All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, io-uring <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: fix use after free
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 22:48:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7f4724d-a869-c867-ad8e-b2a59e89c727@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez2yJdH3W_PHzvEuwpORB6MoTf9M5nOm1JL3H-wAnkJBBA@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/07/2020 05:39, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:44 PM Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> wrote:
>> After __io_free_req() put a ctx ref, it should assumed that the ctx may
>> already be gone. However, it can be accessed to put back fallback req.
>> Free req first and then put a req.
> 
> Please stick "Fixes" tags on bug fixes to make it easy to see when the
> fixed bug was introduced (especially for ones that fix severe issues
> like UAFs). From a cursory glance, it kinda seems like this one
> _might_ have been introduced in 2b85edfc0c90ef, which would mean that
> it landed in 5.6? But I can't really tell for sure without investing
> more time; you probably know that better.

It was there from the beginning,
0ddf92e848ab7 ("io_uring: provide fallback request for OOM situations")

> 
> And if this actually does affect existing releases, please also stick
> a "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" tag on it so that the fix can be
> shipped to users of those releases.

As mentioned in the cover letter, it's pretty unlikely to ever happen.
No one seems to have seen it since its introduction in November 2019.
And as the patch can't be backported automatically, not sure it's worth
the effort. Am I misjudging here?

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-03 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-29 10:12 [PATCH 0/5] cleanup for req_free/find_next Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-29 10:12 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: deduplicate freeing linked timeouts Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-29 10:13 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: replace find_next() out param with ret Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-29 10:13 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: kill REQ_F_TIMEOUT Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-29 10:13 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: kill REQ_F_TIMEOUT_NOSEQ Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-29 10:13 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: fix use after free Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-03  2:39   ` Jann Horn
2020-07-03 19:48     ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-07-03 21:32       ` Jann Horn
2020-07-04  6:49         ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-07 12:46           ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-07 13:56             ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7f4724d-a869-c867-ad8e-b2a59e89c727@gmail.com \
    --to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.