From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227A0C00140 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 06:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232118AbiHHGPV (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2022 02:15:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52178 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230520AbiHHGPU (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2022 02:15:20 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B717426D2 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 23:15:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1659939319; x=1691475319; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=myj3gVPJm7KgJFeb/MDO+zYSOE6m0is7hb9SC6rQMD8=; b=Vak3lS0P4MVqeKjqYKuiRWfqivmSKd/C8+y7fWdNZJExPhRkw1QFHCoA sa4f7/UTS91I/dMK2lGT2Me+FeJPgvrubMFeC9IHbKsE/HWYGaRjzzpUH 11a9pjyNsWXXVGNKwaLH3fFQgxBgwIycuVw6SILHF57MwMFfo1K2H/+ce AXQUil/BHduvVi4IFUL93FPy9G9fMYgKeNm0+GHVq/QD//PEI1j8NAaoO e7/h8CboHEF+tlC18SHNjdYGIMS41c4YxQVGfi0906HaHSd5JqS2ApjUX dvz2LlWe49KLf0l1QX3zttQ3HeiGWLIGWjJ7jrqOff/3DdWAXUJM88cVk w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10432"; a="270287130" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,221,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="270287130" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2022 23:15:19 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,221,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="663794199" Received: from rongch2-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.215.109]) ([10.254.215.109]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2022 23:15:17 -0700 Subject: Re: Fwd: warning: stable kernel rule is not satisfied To: Greg KH Cc: Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, lkp References: <2364552d-9b18-875a-484a-d54ee8b9b9ee@intel.com> From: "Chen, Rong A" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:15:15 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On 8/8/2022 2:02 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 10:51:08AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >> Hi Greg, Sasha, >> >> Sorry to bother you, this is kernel test robot, we have sent some >> reports related to the stable kernel rule, do you want to receive such >> report? or any suggestion for us to improve it, or disable it? > > Yes, can you respond with the same subject line as the original email, > to make it obvious what this is referring to? Much like your other > emails for when a submission breaks the build. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Hi Greg, Thanks for your reply, we'll update the report subject to point to the original mail. Best Regards, Rong Chen