From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C5731822F for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 07:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr003msb.fastweb.it (mr003msb.fastweb.it [85.18.95.87]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CC3C04BD37 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 07:20:16 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:20:14 +0200 From: Gionatan Danti In-Reply-To: <2f9c4346d4e9646ca058efdf535d435e@xenhideout.nl> References: <1438f48b-0a6d-4fb7-92dc-3688251e0a00@assyoma.it> <2f9c4346d4e9646ca058efdf535d435e@xenhideout.nl> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Snapshot behavior on classic LVM vs ThinLVM Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Cc: Xen Il 13-04-2017 14:41 Xen ha scritto: > > See, you only compared multiple non-thin with a single-thin. > > So my question is: > > did you consider multiple thin volumes? > Hi, the multiple-thin-volume solution, while being very flexible, is not well understood by libvirt and virt-manager. So I need to pass on that (for the moment at least). Thanks. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8