From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752285AbdCCX2k (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2017 18:28:40 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50734 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751989AbdCCX2i (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2017 18:28:38 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/17] Documentation: kernel-parameters: Document owl earlycon To: Jonathan Corbet References: <20170224034055.18807-1-afaerber@suse.de> <20170224034055.18807-10-afaerber@suse.de> <20170303154650.4d959227@lwn.net> Cc: arm@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mp-cs@actions-semi.com, 96boards@ucrobotics.com, support@lemaker.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= Organization: SUSE Linux GmbH Message-ID: Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 00:28:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170303154650.4d959227@lwn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 03.03.2017 um 23:46 schrieb Jonathan Corbet: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:40:47 +0100 > Andreas Färber wrote: > >> + owl, >> + Start an early, polled-mode console on an Owl serial >> + port at the specified address. The serial port must >> + already be setup and configured. Options are not yet >> + supported. >> + > > Apologies, I'm just getting around to looking at this. > > Is there any chance of getting a version of it that (1) has a proper > changelog, and (2) better describes the applicability of this option. > Presumably if I don't know what an "Owl serial port" is I don't need it, > but maybe a phrase saying where such ports might be found would be helpful > here? Note that there is already a v3 of this patch. Both v2 and v3 do have a changelog, indicating that nothing changed here between versions. Did you mean commit message, and if so what would you like to see added exactly? Did you notice that most earlycon options are described like this? pl011, my meson, msm, lantiq all just repeat the driver name. In this case Owl is a family of Actions Semiconductor SoCs that are newly being enabled in this series - I can add the vendor name to the text, but no idea what else to say about "applicability"... While at it, it is really ugly for both users and contributors that there is no consistent (e.g., alphabetical) order of these options. Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: afaerber@suse.de (=?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?=) Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 00:28:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 09/17] Documentation: kernel-parameters: Document owl earlycon In-Reply-To: <20170303154650.4d959227@lwn.net> References: <20170224034055.18807-1-afaerber@suse.de> <20170224034055.18807-10-afaerber@suse.de> <20170303154650.4d959227@lwn.net> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am 03.03.2017 um 23:46 schrieb Jonathan Corbet: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:40:47 +0100 > Andreas F?rber wrote: > >> + owl, >> + Start an early, polled-mode console on an Owl serial >> + port at the specified address. The serial port must >> + already be setup and configured. Options are not yet >> + supported. >> + > > Apologies, I'm just getting around to looking at this. > > Is there any chance of getting a version of it that (1) has a proper > changelog, and (2) better describes the applicability of this option. > Presumably if I don't know what an "Owl serial port" is I don't need it, > but maybe a phrase saying where such ports might be found would be helpful > here? Note that there is already a v3 of this patch. Both v2 and v3 do have a changelog, indicating that nothing changed here between versions. Did you mean commit message, and if so what would you like to see added exactly? Did you notice that most earlycon options are described like this? pl011, my meson, msm, lantiq all just repeat the driver name. In this case Owl is a family of Actions Semiconductor SoCs that are newly being enabled in this series - I can add the vendor name to the text, but no idea what else to say about "applicability"... While at it, it is really ugly for both users and contributors that there is no consistent (e.g., alphabetical) order of these options. Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)