From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A2DC43217 for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 14:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237010AbiEIOSL (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2022 10:18:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37058 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236931AbiEIOSJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2022 10:18:09 -0400 Received: from fanzine2.igalia.com (fanzine.igalia.com [178.60.130.6]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA012216056; Mon, 9 May 2022 07:14:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=igalia.com; s=20170329; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=21Vuf08H7s2roER44d4b0UgJl5trrJFyPVjW1sFjFZE=; b=ruDiqyoExl2jG8ttjj8Kva7F0Z 0gmy1ZjUnSZw1kESJcz3XDyEnMdDBnsUYP/IGGe7AdFcEsabz8oUBo80VtrFGlI8cQnzWF9UlpBBK 4aFG0PgEAjxrGpxgz2rOXDVYxrjQeGb+FiM0Mo8j9WOU5B7iKslK22FH7g8xu7/o+vhoBdIcLeTVq TXR8EZtHjX3vb/+hbwrFc/UcTSPrqLuaLvGSeO7jUEfo1fKsk4NXM02lMULpMgFIGTd5/R8izOFMK smJXU8ctgfXKSVE5XSrKVK5cDdrQAjusLpX81WYReyDmurYDvxkw6DQoXAKa1dqFr5Ui2vHbk0ezv WsObUf8Q==; Received: from [177.183.162.244] (helo=[192.168.0.5]) by fanzine2.igalia.com with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128) (Exim) id 1no48z-000Acu-NN; Mon, 09 May 2022 16:13:50 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 11:13:17 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/30] alpha: Clean-up the panic notifier code Content-Language: en-US To: Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , rth@gcc.gnu.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, bhe@redhat.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, rcu@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com, kernel@gpiccoli.net, halves@canonical.com, fabiomirmar@gmail.com, alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, bp@alien8.de, corbet@lwn.net, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, dyoung@redhat.com, feng.tang@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mikelley@microsoft.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com, jgross@suse.com, john.ogness@linutronix.de, keescook@chromium.org, luto@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, tglx@linutronix.de, vgoyal@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, will@kernel.org References: <20220427224924.592546-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com> <20220427224924.592546-11-gpiccoli@igalia.com> From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" In-Reply-To: <20220427224924.592546-11-gpiccoli@igalia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org On 27/04/2022 19:49, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > The alpha panic notifier has some code issues, not following > the conventions of other notifiers. Also, it might halt the > machine but still it is set to run as early as possible, which > doesn't seem to be a good idea. > > This patch cleans the code, and set the notifier to run as the > latest, following the same approach other architectures are doing. > Also, we remove the unnecessary include of a header already > included indirectly. > > Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky > Cc: Matt Turner > Cc: Richard Henderson > Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli > --- > arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c | 36 +++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > index b4fbbba30aa2..d88bdf852753 100644 > --- a/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > @@ -41,19 +41,11 @@ > #include > #include > #endif > -#include > #include > #include > #include > #include > > -static int alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *, unsigned long, void *); > -static struct notifier_block alpha_panic_block = { > - alpha_panic_event, > - NULL, > - INT_MAX /* try to do it first */ > -}; > - > #include > #include > #include > @@ -435,6 +427,21 @@ static const struct sysrq_key_op srm_sysrq_reboot_op = { > }; > #endif > > +static int alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this, > + unsigned long event, void *ptr) > +{ > + /* If we are using SRM and serial console, just hard halt here. */ > + if (alpha_using_srm && srmcons_output) > + __halt(); > + > + return NOTIFY_DONE; > +} > + > +static struct notifier_block alpha_panic_block = { > + .notifier_call = alpha_panic_event, > + .priority = INT_MIN, /* may not return, do it last */ > +}; > + > void __init > setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > { > @@ -1427,19 +1434,6 @@ const struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op = { > .show = show_cpuinfo, > }; > > - > -static int > -alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void *ptr) > -{ > -#if 1 > - /* FIXME FIXME FIXME */ > - /* If we are using SRM and serial console, just hard halt here. */ > - if (alpha_using_srm && srmcons_output) > - __halt(); > -#endif > - return NOTIFY_DONE; > -} > - > static __init int add_pcspkr(void) > { > struct platform_device *pd; Hi folks, I'm updating Richard's email and re-sending the V1, any reviews are greatly appreciated! Cheers, Guilherme From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B63F9C433F5 for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 14:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KxjqT3C3hz3cFB for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 00:15:01 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20170329 header.b=ruDiqyoE; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=igalia.com (client-ip=178.60.130.6; helo=fanzine2.igalia.com; envelope-from=gpiccoli@igalia.