From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DFAC433FE for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 02:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231240AbiBVCAZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2022 21:00:25 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:50200 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231191AbiBVCAY (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2022 21:00:24 -0500 Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam10on2079.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.94.79]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F33A01EECA; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:59:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YWxZttprfJpkOs9HdRyCnDYTNxHmtnXbq1zYRT/c6j2ndM+TF9dvP3dfHkLqWEO/fbyV7ZR/ILvHuptLPISIdXpG8iust25vP/z/ww6aoLtiHHXNhf6A+MqtdnNM380WeTMGfY35jSEOQT9SnpHjK3crXpp/lpNp3H+1wxkWuwbcmxTAdSHD/8ekJuBxbMf3c20c/iVLT0cef5Ic0XcNs61812zX6NKgoIcNTqf6OVFtoGJ7RPiXsJNBf/4lWC3OMOjEXHM8N0jsGuWbcbyMx51jgZkxM6UHcF8UHX0XhWGlMCGKC+fDb5lGzMSe3GsTZuw7X4Tyu9Z2o3Ta04VO4g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=OToCk+IAbAlTw4lFscXKZtT7O4aSFkZoiwzb8G5LA9M=; b=g2oW6XRISbvcwzHhm/vHsb/pcIL9xeibhc1hD5fQvsPhwhAmz+tojGRvwnW9IHJ26gEzgSv1JPQQg2ABjtvXwWk1lWLdfnrzmSRWuyP3SCaScu98cjJEmzcClSOYsgOyuySm4/lzQ7yyZH6/x8LqXxqtNo4lVw5a6u/dFez7JI8wMtulFfv/HPM1jagKGLrjjZBXf3mIh/clfi/NzOglmFyEMLauTFK3lF0F993mmBUGtyepvG65gvkV+B6kzo5QCE3UeU1ISKnGDn9NCu71DlGMKJP+A1UBm8fici3KWCoooYsfKR+tMR+Pa3lFEXaC5UG+Syk17drT1wACr4vKGA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 149.199.80.198) smtp.rcpttodomain=linaro.org smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=xilinx.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xilinx.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-xilinx-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=OToCk+IAbAlTw4lFscXKZtT7O4aSFkZoiwzb8G5LA9M=; b=FdAsiRWTCeKI5vAQ3HF3GWRj9W2HHTdj62oGWLS+xSy/Pps0NVGpjw4O9ST77FkOkLSbRUz7nS4dc3HEQ1WIirp5/XV2k3pKV2AnDjV01Ce0LzT+WoK5fk8yRKd5IQkgtfx2cokQobEEbsm4VXPXUE2vIVFzy3BgFCBnTApxfyE= Received: from DM5PR13CA0008.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:23::18) by SA2PR02MB7530.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:149::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4995.24; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 01:59:53 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM02FT003.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:23:cafe::6c) by DM5PR13CA0008.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:3:23::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5017.9 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 01:59:53 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 149.199.80.198) smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=xilinx.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of xilinx.com designates 149.199.80.198 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=149.199.80.198; helo=xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com; Received: from xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com (149.199.80.198) by DM3NAM02FT003.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.4.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.4995.19 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 01:59:53 +0000 Received: from xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.21.17.17) by xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.21.17.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 01:59:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.xilinx.com (172.21.105.197) by xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.21.17.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2176.14 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 01:59:52 +0000 Envelope-to: michal.simek@xilinx.com, ben.levinsky@xilinx.com, sergei.korneichuk@xilinx.com, arun.balaji.kannan@xilinx.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, bill.mills@linaro.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Received: from [10.71.118.67] (port=46224) by smtp.xilinx.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90) (envelope-from ) id 1nMKT1-0004Yb-7B; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 01:59:51 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:59:48 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 From: Tanmay Shah Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] drivers: remoteproc: Add Xilinx r5 remoteproc driver To: Mathieu Poirier CC: , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20220210112824.2084724-1-tanmay.shah@xilinx.com> <20220210112824.2084724-7-tanmay.shah@xilinx.com> <20220215185816.GB101373@p14s> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20220215185816.GB101373@p14s> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: b6c22416-7c21-4ca4-3eef-08d9f5a7049a X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SA2PR02MB7530:EE_ X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:149.199.80.198;CTRY:IE;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:CAL;SFV:NSPM;H:xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com;PTR:unknown-80-198.xilinx.com;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230001)(4636009)(36840700001)(46966006)(40470700004)(30864003)(6916009)(54906003)(426003)(83380400001)(2906002)(44832011)(40460700003)(53546011)(336012)(6666004)(31686004)(8936002)(47076005)(9786002)(36860700001)(36756003)(5660300002)(70206006)(82310400004)(26005)(186003)(2616005)(8676002)(4326008)(70586007)(356005)(31696002)(508600001)(316002)(7636003)(50156003)(43740500002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: xilinx.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Feb 2022 01:59:53.2853 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b6c22416-7c21-4ca4-3eef-08d9f5a7049a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c;Ip=[149.199.80.198];Helo=[xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM3NAM02FT003.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SA2PR02MB7530 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org On 2/15/22 10:58 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:28:24AM -0800, Tanmay Shah wrote: >> This driver enables r5f dual core Real time Processing Unit subsystem >> available on Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale MPSoC Platform. RPU subsystem >> (cluster) can be configured in different modes e.g. split mode in which >> two r5f cores work independent of each other and lock-step mode in which >> both r5f cores execute same code clock-for-clock and notify if the >> result is different. >> >> The Xilinx r5 Remoteproc Driver boots the RPU cores via calls to the Xilinx >> Platform Management Unit that handles the R5 configuration, memory access >> and R5 lifecycle management. The interface to this manager is done in this >> driver via zynqmp_pm_* function calls. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky >> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah >> --- >> >> Changes in v3: >> - Fix checkpatch script indentation warning >> - Remove unused variable from xilinx remoteproc driver >> - use C style comments, i.e /*...*/ >> - Remove redundant debug information which can be derived using /proc/device-tree >> - Fix multilined comment format >> - s/"final fot TCM"/"final for TCM" >> - Function devm_kzalloc() does not return an code on error, just NULL. >> Remove redundant error check for this function throughout the driver. >> - Fix RPU mode configuration and add documentation accordingly >> - Get rid of the indentations to match function documentation style with rest of the driver >> - Fix memory leak by only using r5_rproc->priv and not replace it with new instance >> - Use 'i' for the outer loop and 'j' for the inner one as per convention >> - Remove redundant error and NULL checks throughout the driver >> - Use devm_kcalloc() when more than one element is required >> - Add memory-regions carveouts during driver probe instead of parse_fw call >> This removes redundant copy of reserved_mem object in r5_core structure. >> - Fix memory leak by using of_node_put() >> - Fix indentation of tcm_mem_map function args >> - Remove redundant init of variables >> - Initialize tcm bank size variable for lockstep mode >> - Replace u32 with phys_addr_t for variable stroing memory bank address >> - Add documentation of TCM behavior in lockstep mode >> - Use dev_get_drvdata instead of platform driver API >> - Remove info level messages >> - Fix checkpatch.pl warnings >> - Add documentation for the Xilinx r5f platform to understand driver design >> >> drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 12 + >> drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 973 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 986 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig >> index 166019786653..5637a71c0677 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig >> @@ -352,6 +352,18 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC >> It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing >> a slave processor. >> >> +config XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC >> + tristate "Xilinx R5 remoteproc support" >> + depends on PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP >> + depends on ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE >> + select RPMSG_VIRTIO >> + select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX >> + help >> + Say y or m here to support Xilinx R5 remote processors via the remote >> + processor framework. >> + >> + It's safe to say N if not interested in using RPU r5f cores. >> + >> endif # REMOTEPROC >> >> endmenu >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile >> index 5478c7cb9e07..91314a9b43ce 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile >> @@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC) += xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..ce2ac364b995 