From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: ordering of check in phy_state_machine() since 06edf1a940be0633499e2feea31d380375a22bd9
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 12:33:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbaafccd-60ee-1c29-a014-ec50661f58eb@suse.com> (raw)
Hi,
looking at this I wonder whether the check isn't too late.
Do you really want to restart autonegotiation although
you know that the device is gone?
Regards
Oliver
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-31 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-31 10:33 Oliver Neukum [this message]
2022-03-31 10:51 ` ordering of check in phy_state_machine() since 06edf1a940be0633499e2feea31d380375a22bd9 Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fbaafccd-60ee-1c29-a014-ec50661f58eb@suse.com \
--to=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.