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20170329 header.b=ruDiqyoE; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from fanzine2.igalia.com (fanzine.igalia.com [178.60.130.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Kxjpj3bF5z2x9X for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 00:14:18 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=igalia.com; s=20170329; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=21Vuf08H7s2roER44d4b0UgJl5trrJFyPVjW1sFjFZE=; b=ruDiqyoExl2jG8ttjj8Kva7F0Z 0gmy1ZjUnSZw1kESJcz3XDyEnMdDBnsUYP/IGGe7AdFcEsabz8oUBo80VtrFGlI8cQnzWF9UlpBBK 4aFG0PgEAjxrGpxgz2rOXDVYxrjQeGb+FiM0Mo8j9WOU5B7iKslK22FH7g8xu7/o+vhoBdIcLeTVq TXR8EZtHjX3vb/+hbwrFc/UcTSPrqLuaLvGSeO7jUEfo1fKsk4NXM02lMULpMgFIGTd5/R8izOFMK smJXU8ctgfXKSVE5XSrKVK5cDdrQAjusLpX81WYReyDmurYDvxkw6DQoXAKa1dqFr5Ui2vHbk0ezv WsObUf8Q==; Received: from [177.183.162.244] (helo=[192.168.0.5]) by fanzine2.igalia.com with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128) (Exim) id 1no48z-000Acu-NN; Mon, 09 May 2022 16:13:50 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 11:13:17 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/30] alpha: Clean-up the panic notifier code Content-Language: en-US To: Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , rth@gcc.gnu.org References: <20220427224924.592546-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com> <20220427224924.592546-11-gpiccoli@igalia.com> From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" In-Reply-To: <20220427224924.592546-11-gpiccoli@igalia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, halves@canonical.com, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, peterz@infradead.org, alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, feng.tang@intel.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, mikelley@microsoft.com, john.ogness@linutronix.de, bhe@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, paulmck@kernel.org, fabiomirmar@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, dyoung@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, pmladek@suse.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, keescook@chromium.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, jgross@suse.com, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel@gpiccoli.net, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, senozhatsky@chromium.org, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 27/04/2022 19:49, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > The alpha panic notifier has some code issues, not following > the conventions of other notifiers. Also, it might halt the > machine but still it is set to run as early as possible, which > doesn't seem to be a good idea. > > This patch cleans the code, and set the notifier to run as the > latest, following the same approach other architectures are doing. > Also, we remove the unnecessary include of a header already > included indirectly. > > Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky > Cc: Matt Turner > Cc: Richard Henderson > Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli > --- > arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c | 36 +++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > index b4fbbba30aa2..d88bdf852753 100644 > --- a/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > @@ -41,19 +41,11 @@ > #include > #include > #endif > -#include > #include > #include > #include > #include > > -static int alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *, unsigned long, void *); > -static struct notifier_block alpha_panic_block = { > - alpha_panic_event, > - NULL, > - INT_MAX /* try to do it first */ > -}; > - > #include > #include > #include > @@ -435,6 +427,21 @@ static const struct sysrq_key_op srm_sysrq_reboot_op = { > }; > #endif > > +static int alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this, > + unsigned long event, void *ptr) > +{ > + /* If we are using SRM and serial console, just hard halt here. */ > + if (alpha_using_srm && srmcons_output) > + __halt(); > + > + return NOTIFY_DONE; > +} > + > +static struct notifier_block alpha_panic_block = { > + .notifier_call = alpha_panic_event, > + .priority = INT_MIN, /* may not return, do it last */ > +}; > + > void __init > setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > { > @@ -1427,19 +1434,6 @@ const struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op = { > .show = show_cpuinfo, > }; > > - > -static int > -alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void *ptr) > -{ > -#if 1 > - /* FIXME FIXME FIXME */ > - /* If we are using SRM and serial console, just hard halt here. */ > - if (alpha_using_srm && srmcons_output) > - __halt(); > -#endif > - return NOTIFY_DONE; > -} > - > static __init int add_pcspkr(void) > { > struct platform_device *pd; Hi folks, I'm updating Richard's email and re-sending the V1, any reviews are greatly appreciated! Cheers, Guilherme From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guilherme G. Piccoli Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 11:13:17 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 10/30] alpha: Clean-up the panic notifier code In-Reply-To: <20220427224924.592546-11-gpiccoli@igalia.com> References: <20220427224924.592546-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com> <20220427224924.592546-11-gpiccoli@igalia.