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,973 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/* >> + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver >> + * >> + */ >> + >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include > No mailboxes are used in this revision and as such the above are not needed. Sure I will remove them. >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include > As far as I can tell the above two includes are also not needed. Moreover > dma-mapping.h should be included because of dma_set_coherent_mask() and > DMA_BIT_MASK(). Ok I will add it and remove redundant headers. >> + >> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h" >> + >> +/* settings for RPU cluster mode */ >> +enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode { >> + SPLIT_MODE = 0, /* When cores run as separate processor */ >> + LOCKSTEP_MODE = 1, /* cores execute same code in lockstep,clk-for-clk */ >> + SINGLE_CPU_MODE = 2, /* core0 is held in reset and only core1 runs */ >> +}; >> + >> +/** >> + * struct mem_bank_data - Memory Bank description >> + * >> + * @addr: Start address of memory bank >> + * @size: Size of Memory bank >> + * @pm_domain_id: Power-domains id of memory bank for firmware to turn on/off >> + * @bank_name: name of the bank for remoteproc framework >> + */ >> +struct mem_bank_data { >> + phys_addr_t addr; >> + size_t size; >> + u32 pm_domain_id; >> + char *bank_name; >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks[] = { >> + {0xffe00000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */ >> + {0xffe20000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_BTCM, "btcm0"}, >> + {0xffe90000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_ATCM, "atcm1"}, >> + {0xffeb0000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_BTCM, "btcm1"}, >> +}; >> + >> +/** >> + * struct zynqmp_r5_core - ZynqMP R5 core structure >> + * >> + * @dev: device of RPU instance >> + * @np: device node of RPU instance >> + * @tcm_bank_count: number TCM banks accessible to this RPU >> + * @tcm_banks: array of each TCM bank data >> + * @rproc: rproc handle >> + * @pm_domain_id: RPU CPU power domain id >> + */ >> +struct zynqmp_r5_core { >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct device_node *np; >> + int tcm_bank_count; >> + struct mem_bank_data *tcm_banks; >> + struct rproc *rproc; >> + u32 pm_domain_id; >> +}; >> + >> +/** >> + * struct zynqmp_r5_cluster - ZynqMP R5 cluster structure >> + * >> + * @dev: r5f subsystem cluster device node >> + * @mode: cluster mode of type zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode >> + * @core_count: number of r5 cores used for this cluster mode >> + * @r5_cores: Array of pointers pointing to r5 core >> + */ >> +struct zynqmp_r5_cluster { >> + struct device *dev; >> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode mode; >> + int core_count; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores; >> +}; >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_set_mode - set RPU operation mode >> + * >> + * set RPU operation mode >> + * >> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core, >> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode rpu_mode) >> +{ >> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode; >> + int ret, reg_val; >> + >> + /* >> + * SINGLE CPU mode is not supported in driver yet. >> + * For now we only set lockstep mode or split mode. >> + */ >> + if (rpu_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) { >> + reg_val = 0; >> + } else if (rpu_mode == SPLIT_MODE) { >> + reg_val = 1; >> + } else if (rpu_mode == SINGLE_CPU_MODE) { >> + pr_err("RPU single cpu mode is not supported\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, reg_val); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + pr_err("failed to set RPU mode\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * At this point RPU is assumed to be configured only in >> + * lockstep mode or split mode. Configure TCM accordingly. >> + */ >> + tcm_mode = (rpu_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) ? >> + PM_RPU_TCM_COMB : PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT; >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + pr_err("failed to configure TCM\n"); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * >> + * Start R5 Core from designated boot address. >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) >> +{ >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv; >> + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem; >> + int ret; >> + >> + /* >> + * The exception vector pointers (EVP) refer to the base-address of >> + * exception vectors (for reset, IRQ, FIQ, etc). The reset-vector >> + * starts at the base-address and subsequent vectors are on 4-byte >> + * boundaries. >> + * >> + * Exception vectors can start either from 0x0000_0000 (LOVEC) or >> + * from 0xFFFF_0000 (HIVEC) which is mapped in the OCM (On-Chip Memory) >> + * >> + * Usually firmware will put Exception vectors at LOVEC. >> + * >> + * It is not recommend that you change the exception vector. >> + * Changing the EVP to HIVEC will result in increased interrupt latency >> + * and jitter. Also, if the OCM is secured and the Cortex-R5F processor >> + * is non-secured, then the Cortex-R5F processor cannot access the >> + * HIVEC exception vectors in the OCM. >> + */ >> + bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr >= 0xFFFC0000) ? >> + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC; >> + >> + dev_dbg(r5_core->dev, "RPU boot addr 0x%llx from %s.", rproc->bootaddr, >> + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM"); >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_wake(r5_core->pm_domain_id, 1, >> + bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO); >> + if (ret) >> + pr_err("failed to start RPU = 0x%x\n", r5_core->pm_domain_id); >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * >> + * Power down R5 Core. >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) >> +{ >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(r5_core->pm_domain_id, >> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING); >> + if (ret) >> + pr_err("failed to stop remoteproc RPU %d\n", ret); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_map >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * @mem: mem entry to map >> + * >> + * Callback to map va for memory-region's carveout. >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc, >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) >> +{ >> + void __iomem *va; >> + >> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len); >> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + mem->va = (void *)va; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap >> + * >> + * Unmap memory-region carveout >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc, >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) >> +{ >> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va); >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * add_mem_regions >> + * @r5_core: single R5 core's corresponding zynqmp_r5_core type instance >> + * @rmem: reserved mem region parsed from dt node >> + * >> + * Construct rproc mem carveouts from carveout provided in >> + * memory-region property >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int add_mem_regions_carveout(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core, >> + struct reserved_mem *rmem) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; >> + struct rproc *rproc; >> + >> + rproc = r5_core->rproc; >> + dev = r5_core->dev; >> + >> + /* Register associated reserved memory regions */ >> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, >> + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base, >> + rmem->size, rmem->base, >> + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_map, >> + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap, >> + rmem->name); >> + if (!mem) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap >> + * >> + * Unmap TCM banks when powering down R5 core. >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int tcm_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) >> +{ >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + int i; >> + u32 pm_domain_id; >> + >> + r5_core = rproc->priv; >> + if (!r5_core) { >> + pr_err("r5 core is not available\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va); >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; i++) { >> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id; >> + if (zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id)) >> + pr_warn("can't turn off TCM bank 0x%x", pm_domain_id); >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * tcm_mem_map >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * @mem: mem entry to initialize the va and da fields of >> + * >> + * Given TCM bank entry, this callback will set device address for R5 >> + * running on TCM and also setup virtual address for TCM bank >> + * remoteproc carveout. >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc, >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) >> +{ >> + void __iomem *va; >> + >> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len); >> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + /* Update memory entry va */ >> + mem->va = (void *)va; >> + >> + /* clear TCMs */ >> + memset_io(va, 0, mem->len); >> + >> + /* >> + * The R5s expect their TCM banks to be at address 0x0 and 0x2000, >> + * while on the Linux side they are at 0xffexxxxx. >> + * >> + * Zero out the high 12 bits of the address. This will give >> + * expected values for TCM Banks 0A and 0B (0x0 and 0x20000). >> + */ >> + mem->da &= 0x000fffff; >> + >> + /* >> + * TCM Banks 1A and 1B still have to be translated. >> + * >> + * Below handle these two banks' absolute addresses (0xffe90000 and >> + * 0xffeb0000) and convert to the expected relative addresses >> + * (0x0 and 0x20000). >> + */ >> + if (mem->da == 0x90000 || mem->da == 0xB0000) >> + mem->da -= 