From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50698C04AB6 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 20:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292A821019 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 20:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="MP1DMZFD"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=lohutok.net header.i=@lohutok.net header.b="K/NfjojY" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726425AbfE1USz (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2019 16:18:55 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:64770 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727070AbfE1USy (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2019 16:18:54 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B666FC09 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 16:18:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from allison@lohutok.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=subject:to :references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=hpMDRo9pgLnU 1BTWqtbT2BFJ+L4=; b=MP1DMZFD9hyZ1e9QWAqpvGzusdVS5PuY4nz4Ch9bk3UH 7yvy4V1lg3pO6FGUJpO/d34Axc/UXE9M5yWLMQz51Reu8jqJBMt5q0HxrhxkCxd5 GHFxQrZk9P1LNdkxg4lxAhWdcu8UPTI+xe+CE6eZiCttBVzX7IoG0GfCv0BjozM= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8F56FC08 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 16:18:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from allison@lohutok.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lohutok.net; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=2018-11.pbsmtp; bh=CBcHxdvxSBvjibVzXd2Jt/eOpGuWhH3dpju/GgD6NBo=; b=K/NfjojYWs9p4kWQk8Nq28YcYweYknhO7sNQkjZs8jjQ42jONeHfQVbUb5u7s5arWR619X+LdU7q1mPhAWhi4Yrj4KBwhVftrb5vZEbOrXId7RgDPdtMQ6lh6+x4h3pdKcVV5sxKv5SIL8B5vuuwuX1/Js3ClTtLohedaETD6Xg= Received: from [10.0.0.75] (unknown [24.47.52.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B24486FC03 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 16:18:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from allison@lohutok.net) Subject: Re: [Batch 9 patch 03/23] treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 178 To: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org References: <20190528165704.089944150@linutronix.de> <20190528170026.162703968@linutronix.de> From: Allison Randal Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 16:18:47 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190528170026.162703968@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CE01D310-8185-11E9-940B-B0405B776F7B-44123303!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org On 5/28/19 12:57 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > From: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de > > Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): > > this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify > it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by > the free software foundation either version 2 of the license > > extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier > > GPL-2.0-only > > has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 24 file(s). > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner It doesn't explicitly say "or later", and the lingering "either" doesn't seem like enough to go on, so agreed that -only is the best fit. Reviewed-by: Allison Randal