Re: [PATCH 2/2] via-ide: Fix fuloong2e support

[Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>]

On 12/27/20 9:24 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 12/27/20 5:40 PM, BALATON Zoltan via wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> On 12/25/20 12:23 AM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>>>> From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>>
>>>> Fuloong2e needs to use legacy mode for IDE support to work with Linux.
>>>> Add property to via-ide driver to make the mode configurable, and set
>>>> legacy mode for Fuloong2e.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Fixes: 4ea98d317eb ("ide/via: Implement and use native PCI IDE mode")?
>>
>> Not really. That patch did what it said (only emulating (half) native
>> mode instead of only emulating legacy mode) so it wasn't broken per se
>> but it turned out that approach wasn't good enough for all use cases so
>> this now takes a different turn (emulating either legacy or half-native
>> mode based on option property). Therefore. I don't think Fixes: applies
>> in this case. It fixes an issue with a guest but replaces previous patch
>> with different approach. (Even though it reuses most of it.)
> 
> Well, if Linux guest got broken by this commit, why not name it a "fix"?
> Anyway I don't mind how it is called. I find important to refer to the
> commit hash to help navigating between commits while reviewing history.
> 
> What about:
> 
> '''
> The legacy mode for IDE support has been removed in commit 4ea98d317eb
> ("ide/via: Implement and use native PCI IDE mode"). When using a Linux
> guest, the Fuloong2e machine requires the legacy mode.
> Add property to via-ide driver to make the mode configurable, and set
> legacy mode for Fuloong2e.
> '''
> 
> Guenter, is that OK with you? (I can update when applying this series
> via the MIPS tree).
> 

Sure, I don't really care about the commit message as long as the problem
is fixed.

Guenter