From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B13CC433E0 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF91A23358 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732247AbhAONRZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:17:25 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:50385 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732170AbhAONRY (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:17:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610716558; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dV0VIxtOow3nIBadYeaRETElBYXibOZ77ggrv4koxxw=; b=QxPfPes1vvKZ4AyY8XuFfa/qaLe/i4X7x6bVAIKfuxRp6FZjuFpwsTwOBJAHmQXuUSnoRS yjUV57bDIGpIebsU8RjlDuxkENVZeLucamdRWn9Mr/3JkTS7TfV+lTVVhD5d46SwH2f9KY aLoYkuMA05H879Nb/BtS/weRnxDwB0U= Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-73-_Q3W-ZLOOtSC4zytMtqFAQ-1; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:15:56 -0500 X-MC-Unique: _Q3W-ZLOOtSC4zytMtqFAQ-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id g14so3843735edt.12 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:15:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dV0VIxtOow3nIBadYeaRETElBYXibOZ77ggrv4koxxw=; b=BXhWD2WaH+9pRroJGDRYMPPfNUzxyQanx2yCj8OT+6ukYBFshB81QDLSaYSKSsm4RJ 348Myp6TP2Lc9vT617cjsbEMX2o6m7m3Apyl/bm5qCiiTgAT3Ki1PQapj+WVl4l+8m36 O5A1bH5aSf2D6xMmYHXFPHY6vT/ofyOMGrOwv5Di4x7t6Eh4SA77/IgxZOwHhMuu/iG6 dA3Ql7yPG7Mo6siFpTpev5D0Smf29KRlOkd/wcbWGCM6bLItd0LXxhzggd208rgw9zdw GLUnqm8bl+i06w5E67cJFs9Rrb5F48pQJKrn3zle/LdeR3wQzfO+gqYmtQnC9Uap3WKe /4tA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pOuO3mE4limLywojWYKQBUC7pTCKEVgJBHGkGfL5+ljv1SedC 0m4CJvi/0+uZDLXFmqb3rJviXUEom3FQ52G9rpmyOgvcLp6dIHX8kCxj0RP3QGi1n5sEX5s7DSO TDh6U9z6iq2x1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2681:: with SMTP id t1mr8759742ejc.29.1610716555550; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:15:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXZkTwApypH8mMny5nyZy9cV4F/Z1aIUwN/opNrl8epxNKrjnRnEg4UAdOUMgmPBBv05Cmqw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2681:: with SMTP id t1mr8759729ejc.29.1610716555367; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:15:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h12sm3117462edb.16.2021.01.15.05.15.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:15:54 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH kvm-unit-tests 0/4] add generic stress test To: Sean Christopherson Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, mlevitsk@redhat.com References: <20201223010850.111882-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:15:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On 14/01/21 23:13, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 14/01/21 21:13, Sean Christopherson wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> On 12/01/21 23:28, Sean Christopherson wrote: >>>>> What's the biggest hurdle for doing this completely within the unit test >>>>> framework? Is teaching the framework to migrate a unit test the biggest pain? >>>> >>>> Yes, pretty much. The shell script framework would show its limits. >>>> >>>> That said, I've always treated run_tests.sh as a utility more than an >>>> integral part of kvm-unit-tests. There's nothing that prevents a more >>>> capable framework from parsing unittests.cfg. >>> >>> Heh, got anyone you can "volunteer" to create a new framework? One-button >>> migration testing would be very nice to have. I suspect I'm not the only >>> contributor that doesn't do migration testing as part of their standard workflow. >> >> avocado-vt is the one I use for installation tests. It can do a lot more, >> including migration, but it is a bit hard to set up. > > Is avocado-vt the test stuff you were talking about at the KVM Forum BoF? Yes, it is. Paolo