0x90000; >> + >> + /* if translated TCM bank address is not valid report error */ >> + if (mem->da != 0x0 && mem->da != 0x20000) { >> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "invalid TCM address: %x\n", mem->da); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(struct rproc *rproc) >> +{ >> + int i, num_banks, ret; >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; >> + u32 pm_domain_id; >> + phys_addr_t bank_addr; >> + size_t bank_size; >> + char *bank_name; >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + >> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv; >> + >> + dev = r5_core->dev; >> + >> + /* go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */ >> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count; >> + if (num_banks <= 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "need to specify TCM banks\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * Power-on Each 64KB TCM, >> + * register its address space, map and unmap functions >> + * and add carveouts accordingly >> + */ >> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) { >> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].addr; >> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].bank_name; >> + bank_size = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].size; >> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id; >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id, >> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0, >> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM carveout split mode %s addr=%llx, size=0x%lx", >> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size); >> + >> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr, >> + bank_size, bank_addr, >> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap, >> + bank_name); >> + if (!mem) { >> + /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */ >> + do { >> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id; >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id); >> + if (ret) >> + dev_warn(dev, >> + "fail to release node: 0x%x, %x\n", >> + pm_domain_id, ret); >> + } while (i--); >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } >> + >> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(struct rproc *rproc) >> +{ >> + int i, num_banks, ret; >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; >> + u32 pm_domain_id; >> + phys_addr_t bank_addr; >> + size_t bank_size = 0; >> + char *bank_name; >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + >> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv; >> + dev = r5_core->dev; >> + >> + /* Go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */ >> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count; >> + if (num_banks <= 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "need to specify TCM banks\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * In lockstep mode, TCM is contiguous memory block >> + * However, each TCM block still needs to be enabled individually. >> + * So, Enable each TCM block individually, but add their size >> + * to create contiguous memory region. >> + */ >> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[0].addr; >> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[0].bank_name; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) { >> + bank_size += r5_core->tcm_banks[i].size; >> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id; >> + >> + /* Turn on each TCM bank individually */ >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id, >> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0, >> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM add carveout lockstep mode %s addr=0x%llx, size=0x%lx", >> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size); >> + >> + /* Register TCM address range, TCM map and unmap functions */ >> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr, >> + bank_size, bank_addr, >> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap, >> + bank_name); >> + if (!mem) { >> + /* In case of error, turn off TCM banks */ >> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) { >> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id; >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id); >> + if (ret) >> + dev_warn(dev, >> + "fail to release node: 0x%x ret: %x\n", >> + pm_domain_id, ret); >> + } >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } >> + >> + /* If registration is success, add carveouts */ >> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * add_tcm_banks() >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * >> + * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance >> + * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory >> + * needed for firmware to be loaded >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int add_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct platform_device *parent_pdev; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + >> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv; >> + if (!r5_core) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + dev = r5_core->dev; >> + >> + cluster = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent); >> + if (!cluster) { >> + dev_err(&parent_pdev->dev, "Invalid driver data\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * In lockstep mode TCM banks are one contiguous memory region of 256Kb >> + * In split mode, each TCM bank is 64Kb and not contiguous. >> + * We add memory carveouts accordingly. >> + */ >> + if (cluster->mode == SPLIT_MODE) >> + return add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(rproc); >> + else if (cluster->mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) >> + return add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(rproc); >> + >> + dev_err(cluster->dev, "invalid cluster mode\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw() >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core >> + * >> + * When loading firmware, ensure the necessary carveouts are in remoteproc >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + struct device *dev; >> + >> + r5_core = rproc->priv; >> + >> + dev = r5_core->dev; >> + >> + ret = add_tcm_banks(rproc); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get TCM banks, err %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw); >> + if (ret == -EINVAL) { >> + /* >> + * resource table only required for IPC. >> + * if not present, this is not necessarily an error; >> + * for example, loading r5 hello world application >> + * so simply inform user and keep going. >> + */ >> + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n"); >> + ret = 0; >> + } >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = { >> + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start, >> + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop, >> + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, >> + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw, >> + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, >> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, >> + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, >> +}; >> + >> +/** >> + * zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core() >> + * Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node >> + * this is called for each individual R5 core >> + * >> + * @cdev: Device node of each r5 core >> + * >> + * Return: zynqmp_r5_core object for success, error pointer in case of error. >> + */ >> +static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + struct rproc *r5_rproc; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + >> + /* Set up DMA mask */ >> + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(cdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); >> + if (ret) >> + return ERR_PTR(ret); >> + >> + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */ >> + r5_rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(cdev, dev_name(cdev), >> + &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops, >> + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core)); >> + if (!r5_rproc) { >> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to allocate memory for rproc instance\n"); >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >> + } >> + >> + r5_rproc->auto_boot = false; >> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)r5_rproc->priv; >> + r5_core->dev = cdev; >> + >> + /* Add R5 remoteproc core */ >> + ret = devm_rproc_add(cdev, r5_rproc); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to add r5 remoteproc\n"); >> + return ERR_PTR(ret); >> + } >> + >> + r5_core->rproc = r5_rproc; >> + return r5_core; >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node() >> + * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information >> + * in r5_core instance. We will use hardcoded TCM information from >> + * driver for now in this function. >> + * >> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object >> + * >> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure. >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster) >> +{ >> + int tcm_bank_count, tcm_node; >> + int i = 0, j; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + const struct mem_bank_data *tcm = zynqmp_tcm_banks; >> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev; >> + >> + /* >> + * ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver until >> + * system-dt spec is not final for TCM >> + */ >> + tcm_bank_count = ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_tcm_banks); >> + >> + /* count per core tcm banks */ >> + tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count / cluster->core_count; >> + >> + /* r5 core 0 will use all of TCM banks in lockstep mode. >> + * In split mode, r5 core0 will use 128k and r5 core1 will use another >> + * 128k. Assign TCM banks to each core accordingly >> + */ >> + tcm_node = 0; >> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) { >> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i]; >> + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count, >> + sizeof(struct