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kexec@lists.infradead.org On 27/04/2022 19:49, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > The alpha panic notifier has some code issues, not following > the conventions of other notifiers. Also, it might halt the > machine but still it is set to run as early as possible, which > doesn't seem to be a good idea. > > This patch cleans the code, and set the notifier to run as the > latest, following the same approach other architectures are doing. > Also, we remove the unnecessary include of a header already > included indirectly. > > Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky > Cc: Matt Turner > Cc: Richard Henderson > Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli > --- > arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c | 36 +++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > index b4fbbba30aa2..d88bdf852753 100644 > --- a/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > @@ -41,19 +41,11 @@ > #include > #include > #endif > -#include > #include > #include > #include > #include > > -static int alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *, unsigned long, void *); > -static struct notifier_block alpha_panic_block = { > - alpha_panic_event, > - NULL, > - INT_MAX /* try to do it first */ > -}; > - > #include > #include > #include > @@ -435,6 +427,21 @@ static const struct sysrq_key_op srm_sysrq_reboot_op = { > }; > #endif > > +static int alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this, > + unsigned long event, void *ptr) > +{ > + /* If we are using SRM and serial console, just hard halt here. */ > + if (alpha_using_srm && srmcons_output) > + __halt(); > + > + return NOTIFY_DONE; > +} > + > +static struct notifier_block alpha_panic_block = { > + .notifier_call = alpha_panic_event, > + .priority = INT_MIN, /* may not return, do it last */ > +}; > + > void __init > setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > { > @@ -1427,19 +1434,6 @@ const struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op = { > .show = show_cpuinfo, > }; > > - > -static int > -alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void *ptr) > -{ > -#if 1 > - /* FIXME FIXME FIXME */ > - /* If we are using SRM and serial console, just hard halt here. */ > - if (alpha_using_srm && srmcons_output) > - __halt(); > -#endif > - return NOTIFY_DONE; > -} > - > static __init int add_pcspkr(void) > { > struct platform_device *pd; Hi folks, I'm updating Richard's email and re-sending the V1, any reviews are greatly appreciated! Cheers, Guilherme From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 11:13:17 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/30] alpha: Clean-up the panic notifier code Content-Language: en-US References: <20220427224924.592546-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com> <20220427224924.592546-11-gpiccoli@igalia.com> From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" In-Reply-To: <20220427224924.592546-11-gpiccoli@igalia.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+geert=linux-m68k.org@lists.infradead.org To: Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , rth@gcc.gnu.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, bhe@redhat.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, rcu@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com, kernel@gpiccoli.net, halves@canonical.com, fabiomirmar@gmail.com, alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, bp@alien8.de, corbet@lwn.net, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, dyoung@redhat.com, feng.tang@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mikelley@microsoft.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com, jgross@suse.com, john.ogness@linutronix.de, keescook@chromium.org, luto@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, tglx@linutronix.de, vgoyal@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, will@kernel.org On 27/04/2022 19:49, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > The alpha panic notifier has some code issues, not following > the conventions of other notifiers. Also, it might halt the > machine but still it is set to run as early as possible, which > doesn't seem to be a good idea. > > This patch cleans the code, and set the notifier to run as the > latest, following the same approach other architectures are doing. > Also, we remove the unnecessary include of a header already > included indirectly. > > Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky > Cc: Matt Turner > Cc: Richard Henderson > Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli > --- > arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c | 36 +++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > index b4fbbba30aa2..d88bdf852753 100644 > --- a/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > @@ -41,19 +41,11 @@ > #include > #include > #endif > -#include > #include > #include > #include > #include > > -static int alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *, unsigned long, void *); > -static struct notifier_block alpha_panic_block = { > - alpha_panic_event, > - NULL, > - INT_MAX /* try to do it first */ > -}; > - > #include > #include > #include > @@ -435,6 +427,21 @@ static const struct sysrq_key_op srm_sysrq_reboot_op = { > }; > #endif > > +static int alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this, > + unsigned long event, void *ptr) > +{ > + /* If we are using SRM and serial console, just hard halt here. */ > + if (alpha_using_srm && srmcons_output) > + __halt(); > + > + return NOTIFY_DONE; > +} > + > +static struct notifier_block alpha_panic_block = { > + .notifier_call = alpha_panic_event, > + .priority = INT_MIN, /* may not return, do it last */ > +}; > + > void __init > setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > { > @@ -1427,19 +1434,6 @@ const struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op = { > .show = show_cpuinfo, > }; > > - > -static int > -alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void *ptr) > -{ > -#if 1 > - /* FIXME FIXME FIXME */ > - /* If we are using SRM and serial console, just hard halt here. */ > - if (alpha_using_srm && srmcons_output) > - __halt(); > -#endif > - return NOTIFY_DONE; > -} > - > static __init int add_pcspkr(void) > { > struct platform_device *pd; Hi folks, I'm updating Richard's email and re-sending the V1, any reviews are greatly appreciated! Cheers, Guilherme _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/30] alpha: Clean-up the panic notifier code Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 11:13:17 -0300 Message-ID: References: <20220427224924.592546-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com> <20220427224924.592546-11-gpiccoli@igalia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=igalia.com; s=20170329; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=21Vuf08H7s2roER44d4b0UgJl5trrJFyPVjW1sFjFZE=; b=ruDiqyoExl2jG8ttjj8Kva7F0Z 0gmy1ZjUnSZw1kESJcz3XDyEnMdDBnsUYP/IGGe7AdFcEsabz8oUBo80VtrFGlI8cQnzWF9UlpBBK 4aFG0PgEAjxrGpxgz2rOXDVYxrjQeGb+FiM0Mo8j9WOU5B7iKslK22FH7g8xu7/o+vhoBdIcLeTVq TXR8EZtHjX3vb/+hbwrFc/UcTSPrqLuaLvGSeO7jUEfo1fKsk4NXM02lMULpMgFIGTd5/R8izOFMK smJXU8ctgfXKSVE5XSrKVK5cDdrQAjusLpX81WYReyDmurYDvxkw6DQoXAKa1dqFr5Ui2vHbk0ezv WsObUf8 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20220427224924.592546-11-gpiccoli-wEGTBA9jqPzQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , rth-/MQLu3FmUzdAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org Cc: akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-alpha-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, bhe-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, kexec-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-edac-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, pmladek-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org, linux-hyperv-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-leds-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mips-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-parisc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-remoteproc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-um-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-xtensa-PjhNF2WwrV/0Sa2dR60CXw@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, openipmi-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, rcu-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, xen-devel-GuqFBffKawtpuQazS67q72D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, kernel-dev-wEGTBA9jqPzQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, kernel-WeLdAqEWwDvk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org, halves-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org, fabiomirmar@gmai On 27/04/2022 19:49, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > The alpha panic notifier has some code issues, not following > the conventions of other notifiers. Also, it might halt the > machine but still it is set to run as early as possible, which > doesn't seem to be a good idea. > > This patch cleans the code, and set the notifier to run as the > latest, following the same approach other architectures are doing. > Also, we remove the unnecessary include of a header already > included indirectly. > > Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky > Cc: Matt Turner > Cc: Richard Henderson > Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli > --- > arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c | 36 +++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > index b4fbbba30aa2..d88bdf852753 100644 > --- a/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c > @@ -41,19 +41,11 @@ > #include > #include > #endif > -#include > #include > #include > #include > #include > > -static int alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *, unsigned long, void *); > -static struct notifier_block alpha_panic_block = { > - alpha_panic_event, > - NULL, > - INT_MAX /* try to do it first */ > -}; > - > #include > #include > #include > @@ -435,6 +427,21 @@ static const struct sysrq_key_op srm_sysrq_reboot_op = { > }; > #endif > > +static int alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this, > + unsigned long event, void *ptr) > +{ > + /* If we are using SRM and serial console, just hard halt here. */ > + if (alpha_using_srm && srmcons_output) > + __halt(); > + > + return NOTIFY_DONE; > +} > + > +static struct notifier_block alpha_panic_block = { > + .notifier_call = alpha_panic_event, > + .priority = INT_MIN, /* may not return, do it last */ > +}; > + > void __init > setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > { > @@ -1427,19 +1434,6 @@ const struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op = { > .show = show_cpuinfo, > }; > > - > -static int > -alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void *ptr) > -{ > -#if 1 > - /* FIXME FIXME FIXME */ > - /* If we are using SRM and serial console, just hard halt here. */ > - if (alpha_using_srm && srmcons_output) > - __halt(); > -#endif > - return NOTIFY_DONE; > -} > - > static __init int add_pcspkr(void) > { > struct platform_device *pd; Hi folks, I'm updating Richard's email and re-sending the V1, any reviews are greatly appreciated! Cheers, Guilherme