From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=gmills@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47tNDY3xTFzDqMM for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 08:49:00 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 008LlVT6026218 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 16:48:57 -0500 Received: from ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (b.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.11]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xdg1byhkd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 16:48:57 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 008Lj6vl029736 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 21:48:56 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.17]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2xajb7t531-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:48:56 +0000 Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.237]) by b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 008LmtRQ49349034 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 21:48:55 GMT Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10D7C6059 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 21:48:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1B2C605B for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 21:48:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.102.58.210] (unknown [9.102.58.210]) by b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 21:48:53 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: Moving the WebUI to Vue; Repo vs Branch From: Gunnar Mills To: "openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" References: <60d44fed-74e2-70e3-e91f-ae1289d1700f@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 15:48:52 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <60d44fed-74e2-70e3-e91f-ae1289d1700f@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------7FCEBD5C8D649EE336934255" Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-08_06:2020-01-08, 2020-01-08 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-2001080171 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:49:02 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------7FCEBD5C8D649EE336934255 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Just following back up on this after the holidays. :) On 12/18/2019 10:00 AM, Gunnar Mills wrote: > > Hi All, > > This is a follow on to previous discussions of moving the GUI away > from AngularJS and to a new framework, Vue, that was discussed on the > list and in the GUI design workgroup meeting. > > See: > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2019-September/018299.html > https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/wiki/GUI-Design-work-group > > The team here had some questions about Vue and wanted to answer some > of our and the community concerns about moving to Vue, so over the > last few weeks, our team has spent time working on a Vue prototype. If > you are interested, https://github.com/gtmills/phosphor-webui-vue > > This prototype has a few working panels and builds with the current > webui recipe, > https://github.com/gtmills/openbmc/commit/de6e2daef54fa5ace473a42b9ff9014cc9cb02ba > > IBM is committed to moving the WebUI to Vue. > Is anyone opposed to moving to Vue? > > Should this work be done in a separate repo? > > Or a separate branch in phosphor-webui, that would be merged into the > master branch once this Vue rewrite becomes functionally equivalent to > the current AngularJS application? > > Would anyone stay on the current AngularJS application? > > We plan to maintain the current AngularJS application until the Vue > rewrite becomes functionally equivalent, would anyone maintain the > AngularJS application after such a time? > > I think a new repository is the safest bet here. Anyone opposed to a new repo for the webui vue rewrite? Possible names: webui webui-v2 phosphor-webui-v2 phosphor-webui-vue webui-vue --------------7FCEBD5C8D649EE336934255 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Just following back up on this after the holidays. :)

On 12/18/2019 10:00 AM, Gunnar Mills wrote:

Hi All,

This is a follow on to previous discussions of moving the GUI away from AngularJS and to a new framework, Vue, that was discussed on the list and in the GUI design workgroup meeting.

See:
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2019-September/018299.html
https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/wiki/GUI-Design-work-group

The team here had some questions about Vue and wanted to answer some of our and the community concerns about moving to Vue, so over the last few weeks, our team has spent time working on a Vue prototype. If you are interested, https://github.com/gtmills/phosphor-webui-vue

This prototype has a few working panels and builds with the current webui recipe, https://github.com/gtmills/openbmc/commit/de6e2daef54fa5ace473a42b9ff9014cc9cb02ba

IBM is committed to moving the WebUI to Vue.
Is anyone opposed to moving to Vue?

Should this work be done in a separate repo?

Or a separate branch in phosphor-webui, that would be merged into the master branch once this Vue rewrite becomes functionally equivalent to the current AngularJS application?

Would anyone stay on the current AngularJS application?

We plan to maintain the current AngularJS application until the Vue rewrite becomes functionally equivalent, would anyone maintain the AngularJS application after such a time?



I think a new repository is the safest bet here.
Anyone opposed to a new repo for the webui vue rewrite?

Possible names:
webui
webui-v2
phosphor-webui-v2
phosphor-webui-vue
webui-vue

--------------7FCEBD5C8D649EE336934255--