mem_bank_data), >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!r5_core->tcm_banks) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + for (j = 0; j < tcm_bank_count; j++) { >> + /* Use pre-defined TCM reg values. >> + * Eventually this should be replaced by values >> + * parsed from dts. >> + */ >> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j].addr = tcm[tcm_node].addr; >> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j].size = tcm[tcm_node].size; >> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j].pm_domain_id = tcm[tcm_node].pm_domain_id; >> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j].bank_name = tcm[tcm_node].bank_name; >> + tcm_node++; >> + } >> + >> + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node() >> + * parse memory-region property from dt node and add >> + * memory region carveouts >> + * >> + * @r5_core: pointer to zynqmp_r5_core type object >> + * >> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure. >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core) >> +{ >> + int res_mem_count, i, ret; >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct device_node *np, *rmem_np; >> + struct reserved_mem *rmem; >> + >> + dev = r5_core->dev; >> + >> + np = r5_core->np; >> + >> + res_mem_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region", >> + sizeof(phandle)); >> + if (res_mem_count <= 0) { >> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get memory-region property %d\n", >> + res_mem_count); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < res_mem_count; i++) { >> + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i); >> + if (!rmem_np) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np); >> + if (!rmem) { >> + of_node_put(rmem_np); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + ret = add_mem_regions_carveout(r5_core, rmem); >> + if (ret) >> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get reserve mem regions %d\n", >> + ret); >> + >> + of_node_put(rmem_np); >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_core_init() >> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_core type object >> + * >> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object >> + * >> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure. >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster) >> +{ >> + int ret, i; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev; >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) { >> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i]; >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(r5_core); >> + if (ret) >> + dev_warn(dev, "memory-region prop failed %d\n", ret); >> + >> + /* Initialize r5 cores with power-domains parsed from dts */ >> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(r5_core->np, "power-domains", >> + 1, &r5_core->pm_domain_id); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get power-domains property\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, cluster->mode); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to set r5 cluster mode %d, err %d\n", >> + cluster->mode, ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_cluster_init() >> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_cluster type object >> + * >> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object >> + * >> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure. >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev; >> + struct device_node *dev_node = dev_of_node(dev); >> + struct device_node *child; >> + struct platform_device *child_pdev; >> + int core_count = 0, ret, i; >> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode cluster_mode = LOCKSTEP_MODE; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores; >> + >> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &cluster_mode); >> + >> + /* >> + * on success returns 0, if not defined then returns -EINVAL, >> + * In that case, default is LOCKSTEP mode >> + */ >> + if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid xlnx,cluster-mode property\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * For now driver only supports split mode and lockstep mode. >> + * fail driver probe if either of that is not set in dts >> + */ >> + if (cluster_mode == SINGLE_CPU_MODE) { >> + dev_err(dev, "driver does not support single cpu mode\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } else if ((cluster_mode != SPLIT_MODE && >> + cluster_mode != LOCKSTEP_MODE)) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid cluster mode\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * Number of cores is decided by number of child nodes of >> + * r5f subsystem node in dts. If Split mode is used in dts >> + * 2 child nodes are expected. >> + * In lockstep mode if two child nodes are available, >> + * only use first child node and consider it as core0 >> + * and ignore core1 dt node. >> + */ >> + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev_node); >> + if (core_count <= 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) { >> + dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n"); >> + core_count = 1; >> + } >> + >> + r5_cores = devm_kcalloc(dev, core_count, >> + sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core *), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!r5_cores) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + i = 0; >> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_node, child) { >> + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(child); >> + if (!child_pdev) { >> + of_node_put(child); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> + /* create and add remoteproc instance of type struct rproc */ >> + r5_cores[i] = zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(&child_pdev->dev); >> + r5_cores[i]->dev = &child_pdev->dev; >> + if (!r5_cores[i]->dev) { >> + dev_err(dev, "can't get device for r5 core %d\n", i); >> + of_node_put(child); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> + r5_cores[i]->np = dev_of_node(r5_cores[i]->dev); >> + if (!r5_cores[i]->np) { >> + dev_err(dev, "can't get device node for r5 core %d\n", i); >> + of_node_put(child); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> + i++; >> + >> + /* >> + * If two child nodes are available in dts in lockstep mode, >> + * then ignore second child node. >> + */ >> + if (i == core_count) { >> + of_node_put(child); >> + break; >> + } >> + of_node_put(child); >> + } >> + >> + cluster->mode = cluster_mode; >> + cluster->core_count = core_count; >> + cluster->r5_cores = r5_cores; >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_r5_core_init(cluster); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core err %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static void zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(void *data) >> +{ >> + struct platform_device *pdev = (struct platform_device *)data; >> + >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); >> + >> + pr_info("Exit r5f subsystem driver\n"); >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe() >> + * >> + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster >> + * >> + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT, >> + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations >> + * >> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure. >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster; >> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >> + >> + cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!cluster) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + cluster->dev = dev; >> + >> + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to populate platform dev %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; > Please use dev_err_probe() Ok. >> + } >> + >> + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */ >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster); >> + >> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit, pdev); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; > Not sure this is needed. The TI guys used that mechanic to release acquired > resources but merely setting driver data to NULL doesn't mandate all this. If I use zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit to free devices of r5_core using put_device( ) API then can I keep this? More on this in next email. >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(cluster); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid r5f subsystem device tree\n"); >> + return ret; > Here to. > > More comments to come tomorrow. > > Thanks, > Mathieu > >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* Match table for OF platform binding */ >> +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = { >> + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", }, >> + { /* end of list */ }, >> +}; >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match); >> + >> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = { >> + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe, >> + .driver = { >> + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc", >> + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match, >> + }, >> +}; >> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver); >> + >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver"); >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc."); >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64D11C433EF for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 02:01:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:References:CC:To:Subject:From: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Q1txci8WqeZH23zS71eUUZMgAP2HaLPKO7hceUGTOL4=; b=ss3mYuy5Il4L73 mbfMpI2LRuEihRU3LYtE+ZdSXYrK+HzAuEf1B6RT8vX1wlAezTRKA4iYAu8hRRHca9QyMUwra/104 f/1Atvnoe31ith/GmgVVCL1PYQ88GH68+oAS0b5EF1M4jWEY98mE/M8chVG1QLK88Fsc9csZePjUn 9iDdmokGLGZ72n1ZCIBfXW0+M2dXnjIsJmzmKMptp5gLGrK/9Mu4yx02anKni8DwAU8xjEKb62QnZ f5oPolxXyuK63IdX5maq0eubFoYRD4bvF7DOiaptztO2EsxbzpmHsxnS1rt9iwDZ4quzX5qATOVyn VnM81Tj+Bdrbv5Q7sH2w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nMKTE-007gXb-OK; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 02:00:05 +0000 Received: from mail-mw2nam10on20626.