From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] net/i40e: support input set configuration Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:12:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1515121386-126382-1-git-send-email-beilei.xing@intel.com> <1515380954-36017-1-git-send-email-beilei.xing@intel.com> <1515380954-36017-2-git-send-email-beilei.xing@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, andrey.chilikin@intel.com To: Beilei Xing , jingjing.wu@intel.com, wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA83B1B161 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:12:43 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1515380954-36017-2-git-send-email-beilei.xing@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 1/8/2018 3:09 AM, Beilei Xing wrote: > +static inline int > +rte_pmd_i40e_inset_field_clear(uint64_t *inset, uint8_t field_idx) > +{ > + uint8_t bit_idx; > + > + if (field_idx > 63) > + return -1; > + > + bit_idx = 63 - field_idx; > + *inset = *inset & ~(1ULL << bit_idx); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > #endif /* _PMD_I40E_H_ */ > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e_version.map b/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e_version.map > index ebbd24e..0fafadd 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e_version.map > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e_version.map > @@ -58,3 +58,13 @@ DPDK_17.11 { > rte_pmd_i40e_rss_queue_region_conf; > > } DPDK_17.08; > + > +DPDK_18.02 { > + global: > + > + rte_pmd_i40e_inset_get; > + rte_pmd_i40e_inset_set; > + rte_pmd_i40e_inset_field_get; > + rte_pmd_i40e_inset_field_set; > + rte_pmd_i40e_inset_field_clear; I think we don't need static inline functions in linker script, do we? > +} DPDK_17.11;