From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/29] Remove the omapdrm and omapdss devices from platform code Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 15:10:40 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20170508113303.27521-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0301345606==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170508113303.27521-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: Laurent Pinchart , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Tony Lindgren , Liam Girdwood , Peter Ujfalusi , Mark Brown , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org --===============0301345606== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X2BhMTolOdDpT3Ck6EJ9Lf9DNiTs0roGo" --X2BhMTolOdDpT3Ck6EJ9Lf9DNiTs0roGo Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Dn9JqsADfVfxjca7iFu44gDvkjsFMC8tf"; protected-headers="v1" From: Tomi Valkeinen To: Laurent Pinchart , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Peter Ujfalusi , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/29] Remove the omapdrm and omapdss devices from platform code References: <20170508113303.27521-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> In-Reply-To: <20170508113303.27521-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> --Dn9JqsADfVfxjca7iFu44gDvkjsFMC8tf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/05/17 14:32, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hello, >=20 > This patch series is a second, extended version of the code previously = posted > as "[PATCH/RFC 0/7] Remove the omapdrm device from platform code". As this is a long series, I'd like to pick a bunch of patches from this series already: 1-5, 7, 19, 21. I didn't test yet, but I think those should not cause conflicts with the rest of the series. I can then push the branch, which contains also the fences and cache patches, so you can base the rest on that. Is this ok? Tomi --Dn9JqsADfVfxjca7iFu44gDvkjsFMC8tf-- --X2BhMTolOdDpT3Ck6EJ9Lf9DNiTs0roGo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZEbHAAAoJEPo9qoy8lh71WYIP/RuUr6V4+ESpyNrgfwoNPCKS EZn0Jd/wSDVgGVgOOl7FNyhmiswlH/r/Nq0aJ6UeRURr8IhrxnAeeNbMQGQfL8tb CZEg9xaEysB6FTlGnxEfa3QTjl5tZ4QNicYgwO38U8prWVOyMxuTw4UfNvRfpGBb O+9zVA1txewHrfMm2nXTuzI1ss4mPXMIUErlCiwuC20e0GD3tch30HoyjSAZVkx+ QA640a+BH8iyob31aLawofg6utNsdyVfJRV4U4fJzJp3hE18Js1mNUF5GqUBnMg2 GdWbdJV4Tjvo6Voo2EFOr1fbMvlxsMjh1ghJ9kCJGni4HvW16g4IyOoc27ZO4x56 XKywynzqmYonfHielaDjEvFn0KhBfHgMi/8JWGmjXmb4HnUQr4vKX6xzXfFyjjHl X3AbRM3w8LBeV9fdwhlaCibu692d7TKe2STOm2SKSw7EDVGIn8s60/Wy35icyiWU MXUgjpRS+ob2L3MY22aa/fBXx4vivDdQgQUuY2dKHVN53912p6vW25NQxb6UYnyO HzAWd1858qF6Sc838mUeYTpF93/cHHOVZ58U1kOiGNxSMW3x5dGyeeU90RVe+Oel S9qYxT+1jg394Pey8ns5HHgDiihWtI/DCNe8YN3/7exXu11j2ITCwPSlK7482XOY aitzIAeNmcdY2yYPBdqH =gERI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X2BhMTolOdDpT3Ck6EJ9Lf9DNiTs0roGo-- --===============0301345606== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg== --===============0301345606==--