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([2a01:111:f400:7e89::626] helo=NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nMKT8-007gWC-CB for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 02:00:02 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YWxZttprfJpkOs9HdRyCnDYTNxHmtnXbq1zYRT/c6j2ndM+TF9dvP3dfHkLqWEO/fbyV7ZR/ILvHuptLPISIdXpG8iust25vP/z/ww6aoLtiHHXNhf6A+MqtdnNM380WeTMGfY35jSEOQT9SnpHjK3crXpp/lpNp3H+1wxkWuwbcmxTAdSHD/8ekJuBxbMf3c20c/iVLT0cef5Ic0XcNs61812zX6NKgoIcNTqf6OVFtoGJ7RPiXsJNBf/4lWC3OMOjEXHM8N0jsGuWbcbyMx51jgZkxM6UHcF8UHX0XhWGlMCGKC+fDb5lGzMSe3GsTZuw7X4Tyu9Z2o3Ta04VO4g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=OToCk+IAbAlTw4lFscXKZtT7O4aSFkZoiwzb8G5LA9M=; b=g2oW6XRISbvcwzHhm/vHsb/pcIL9xeibhc1hD5fQvsPhwhAmz+tojGRvwnW9IHJ26gEzgSv1JPQQg2ABjtvXwWk1lWLdfnrzmSRWuyP3SCaScu98cjJEmzcClSOYsgOyuySm4/lzQ7yyZH6/x8LqXxqtNo4lVw5a6u/dFez7JI8wMtulFfv/HPM1jagKGLrjjZBXf3mIh/clfi/NzOglmFyEMLauTFK3lF0F993mmBUGtyepvG65gvkV+B6kzo5QCE3UeU1ISKnGDn9NCu71DlGMKJP+A1UBm8fici3KWCoooYsfKR+tMR+Pa3lFEXaC5UG+Syk17drT1wACr4vKGA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 149.199.80.198) smtp.rcpttodomain=linaro.org smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=xilinx.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xilinx.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-xilinx-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=OToCk+IAbAlTw4lFscXKZtT7O4aSFkZoiwzb8G5LA9M=; b=FdAsiRWTCeKI5vAQ3HF3GWRj9W2HHTdj62oGWLS+xSy/Pps0NVGpjw4O9ST77FkOkLSbRUz7nS4dc3HEQ1WIirp5/XV2k3pKV2AnDjV01Ce0LzT+WoK5fk8yRKd5IQkgtfx2cokQobEEbsm4VXPXUE2vIVFzy3BgFCBnTApxfyE= Received: from DM5PR13CA0008.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:23::18) by SA2PR02MB7530.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:149::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4995.24; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 01:59:53 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM02FT003.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:23:cafe::6c) by DM5PR13CA0008.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:3:23::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5017.9 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 01:59:53 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 149.199.80.198) smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=xilinx.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of xilinx.com designates 149.199.80.198 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=149.199.80.198; helo=xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com; Received: from xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com (149.199.80.198) by DM3NAM02FT003.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.4.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.4995.19 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 01:59:53 +0000 Received: from xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.21.17.17) by xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.21.17.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 01:59:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.xilinx.com (172.21.105.197) by xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.21.17.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2176.14 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 01:59:52 +0000 Received: from [10.71.118.67] (port=46224) by smtp.xilinx.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90) (envelope-from ) id 1nMKT1-0004Yb-7B; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 01:59:51 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:59:48 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 From: Tanmay Shah Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] drivers: remoteproc: Add Xilinx r5 remoteproc driver To: Mathieu Poirier CC: , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20220210112824.2084724-1-tanmay.shah@xilinx.com> <20220210112824.2084724-7-tanmay.shah@xilinx.com> <20220215185816.GB101373@p14s> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20220215185816.GB101373@p14s> X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: b6c22416-7c21-4ca4-3eef-08d9f5a7049a X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SA2PR02MB7530:EE_ X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 58D1YeZqnHX860YUNcFeTmpD7Z3cp9S+p8aIqHjUpl8MtVr2XoYJnzmuu8qfDHV1tF2yYdmriR5M2SasZVloCCyGA7NjZydstufpFCiR2jfUD0yvlGDjGFJaUK//cKQWZm0ej5Gmkr37SrR+9F/NDCdGI5Fiq9Zll355Jos1hNILLohcZ2paCaaK52OqQ+dJkBaDt6sYSm8293m3C88AJattk128MidJQzJOFb0vRRtSxmXovRpfw+Ax+NqZHPT1dqaGK51vyVzFW0ADBJdH6mhWdEapj/h+1jWbbQ8EwOYb05JBYRYGpOwLAkiybjkaS7JpbeYZcsThCjsnVQ0WSE0+IUSuj+aXga8pS8lGN0SwYiac/3iqBZcPYkh+OTYmPk6Gz+EsnT1jSXziizXMnrIAOLcIaRsoqqQZOHBsyriKRRihzbyzSFRxdByvSfZWQ7d1xASZ6/by/c+4GWGrbdHYU/i4+DiEVKs+2XS2BnUhLWmU6ze6EJ528BhuJfs3eVD/H2oXQwLsTNhXgCDTtZwrtzBDffgKQ4SxfEmT57nNoIbTWxnjDg7jv0yjZkYQptpLJCIWOzZaEFRw1W2T+arlM0U6/g8weHxka35SR+p7qyY65ClvssHPLtf8Skb2mF06eBqmrPw7RZoObXz873wY2O8cEUVJfWlf8aeldSVhfyNKGseqmP3guOOdHX6X/Lp/7Nn0IIDKDsZvgb93516Np92HQaWYYhpJgn3OR7Q= X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:149.199.80.198; CTRY:IE; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:CAL; SFV:NSPM; H:xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com; PTR:unknown-80-198.xilinx.com; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230001)(4636009)(36840700001)(46966006)(40470700004)(30864003)(6916009)(54906003)(426003)(83380400001)(2906002)(44832011)(40460700003)(53546011)(336012)(6666004)(31686004)(8936002)(47076005)(9786002)(36860700001)(36756003)(5660300002)(70206006)(82310400004)(26005)(186003)(2616005)(8676002)(4326008)(70586007)(356005)(31696002)(508600001)(316002)(7636003)(50156003)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: xilinx.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Feb 2022 01:59:53.2853 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b6c22416-7c21-4ca4-3eef-08d9f5a7049a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c; Ip=[149.199.80.198]; Helo=[xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM3NAM02FT003.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SA2PR02MB7530 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220221_175958_552392_14E8B104 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.75 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2/15/22 10:58 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:28:24AM -0800, Tanmay Shah wrote: >> This driver enables r5f dual core Real time Processing Unit subsystem >> available on Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale MPSoC Platform. RPU subsystem >> (cluster) can be configured in different modes e.g. split mode in which >> two r5f cores work independent of each other and lock-step mode in which >> both r5f cores execute same code clock-for-clock and notify if the >> result is different. >> >> The Xilinx r5 Remoteproc Driver boots the RPU cores via calls to the Xilinx >> Platform Management Unit that handles the R5 configuration, memory access >> and R5 lifecycle management. The interface to this manager is done in this >> driver via zynqmp_pm_* function calls. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky >> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah >> --- >> >> Changes in v3: >> - Fix checkpatch script indentation warning >> - Remove unused variable from xilinx remoteproc driver >> - use C style comments, i.e /*...*/ >> - Remove redundant debug information which can be derived using /proc/device-tree >> - Fix multilined comment format >> - s/"final fot TCM"/"final for TCM" >> - Function devm_kzalloc() does not return an code on error, just NULL. >> Remove redundant error check for this function throughout the driver. >> - Fix RPU mode configuration and add documentation accordingly >> - Get rid of the indentations to match function documentation style with rest of the driver >> - Fix memory leak by only using r5_rproc->priv and not replace it with new instance >> - Use 'i' for the outer loop and 'j' for the inner one as per convention >> - Remove redundant error and NULL checks throughout the driver >> - Use devm_kcalloc() when more than one element is required >> - Add memory-regions carveouts during driver probe instead of parse_fw call >> This removes redundant copy of reserved_mem object in r5_core structure. >> - Fix memory leak by using of_node_put() >> - Fix indentation of tcm_mem_map function args >> - Remove redundant init of variables >> - Initialize tcm bank size variable for lockstep mode >> - Replace u32 with phys_addr_t for variable stroing memory bank address >> - Add documentation of TCM behavior in lockstep mode >> - Use dev_get_drvdata instead of platform driver API >> - Remove info level messages >> - Fix checkpatch.pl warnings >> - Add documentation for the Xilinx r5f platform to understand driver design >> >> drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 12 + >> drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 973 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 986 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig >> index 166019786653..5637a71c0677 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig >> @@ -352,6 +352,18 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC >> It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing >> a slave processor. >> >> +config XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC >> + tristate "Xilinx R5 remoteproc support" >> + depends on PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP >> + depends on ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE >> + select RPMSG_VIRTIO >> + select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX >> + help >> + Say y or m here to support Xilinx R5 remote processors via the remote >> + processor framework. >> + >> + It's