From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F193771BE for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id w56E2w3D004058 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 6 Jun 2018 15:02:59 +0100 Message-ID: From: Richard Purdie To: Matt Hoosier Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 15:02:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20180525134537.27659-1-matt.hoosier@gmail.com> <03bb3ecd46e56bc21799d56f723bc01d966230c8.camel@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.1-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.4 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] fetch/gitsm: avoid live submodule fetching during unpack() X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 14:03:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 08:36 -0500, Matt Hoosier wrote: > Okay, I'll see what's going on with that. I'm still interested to > know if there's a listing of all the various automated regimens that > are used as CI before accepting Bitbake/Poky patches -- I don't want > to keep wasting the maintainers' time with failures that I could have > uncovered independently. The test matrix is basically encoded into: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/yocto-autobuilder-helper/tree/config.json run across the various autobuilder workers on https://autobuilder.yocto .io/buildslaves, i.e. centos7, debian8, debian9, fedora26, fedora27, opensuse423, opensuse tumbleweed, ubuntu 1604 and ubuntu 1704 I'm not sure its reasonable to expect everyone to test across all those combinations! > Any comments on the aims and overall technique of this change? So far > all I've really gotten back are copy/pastes of automated builder > failures. I strongly believe we should only have network access in do_fetch and that our source mirroring should be functional and I therefore very much support what the patch is doing and appreciate this getting fixed. Sorry for the terse nature of the replies, we're just seeing a lot of patches which are breaking the regression tests and its hard to root cause them back to the underlying patches and help people debug them. I do appreciate the help in getting this issue fixed as it will be a good improvement to the fetcher. Cheers, Richard