From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sagi Grimberg Subject: Re: [RFC 00/11] QLogic RDMA Driver (qedr) RFC Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:17:27 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1473696465-27986-1-git-send-email-Ram.Amrani@qlogic.com> <317f85a5-8890-e02e-6093-876f61aed1b5@grimberg.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Elior, Ariel" , Ram Amrani , "dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org" Cc: "Yuval.Mintz-h88ZbnxC6KDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "Ariel.Elior-h88ZbnxC6KDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "Michal.Kalderon-h88ZbnxC6KDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "rajesh.borundia-h88ZbnxC6KDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org >> > SRQ is not part of the RFC (but we do have it and NVMF was tested > with it). > >> > >> Nice, I have plans to make SRQs better usable for our ULPs so it'd be > >> good to have it. > > That’s good to know. Are there plans on implementing XRC? > > Right now it looks like none of the ULPS make use of it. The problem with XRC is that it needs to be reflected on the wire protocol for it to actually be useful for our ULPs. Not sure if its worth the effort... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html