From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: "Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch RFC 5/5] x86/speculation: Add basic speculation control code
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:35:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8990c30-3e50-852c-81e3-1be2ae8e7d07@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0575AF4FD06DD142AD198903C74E1CC87A572373@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
On 01/10/2018 05:53 AM, Van De Ven, Arjan wrote:
>> ibrs_enabled 2:
>>
>> sets IBRS always in host
>
> this is not secure
>
>> This matches the semantics described here by Tim patchset on lkml:
>>
>> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151520606320646
>
> I will talk to Tim, it's not right.
>
>
Yes, there's a misunderstanding on my part. Leaving IBRS=1 all the
time may not provide full protection on all cpu models.
Tim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-10 1:06 [patch RFC 0/5] x86/spectre_v2: Initial integration of IBRS into the spectre_v2 mechanics Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 1:06 ` [patch RFC 1/5] x86/CPU: Sync CPU feature flags late Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 1:37 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-10 1:39 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-10 1:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 2:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-10 11:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 1:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 6:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-10 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-10 12:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 1:06 ` [patch RFC 2/5] x86/spectre: Simplify spectre code a bit Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 6:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-10 1:06 ` [patch RFC 3/5] x86/spectre: Prepare for IBRS selection Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 1:51 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-10 1:06 ` [patch RFC 4/5] x86/cpufeatures: Detect Speculation control feature Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 6:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-10 11:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 1:06 ` [patch RFC 5/5] x86/speculation: Add basic speculation control code Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 2:02 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-10 4:11 ` Justin Forbes
2018-01-10 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-10 9:27 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-10 11:22 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 11:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-10 11:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 11:58 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 12:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 12:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 12:12 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 12:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 12:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:42 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-10 12:09 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 12:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 12:29 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 12:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 12:47 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-01-10 12:51 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 13:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 12:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:07 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 13:45 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-10 13:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:53 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-10 21:35 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2018-01-10 22:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 13:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 13:51 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-10 13:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 13:58 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 14:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 14:14 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-10 14:59 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-10 15:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 15:24 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 15:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 15:56 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-10 13:10 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8990c30-3e50-852c-81e3-1be2ae8e7d07@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.