of them spans nb_clusters and has two copy-on-write regions
> located immediately before and after the middle region that that part
> of the write request touches. Even when those regions themselves are
> empty their offsets must be correct because they are used to know the
> location of the middle region.
> 
> This was not always the case but it is not a problem anymore
> because the only two places where QCowL2Meta structures are created
> (calculate_l2_meta() and qcow2_co_truncate()) ensure that the
> copy-on-write regions are correctly defined, and so do assertions like
> the ones in perform_cow().
> 
> The conditional initialization of the 'written_to' variable is
> therefore unnecessary and is removed by this patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
> ---
>   block/qcow2.h         | 19 +++++++++++--------
>   block/qcow2-cluster.c |  5 +++--
>   block/qcow2.c         | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>   3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/qcow2.h b/block/qcow2.h
> index 125ea9679b..2e0272a7b8 100644
> --- a/block/qcow2.h
> +++ b/block/qcow2.h
> @@ -435,17 +435,18 @@ typedef struct Qcow2COWRegion {
>   
>   /**
>    * Describes an in-flight (part of a) write request that writes to clusters
> - * that are not referenced in their L2 table yet.
> + * that need to have their L2 table entries updated (because they are
> + * newly allocated or need changes in their L2 bitmaps)
>    */
>   typedef struct QCowL2Meta
>   {
> -    /** Guest offset of the first newly allocated cluster */
> +    /** Guest offset of the first updated cluster */
>       uint64_t offset;
>   
> -    /** Host offset of the first newly allocated cluster */
> +    /** Host offset of the first updated cluster */
>       uint64_t alloc_offset;
>   
> -    /** Number of newly allocated clusters */
> +    /** Number of updated clusters */
>       int nb_clusters;
>   
>       /** Do not free the old clusters */
> @@ -458,14 +459,16 @@ typedef struct QCowL2Meta
>       CoQueue dependent_requests;
>   
>       /**
> -     * The COW Region between the start of the first allocated cluster and the
> -     * area the guest actually writes to.
> +     * The COW Region immediately before the area the guest actually
> +     * writes to. This (part of the) write request starts at
> +     * cow_start.offset + cow_start.nb_bytes.

"starts at" is a bit misleading.. As here is not guest offset, not host offset,
but offset relative to QCowL2Meta.offset

>        */
>       Qcow2COWRegion cow_start;
>   
>       /**
> -     * The COW Region between the area the guest actually writes to and the
> -     * end of the last allocated cluster.
> +     * The COW Region immediately after the area the guest actually
> +     * writes to. This (part of the) write request ends at cow_end.offset

same here

> +     * (which must always be set even when cow_end.nb_bytes is 0).
>        */
>       Qcow2COWRegion cow_end;
>   
> diff --git a/block/qcow2-cluster.c b/block/qcow2-cluster.c
> index aa87d3e99b..485b4cb92e 100644
> --- a/block/qcow2-cluster.c
> +++ b/block/qcow2-cluster.c
> @@ -1049,6 +1049,8 @@ int qcow2_alloc_cluster_link_l2(BlockDriverState *bs, QCowL2Meta *m)
>       qcow2_cache_entry_mark_dirty(s->l2_table_cache, l2_slice);
>   
>       assert(l2_index + m->nb_clusters <= s->l2_slice_size);
> +    assert(m->cow_end.offset + m->cow_end.nb_bytes <=
> +           m->nb_clusters << s->cluster_bits);

should we also assert that cow_end.offset + cow_end.nb_bytes is not zero?

>       for (i = 0; i < m->nb_clusters; i++) {
>           uint64_t offset = cluster_offset + ((uint64_t)i << s->cluster_bits);
>           /* if two concurrent writes happen to the same unallocated cluster
> @@ -1070,8 +1072,7 @@ int qcow2_alloc_cluster_link_l2(BlockDriverState *bs, QCowL2Meta *m)
>           if (has_subclusters(s) && !m->prealloc) {
>               uint64_t l2_bitmap = get_l2_bitmap(s, l2_slice, l2_index + i);
>               unsigned written_from = m->cow_start.offset;
> -            unsigned written_to = m->cow_end.offset + m->cow_end.nb_bytes ?:
> -                m->nb_clusters << s->cluster_bits;
> +            unsigned written_to = m->cow_end.offset + m->cow_end.nb_bytes;
>               int first_sc, last_sc;
>               /* Narrow written_from and written_to down to the current cluster */
>               written_from = MAX(written_from, i << s->cluster_bits);
> diff --git a/block/qcow2.c b/block/qcow2.c
> index b05512718c..e7b27fdf25 100644
> --- a/block/qcow2.c
> +++ b/block/qcow2.c
> @@ -2361,15 +2361,26 @@ static bool merge_cow(uint64_t offset, unsigned bytes,
>               continue;
>           }
>   
> -        /* The data (middle) region must be immediately after the
> -         * start region */
> +        /*
> +         * The write request should start immediately after the first
> +         * COW region. This does not always happen because the area
> +         * touched by the request can be larger than the one defined
> +         * by @m (a single request can span an area consisting of a
> +         * mix of previously unallocated and allocated clusters, that
> +         * is why @l2meta is a list).
> +         */
>           if (l2meta_cow_start(m) + m->cow_start.nb_bytes != offset) {
> +            /* In this case the request starts before this region */
> +            assert(offset < l2meta_cow_start(m));
> +            assert(m->cow_start.nb_bytes == 0);
>               continue;
>           }
>   
> -        /* The end region must be immediately after the data (middle)
> -         * region */
> +        /* The write request should end immediately before the second
> +         * COW region (see above for why it does not always happen) */
>           if (m->offset + m->cow_end.offset != offset + bytes) {
> +            assert(offset + bytes > m->offset + m->cow_end.offset);
> +            assert(m->cow_end.nb_bytes == 0);
>               continue;
>           }


Then it's interesting, why not to merge if we have this zero-length cow region? What's the problem with it?

So, maybe we can write instead of these two ifs:

If (!m->cow_start.nb_bytes && !m->cow_end.nb_bytes) {
    /* No cow regions */
    continue;
}

if (m->cow_start.nb_bytes) {
   assert(l2meta_cow_start(m) + m->cow_start.nb_bytes == offset)
}

if (m->cow_end.nb_bytes) {
   assert(m->offset + m->cow_end.offset != offset + bytes);
}

But it may be done in separate.

I'm not really good in l2meta list related things, but patch seems OK to me:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-07 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-07 11:52 [PATCH] qcow2: Document and enforce the QCowL2Meta invariants Alberto Garcia
2020-10-07 14:34 ` Eric Blake
2020-10-07 14:42 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2020-10-07 15:38   ` Alberto Garcia
2020-10-07 15:47     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-10-07 16:03       ` Alberto Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f53af87c-15e3-4de5-42e0-213363759231@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=berto@igalia.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.