From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752620AbcEMLqT (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2016 07:46:19 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.12]:52156 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751625AbcEMLqR (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2016 07:46:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] ARM/ASoC: OMAP3: Fix McBSP2/3 sidetone support To: Tony Lindgren References: <1461927202-17677-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <69ff65ee-e5d1-09fb-fd91-8d7b4d8fdda4@ti.com> <20160512164201.GQ5995@atomide.com> CC: , , , , , , , , , From: Peter Ujfalusi Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 14:45:34 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160512164201.GQ5995@atomide.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/12/16 19:42, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Peter Ujfalusi [160511 01:46]: >> Tony, Paul, >> >> On 04/29/16 13:53, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Based on the ongoing discussion on v2 (ARM: OMAP3: Fix McBSP2/3 hwmod setup for >>> sidetone) I have dropped the removal of the sidetone hwmod and only corrected >>> it. The series now includes all related changes needed to have correct sidetone >>> support whenever we boot in legacy or in DT mode. >>> >>> This time the ASoC part have dependency on earlier patches so they can not be >>> applied separately. >> >> How should we proceed from here? I don't want to start designing the ST >> separation infrastructure which would be based on this series, but if there >> are outstanding issues found on this, I would need to go back to the drawing >> board. >> The separation will be mostly new code and code shuffle in ASoC, but for >> legacy I will need to build up something in arch as well, so I would need at >> least one release cycle to start with things. > > Well looks like we have all the acks, so I can apply these. We have > not heard from Paul on this for a while, so let's wait few days for > that. > > Meanwhile, Mark wanted to fix the subject for one of the patches, care > to repost that at least? Or the whole series with acks, could be a > pull request too against v4.6-rc1 :) Thanks, I'll wait for couple of days for Paul to review and I will prepare v4 and a pull request. -- Péter From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Ujfalusi Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] ARM/ASoC: OMAP3: Fix McBSP2/3 sidetone support Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 14:45:34 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1461927202-17677-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <69ff65ee-e5d1-09fb-fd91-8d7b4d8fdda4@ti.com> <20160512164201.GQ5995@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160512164201.GQ5995@atomide.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, paul@pwsan.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, t-kristo@ti.com, broonie@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 05/12/16 19:42, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Peter Ujfalusi [160511 01:46]: >> Tony, Paul, >> >> On 04/29/16 13:53, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Based on the ongoing discussion on v2 (ARM: OMAP3: Fix McBSP2/3 hwmod s= etup for >>> sidetone) I have dropped the removal of the sidetone hwmod and only cor= rected >>> it. The series now includes all related changes needed to have correct = sidetone >>> support whenever we boot in legacy or in DT mode. >>> >>> This time the ASoC part have dependency on earlier patches so they can = not be >>> applied separately. >> >> How should we proceed from here? I don't want to start designing the ST >> separation infrastructure which would be based on this series, but if th= ere >> are outstanding issues found on this, I would need to go back to the dra= wing >> board. >> The separation will be mostly new code and code shuffle in ASoC, but for >> legacy I will need to build up something in arch as well, so I would nee= d at >> least one release cycle to start with things. > = > Well looks like we have all the acks, so I can apply these. We have > not heard from Paul on this for a while, so let's wait few days for > that. > = > Meanwhile, Mark wanted to fix the subject for one of the patches, care > to repost that at least? Or the whole series with acks, could be a > pull request too against v4.6-rc1 :) Thanks, I'll wait for couple of days for Paul to review and I will prepare = v4 and a pull request. -- = P=E9ter From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (Peter Ujfalusi) Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 14:45:34 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] ARM/ASoC: OMAP3: Fix McBSP2/3 sidetone support In-Reply-To: <20160512164201.GQ5995@atomide.com> References: <1461927202-17677-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <69ff65ee-e5d1-09fb-fd91-8d7b4d8fdda4@ti.com> <20160512164201.GQ5995@atomide.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/12/16 19:42, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Peter Ujfalusi [160511 01:46]: >> Tony, Paul, >> >> On 04/29/16 13:53, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Based on the ongoing discussion on v2 (ARM: OMAP3: Fix McBSP2/3 hwmod setup for >>> sidetone) I have dropped the removal of the sidetone hwmod and only corrected >>> it. The series now includes all related changes needed to have correct sidetone >>> support whenever we boot in legacy or in DT mode. >>> >>> This time the ASoC part have dependency on earlier patches so they can not be >>> applied separately. >> >> How should we proceed from here? I don't want to start designing the ST >> separation infrastructure which would be based on this series, but if there >> are outstanding issues found on this, I would need to go back to the drawing >> board. >> The separation will be mostly new code and code shuffle in ASoC, but for >> legacy I will need to build up something in arch as well, so I would need at >> least one release cycle to start with things. > > Well looks like we have all the acks, so I can apply these. We have > not heard from Paul on this for a while, so let's wait few days for > that. > > Meanwhile, Mark wanted to fix the subject for one of the patches, care > to repost that at least? Or the whole series with acks, could be a > pull request too against v4.6-rc1 :) Thanks, I'll wait for couple of days for Paul to review and I will prepare v4 and a pull request. -- P?ter