safe to say N if not interested in using RPU r5f cores. >> + >> endif # REMOTEPROC >> >> endmenu >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile >> index 5478c7cb9e07..91314a9b43ce 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile >> @@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC) += xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..ce2ac364b995 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,973 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/* >> + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver >> + * >> + */ >> + >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include > No mailboxes are used in this revision and as such the above are not needed. Sure I will remove them. >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include > As far as I can tell the above two includes are also not needed. Moreover > dma-mapping.h should be included because of dma_set_coherent_mask() and > DMA_BIT_MASK(). Ok I will add it and remove redundant headers. >> + >> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h" >> + >> +/* settings for RPU cluster mode */ >> +enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode { >> + SPLIT_MODE = 0, /* When cores run as separate processor */ >> + LOCKSTEP_MODE = 1, /* cores execute same code in lockstep,clk-for-clk */ >> + SINGLE_CPU_MODE = 2, /* core0 is held in reset and only core1 runs */ >> +}; >> + >> +/** >> + * struct mem_bank_data - Memory Bank description >> + * >> + * @addr: Start address of memory bank >> + * @size: Size of Memory bank >> + * @pm_domain_id: Power-domains id of memory bank for firmware to turn on/off >> + * @bank_name: name of the bank for remoteproc framework >> + */ >> +struct mem_bank_data { >> + phys_addr_t addr; >> + size_t size; >> + u32 pm_domain_id; >> + char *bank_name; >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks[] = { >> + {0xffe00000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */ >> + {0xffe20000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_BTCM, "btcm0"}, >> + {0xffe90000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_ATCM, "atcm1"}, >> + {0xffeb0000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_BTCM, "btcm1"}, >> +}; >> + >> +/** >> + * struct zynqmp_r5_core - ZynqMP R5 core structure >> + * >> + * @dev: device of RPU instance >> + * @np: device node of RPU instance >> + * @tcm_bank_count: number TCM banks accessible to this RPU >> + * @tcm_banks: array of each TCM bank data >> + * @rproc: rproc handle >> + * @pm_domain_id: RPU CPU power domain id >> + */ >> +struct zynqmp_r5_core { >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct device_node *np; >> + int tcm_bank_count; >> + struct mem_bank_data *tcm_banks; >> + struct rproc *rproc; >> + u32 pm_domain_id; >> +}; >> + >> +/** >> + * struct zynqmp_r5_cluster - ZynqMP R5 cluster structure >> + * >> + * @dev: r5f subsystem cluster device node >> + * @mode: cluster mode of type zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode >> + * @core_count: number of r5 cores used for this cluster mode >> + * @r5_cores: Array of pointers pointing to r5 core >> + */ >> +struct zynqmp_r5_cluster { >> + struct device *dev; >> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode mode; >> + int core_count; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores; >> +}; >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_set_mode - set RPU operation mode >> + * >> + * set RPU operation mode >> + * >> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core, >> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode rpu_mode) >> +{ >> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode; >> + int ret, reg_val; >> + >> + /* >> + * SINGLE CPU mode is not supported in driver yet. >> + * For now we only set lockstep mode or split mode. >> + */ >> + if (rpu_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) { >> + reg_val = 0; >> + } else if (rpu_mode == SPLIT_MODE) { >> + reg_val = 1; >> + } else if (rpu_mode == SINGLE_CPU_MODE) { >> + pr_err("RPU single cpu mode is not supported\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, reg_val); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + pr_err("failed to set RPU mode\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * At this point RPU is assumed to be configured only in >> + * lockstep mode or split mode. Configure TCM accordingly. >> + */ >> + tcm_mode = (rpu_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) ? >> + PM_RPU_TCM_COMB : PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT; >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + pr_err("failed to configure TCM\n"); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * >> + * Start R5 Core from designated boot address. >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) >> +{ >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv; >> + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem; >> + int ret; >> + >> + /* >> + * The exception vector pointers (EVP) refer to the base-address of >> + * exception vectors (for reset, IRQ, FIQ, etc). The reset-vector >> + * starts at the base-address and subsequent vectors are on 4-byte >> + * boundaries. >> + * >> + * Exception vectors can start either from 0x0000_0000 (LOVEC) or >> + * from 0xFFFF_0000 (HIVEC) which is mapped in the OCM (On-Chip Memory) >> + * >> + * Usually firmware will put Exception vectors at LOVEC. >> + * >> + * It is not recommend that you change the exception vector. >> + * Changing the EVP to HIVEC will result in increased interrupt latency >> + * and jitter. Also, if the OCM is secured and the Cortex-R5F processor >> + * is non-secured, then the Cortex-R5F processor cannot access the >> + * HIVEC exception vectors in the OCM. >> + */ >> + bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr >= 0xFFFC0000) ? >> + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC; >> + >> + dev_dbg(r5_core->dev, "RPU boot addr 0x%llx from %s.", rproc->bootaddr, >> + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM"); >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_wake(r5_core->pm_domain_id, 1, >> + bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO); >> + if (ret) >> + pr_err("failed to start RPU = 0x%x\n", r5_core->pm_domain_id); >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * >> + * Power down R5 Core. >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) >> +{ >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(r5_core->pm_domain_id, >> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING); >> + if (ret) >> + pr_err("failed to stop remoteproc RPU %d\n", ret); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_map >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * @mem: mem entry to map >> + * >> + * Callback to map va for memory-region's carveout. >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc, >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) >> +{ >> + void __iomem *va; >> + >> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len); >> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + mem->va = (void *)va; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap >> + * >> + * Unmap memory-region carveout >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc, >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) >> +{ >> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va); >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * add_mem_regions >> + * @r5_core: single R5 core's corresponding zynqmp_r5_core type instance >> + * @rmem: reserved mem region parsed from dt node >> + * >> + * Construct rproc mem carveouts from carveout provided in >> + * memory-region property >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int add_mem_regions_carveout(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core, >> + struct reserved_mem *rmem) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; >> + struct rproc *rproc; >> + >> + rproc = r5_core->rproc; >> + dev = r5_core->dev; >> + >> + /* Register associated reserved memory regions */ >> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, >> + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base, >> + rmem->size, rmem->base, >> + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_map, >> + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap, >> + rmem->name); >> + if (!mem) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap >> + * >> + * Unmap TCM banks when powering down R5 core. >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int tcm_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) >> +{ >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + int i; >> + u32 pm_domain_id; >> + >> + r5_core = rproc->priv; >> + if (!r5_core) { >> + pr_err("r5 core is not available\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va); >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; i++) { >> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id; >> + if (zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id)) >> + pr_warn("can't turn off TCM bank 0x%x", pm_domain_id); >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * tcm_mem_map >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * @mem: mem entry to initialize the va and da fields of >> + * >> + * Given TCM bank entry, this callback will set device address for R5 >> + * running on TCM and also setup virtual address for TCM bank >> + * remoteproc carveout. >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc, >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) >> +{ >> + void __iomem *va; >> + >> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len); >> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + /* Update memory entry va */ >> + mem->va = (void *)va; >> + >> + /* clear TCMs */ >> + memset_io(va, 0, mem->len); >> + >> + /* >> + * The R5s expect their TCM banks to be at address 0x0 and 0x2000, >> + * while on the Linux side they are at 0xffexxxxx. >> + * >> + * Zero out the high 12 bits of the address. This will give >> + * expected values for TCM Banks 0A and 0B (0x0 and 0x20000). >> + */ >> + mem->da &= 0x000fffff; >> + >> + /* >> + * TCM Banks 1A and 1B still have to be translated. >> + * >> + * Below handle these two banks' absolute addresses (0xffe90000 and >> + * 0xffeb0000) and convert to the expected relative addresses >> + * (0x0 and 0x20000). >> + */ >> + if (mem->da == 0x90000 || mem->da == 0xB0000) >> + mem->da -= 0x90000; >> + >> + /* if translated TCM bank address is not valid report error */ >> + if (mem->da != 0x0 && mem->da != 0x20000) { >> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "invalid TCM address: %x\n", mem->da); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(struct rproc *rproc) >> +{ >> + int i, num_banks, ret; >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; >> + u32 pm_domain_id; >> + phys_addr_t bank_addr; >> + size_t bank_size; >> + char *bank_name; >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + >> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv; >> + >> + dev = r5_core->dev; >> + >> + /* go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */ >> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count; >> + if (num_banks <= 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "need to specify TCM banks\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * Power-on Each 64KB TCM, >> + * register its address space, map and unmap functions >> + * and add carveouts accordingly >> + */ >> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) { >> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].addr; >> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].bank_name; >> + bank_size = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].size; >> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id; >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id, >> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0, >> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM carveout split mode %s addr=%llx, size=0x%lx", >> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size); >> + >> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr, >> + bank_size, bank_addr, >> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap, >> + bank_name); >> + if (!mem) { >> + /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */ >> + do { >> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id; >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id); >> + if (ret) >> + dev_warn(dev, >> + "fail to release node: 0x%x, %x\n", >> + pm_domain_id, ret); >> + } while (i--); >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } >> + >> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(struct rproc *rproc) >> +{ >> + int i, num_banks, ret; >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; >> + u32 pm_domain_id; >> + phys_addr_t bank_addr; >> + size_t bank_size = 0; >> + char *bank_name; >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + >> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv; >> + dev = r5_core->dev; >> + >> + /* Go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */ >> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count; >> + if (num_banks <= 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "need to specify TCM banks\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * In lockstep mode, TCM is contiguous memory block >> + * However, each TCM block still needs to be enabled individually. >> + * So, Enable each TCM block individually, but add their size >> + * to create contiguous memory region. >> + */ >> + bank_addr = r5_core->tcm_banks[0].addr; >> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[0].bank_name; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) { >> + bank_size += r5_core->tcm_banks[i].size; >> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id; >> + >> + /* Turn on each TCM bank individually */ >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id, >> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0, >> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM add carveout lockstep mode %s addr=0x%llx, size=0x%lx", >> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size); >> + >> + /* Register TCM address range, TCM map and unmap functions */ >> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr, >> + bank_size, bank_addr, >> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap, >> + bank_name); >> + if (!mem) { >> + /* In case of error, turn off TCM banks */ >> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) { >> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id; >> + ret = zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id); >> + if (ret) >> + dev_warn(dev, >> + "fail to release node: 0x%x ret: %x\n", >> + pm_domain_id, ret); >> + } >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } >> + >> + /* If registration is success, add carveouts */ >> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * add_tcm_banks() >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * >> + * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance >> + * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory >> + * needed for firmware to be loaded >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int add_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct platform_device *parent_pdev; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + >> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv; >> + if (!r5_core) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + dev = r5_core->dev; >> + >> + cluster = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent); >> + if (!cluster) { >> + dev_err(&parent_pdev->dev, "Invalid driver data\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * In lockstep mode TCM banks are one contiguous memory region of 256Kb >> + * In split mode, each TCM bank is 64Kb and not contiguous. >> + * We add memory carveouts accordingly. >> + */ >> + if (cluster->mode == SPLIT_MODE) >> + return add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(rproc); >> + else if (cluster->mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) >> + return add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(rproc); >> + >> + dev_err(cluster->dev, "invalid cluster mode\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw() >> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance >> + * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core >> + * >> + * When loading firmware, ensure the necessary carveouts are in remoteproc >> + * >> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + struct device *dev; >> + >> + r5_core = rproc->priv; >> + >> + dev = r5_core->dev; >> + >> + ret = add_tcm_banks(rproc); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get TCM banks, err %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw); >> + if (ret == -EINVAL) { >> + /* >> + * resource table only required for IPC. >> + * if not present, this is not necessarily an error; >> + * for example, loading r5 hello world application >> + * so simply inform user and keep going. >> + */ >> + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n"); >> + ret = 0; >> + } >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = { >> + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start, >> + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop, >> + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, >> + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw, >> + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, >> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, >> + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, >> +}; >> + >> +/** >> + * zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core() >> + * Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node >> + * this is called for each individual R5 core >> + * >> + * @cdev: Device node of each r5 core >> + * >> + * Return: zynqmp_r5_core object for success, error pointer in case of error. >> + */ >> +static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + struct rproc *r5_rproc; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + >> + /* Set up DMA mask */ >> + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(cdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); >> + if (ret) >> + return ERR_PTR(ret); >> + >> + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */ >> + r5_rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(cdev, dev_name(cdev), >> + &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops, >> + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core)); >> + if (!r5_rproc) { >> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to allocate memory for rproc instance\n"); >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >> + } >> + >> + r5_rproc->auto_boot = false; >> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)r5_rproc->priv; >> + r5_core->dev = cdev; >> + >> + /* Add R5 remoteproc core */ >> + ret = devm_rproc_add(cdev, r5_rproc); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(cdev, "failed to add r5 remoteproc\n"); >> + return ERR_PTR(ret); >> + } >> + >> + r5_core->rproc = r5_rproc; >> + return r5_core; >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node() >> + * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information >> + * in r5_core instance. We will use hardcoded TCM information from >> + * driver for now in this function. >> + * >> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object >> + * >> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure. >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster) >> +{ >> + int tcm_bank_count, tcm_node; >> + int i = 0, j; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + const struct mem_bank_data *tcm = zynqmp_tcm_banks; >> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev; >> + >> + /* >> + * ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver until >> + * system-dt spec is not final for TCM >> + */ >> + tcm_bank_count = ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_tcm_banks); >> + >> + /* count