All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc: "David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] certs: Fix blacklist flag type confusion
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:15:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc4d5812-238c-baf7-d7f6-cc123bdb855d@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YAepvxOBcEU0paqA@kernel.org>


On 20/01/2021 04:55, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:03PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>>
>> KEY_FLAG_KEEP is not meant to be passed to keyring_alloc() or key_alloc(),
>> as these only take KEY_ALLOC_* flags.  KEY_FLAG_KEEP has the same value as
>> KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION, but fortunately only key_create_or_update()
>> uses it.  LSMs using the key_alloc hook don't check that flag.
>>
>> KEY_FLAG_KEEP is then ignored but fortunately (again) the root user cannot
>> write to the blacklist keyring, so it is not possible to remove a key/hash
>> from it.
>>
>> Fix this by adding a KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP flag that tells key_alloc() to set
>> KEY_FLAG_KEEP on the new key.  blacklist_init() can then, correctly, pass
>> this to keyring_alloc().
> 
> OK, so thing work by luck now, but given the new patches which allow
> to append new keys they would break, right?

Without this fix, patch 9/10 would allow to remove and modify keys from
the blacklist keyring.

> 
>> We can also use this in ima_mok_init() rather than setting the flag
>> manually.
> 
> What does ima_mok_init() do?

This was initially an addition from David Howells, I only fixed the
argument bit-ORing. ima_mok_init() allocates a blacklist keyring (with
different properties) dedicated to IMA.

>> Note that this doesn't fix an observable bug with the current
>> implementation but it is required to allow addition of new hashes to the
>> blacklist in the future without making it possible for them to be removed.
>>
>> Fixes: 734114f8782f ("KEYS: Add a system blacklist keyring")
>> cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Nit: Cc

OK

> 
>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
>> Reported-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>> [mic@linux.microsoft.com: fix ima_mok_init()]
>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> * Cherry-pick rewritten v1 patch from
>>   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2659836.1607940186@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
>>   to rebase on v5.11-rc3 and fix ima_mok_init().
>> ---
>>  certs/blacklist.c                | 2 +-
>>  include/linux/key.h              | 1 +
>>  security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c | 4 +---
>>  security/keys/key.c              | 2 ++
>>  4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
>> index a888b934a1cd..029471947838 100644
>> --- a/certs/blacklist.c
>> +++ b/certs/blacklist.c
>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static int __init blacklist_init(void)
>>  			      KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ |
>>  			      KEY_USR_SEARCH,
>>  			      KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA |
>> -			      KEY_FLAG_KEEP,
>> +			      KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP,
>>  			      NULL, NULL);
>>  	if (IS_ERR(blacklist_keyring))
>>  		panic("Can't allocate system blacklist keyring\n");
>> diff --git a/include/linux/key.h b/include/linux/key.h
>> index 0f2e24f13c2b..eed3ce139a32 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/key.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/key.h
>> @@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ extern struct key *key_alloc(struct key_type *type,
>>  #define KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN		0x0004	/* Key is built into kernel */
>>  #define KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION	0x0008	/* Override the check on restricted keyrings */
>>  #define KEY_ALLOC_UID_KEYRING		0x0010	/* allocating a user or user session keyring */
>> +#define KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP		0x0020	/* Set the KEEP flag on the key/keyring */
>>  
>>  extern void key_revoke(struct key *key);
>>  extern void key_invalidate(struct key *key);
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
>> index 36cadadbfba4..5594dd38ab04 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
>> @@ -38,13 +38,11 @@ __init int ima_mok_init(void)
>>  				(KEY_POS_ALL & ~KEY_POS_SETATTR) |
>>  				KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ |
>>  				KEY_USR_WRITE | KEY_USR_SEARCH,
>> -				KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA,
>> +				KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA | KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP,
>>  				restriction, NULL);
>>  
>>  	if (IS_ERR(ima_blacklist_keyring))
>>  		panic("Can't allocate IMA blacklist keyring.");
>> -
>> -	set_bit(KEY_FLAG_KEEP, &ima_blacklist_keyring->flags);
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  device_initcall(ima_mok_init);
>> diff --git a/security/keys/key.c b/security/keys/key.c
>> index ebe752b137aa..c45afdd1dfbb 100644
>> --- a/security/keys/key.c
>> +++ b/security/keys/key.c
>> @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ struct key *key_alloc(struct key_type *type, const char *desc,
>>  		key->flags |= 1 << KEY_FLAG_BUILTIN;
>>  	if (flags & KEY_ALLOC_UID_KEYRING)
>>  		key->flags |= 1 << KEY_FLAG_UID_KEYRING;
>> +	if (flags & KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP)
>> +		key->flags |= 1 << KEY_FLAG_KEEP;
>>  
>>  #ifdef KEY_DEBUGGING
>>  	key->magic = KEY_DEBUG_MAGIC;
>> -- 
>> 2.30.0
>>
> 
> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> 
> /Jarkko
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-20 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-14 15:18 [PATCH v3 00/10] Enable root to update the blacklist keyring Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-14 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] certs/blacklist: fix kernel doc interface issue Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-20  3:39   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-14 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] certs: Fix blacklisted hexadecimal hash string check Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-20  3:43   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 11:12     ` Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-20 23:44       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-14 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] PKCS#7: Fix missing include Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-20  3:44   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-14 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] certs: Fix blacklist flag type confusion Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-20  3:55   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 11:15     ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2021-01-20 23:45       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-14 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] certs: Replace K{U,G}IDT_INIT() with GLOBAL_ROOT_{U,G}ID Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-20  5:15   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 11:17     ` Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-20 23:48       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-14 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] certs: Make blacklist_vet_description() more strict Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-20  4:16   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 11:23     ` Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-14 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] certs: Factor out the blacklist hash creation Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-14 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] certs: Check that builtin blacklist hashes are valid Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-20  5:19   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 11:57     ` Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-20 23:53       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-21  9:18         ` Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-21 15:21           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-14 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] certs: Allow root user to append signed hashes to the blacklist keyring Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-15 13:06   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-20  5:23   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 11:24     ` Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-14 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] tools/certs: Add print-cert-tbs-hash.sh Mickaël Salaün
2021-01-15  9:28 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] Enable root to update the blacklist keyring Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fc4d5812-238c-baf7-d7f6-cc123bdb855d@digikod.net \
    --to=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.