per core tcm banks */ >> + tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count / cluster->core_count; >> + >> + /* r5 core 0 will use all of TCM banks in lockstep mode. >> + * In split mode, r5 core0 will use 128k and r5 core1 will use another >> + * 128k. Assign TCM banks to each core accordingly >> + */ >> + tcm_node = 0; >> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) { >> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i]; >> + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count, >> + sizeof(struct mem_bank_data), >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!r5_core->tcm_banks) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + for (j = 0; j < tcm_bank_count; j++) { >> + /* Use pre-defined TCM reg values. >> + * Eventually this should be replaced by values >> + * parsed from dts. >> + */ >> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j].addr = tcm[tcm_node].addr; >> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j].size = tcm[tcm_node].size; >> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j].pm_domain_id = tcm[tcm_node].pm_domain_id; >> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j].bank_name = tcm[tcm_node].bank_name; >> + tcm_node++; >> + } >> + >> + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node() >> + * parse memory-region property from dt node and add >> + * memory region carveouts >> + * >> + * @r5_core: pointer to zynqmp_r5_core type object >> + * >> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure. >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core) >> +{ >> + int res_mem_count, i, ret; >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct device_node *np, *rmem_np; >> + struct reserved_mem *rmem; >> + >> + dev = r5_core->dev; >> + >> + np = r5_core->np; >> + >> + res_mem_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region", >> + sizeof(phandle)); >> + if (res_mem_count <= 0) { >> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get memory-region property %d\n", >> + res_mem_count); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < res_mem_count; i++) { >> + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i); >> + if (!rmem_np) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np); >> + if (!rmem) { >> + of_node_put(rmem_np); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + ret = add_mem_regions_carveout(r5_core, rmem); >> + if (ret) >> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get reserve mem regions %d\n", >> + ret); >> + >> + of_node_put(rmem_np); >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_core_init() >> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_core type object >> + * >> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object >> + * >> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure. >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster) >> +{ >> + int ret, i; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; >> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev; >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) { >> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i]; >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(r5_core); >> + if (ret) >> + dev_warn(dev, "memory-region prop failed %d\n", ret); >> + >> + /* Initialize r5 cores with power-domains parsed from dts */ >> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(r5_core->np, "power-domains", >> + 1, &r5_core->pm_domain_id); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get power-domains property\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, cluster->mode); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to set r5 cluster mode %d, err %d\n", >> + cluster->mode, ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_cluster_init() >> + * Create and initialize zynqmp_r5_cluster type object >> + * >> + * @cluster: pointer to zynqmp_r5_cluster type object >> + * >> + * Return: 0 for success and error code for failure. >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev; >> + struct device_node *dev_node = dev_of_node(dev); >> + struct device_node *child; >> + struct platform_device *child_pdev; >> + int core_count = 0, ret, i; >> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode cluster_mode = LOCKSTEP_MODE; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_core **r5_cores; >> + >> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &cluster_mode); >> + >> + /* >> + * on success returns 0, if not defined then returns -EINVAL, >> + * In that case, default is LOCKSTEP mode >> + */ >> + if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid xlnx,cluster-mode property\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * For now driver only supports split mode and lockstep mode. >> + * fail driver probe if either of that is not set in dts >> + */ >> + if (cluster_mode == SINGLE_CPU_MODE) { >> + dev_err(dev, "driver does not support single cpu mode\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } else if ((cluster_mode != SPLIT_MODE && >> + cluster_mode != LOCKSTEP_MODE)) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid cluster mode\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * Number of cores is decided by number of child nodes of >> + * r5f subsystem node in dts. If Split mode is used in dts >> + * 2 child nodes are expected. >> + * In lockstep mode if two child nodes are available, >> + * only use first child node and consider it as core0 >> + * and ignore core1 dt node. >> + */ >> + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev_node); >> + if (core_count <= 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) { >> + dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n"); >> + core_count = 1; >> + } >> + >> + r5_cores = devm_kcalloc(dev, core_count, >> + sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core *), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!r5_cores) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + i = 0; >> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_node, child) { >> + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(child); >> + if (!child_pdev) { >> + of_node_put(child); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> + /* create and add remoteproc instance of type struct rproc */ >> + r5_cores[i] = zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(&child_pdev->dev); >> + r5_cores[i]->dev = &child_pdev->dev; >> + if (!r5_cores[i]->dev) { >> + dev_err(dev, "can't get device for r5 core %d\n", i); >> + of_node_put(child); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> + r5_cores[i]->np = dev_of_node(r5_cores[i]->dev); >> + if (!r5_cores[i]->np) { >> + dev_err(dev, "can't get device node for r5 core %d\n", i); >> + of_node_put(child); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> + i++; >> + >> + /* >> + * If two child nodes are available in dts in lockstep mode, >> + * then ignore second child node. >> + */ >> + if (i == core_count) { >> + of_node_put(child); >> + break; >> + } >> + of_node_put(child); >> + } >> + >> + cluster->mode = cluster_mode; >> + cluster->core_count = core_count; >> + cluster->r5_cores = r5_cores; >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_r5_core_init(cluster); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core err %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static void zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(void *data) >> +{ >> + struct platform_device *pdev = (struct platform_device *)data; >> + >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); >> + >> + pr_info("Exit r5f subsystem driver\n"); >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe() >> + * >> + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster >> + * >> + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT, >> + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations >> + * >> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure. >> + */ >> +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster; >> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >> + >> + cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!cluster) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + cluster->dev = dev; >> + >> + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to populate platform dev %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; > Please use dev_err_probe() Ok. >> + } >> + >> + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */ >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster); >> + >> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit, pdev); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; > Not sure this is needed. The TI guys used that mechanic to release acquired > resources but merely setting driver data to NULL doesn't mandate all this. If I use zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit to free devices of r5_core using put_device( ) API then can I keep this? More on this in next email. >> + >> + ret = zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(cluster); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid r5f subsystem device tree\n"); >> + return ret; > Here to. > > More comments to come tomorrow. > > Thanks, > Mathieu > >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* Match table for OF platform binding */ >> +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = { >> + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", }, >> + { /* end of list */ }, >> +}; >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match); >> + >> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = { >> + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe, >> + .driver = { >> + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc", >> + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match, >> + }, >> +}; >> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver); >> + >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver"); >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc."); >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel