All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>
To: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com>,
	OpenEmbedded Devel List
	<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Splitting meta-oe?
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 07:23:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc8783c5-a576-3caa-d44a-9bf030da42c3@balister.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180317035021.GA19189@linux-uys3>

On 03/16/2018 08:50 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On Tue 2018-02-20 @ 11:41:15 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> The separate layers and maintainership is the way we designed the new
>> layered approach to OE to scale.
> 
> I only became an active user of OE after the OE-classic split; I had used it a
> couple times during the OE-classic era, but not very deeply. Therefore: my
> apologies for not having a fuller understanding of the issue(s).
> 
> Would anyone like to make an honest, unbiased attempt at answering:
> 1. What problem(s) was the post-OE-classic split attempting to solve?

The all in one approach is untestable.

> 2. Did it work? Can it be said that the problem(s) the OE-split was attempting
>    to solve, have actually been solved by the split? (and, if new problems
>    arose as a result of this split, were they small an manageable relative to
>    the pre-split problems?)
> 

OE-core is well tested, and that has taken a lot of resources. There are
not dedicated resources to test much beyond this. The real problem is
how to get resources to test layers beyond oe-core. And maintain testing
of oe-core.

Philip


> The experiment to decide whether we need more splits or consolidation has
> already been done. Have the results been sufficiently understood?
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-17 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-20 10:45 Splitting meta-oe? Burton, Ross
2018-02-20 14:15 ` Joe MacDonald
2018-02-20 16:50 ` akuster808
2018-02-20 17:13   ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-02-20 18:52     ` Khem Raj
2018-02-21  0:51       ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-02-21  8:49         ` Martin Jansa
2018-02-21  9:06           ` Martin Jansa
2018-02-21  9:48             ` Andrea Adami
2018-02-21 10:22               ` Martin Jansa
2018-02-21 14:02                 ` Joe MacDonald
2018-02-21 14:14                   ` Burton, Ross
2018-02-21 14:58                     ` Patrick Ohly
2018-02-21 15:01                       ` Otavio Salvador
2018-02-21 19:33                       ` Andreas Oberritter
2018-02-22  9:18                         ` Patrick Ohly
2018-02-21 14:20                   ` Tom Rini
2018-02-21 14:44                     ` Joe MacDonald
2018-02-21 13:34           ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-02-21 13:38             ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-02-21 13:45           ` Joe MacDonald
2018-02-21 13:55             ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-02-21 13:59               ` Otavio Salvador
2018-02-20 17:46   ` Richard Purdie
2018-02-20 18:00     ` Tim Orling
2018-02-20 18:28       ` Martin Jansa
2018-02-20 18:40       ` Khem Raj
2018-02-20 18:52         ` Richard Purdie
2018-02-20 19:15           ` Khem Raj
2018-02-20 21:55             ` Richard Purdie
2018-02-20 22:27               ` Martin Jansa
2018-02-20 23:17                 ` Andreas Müller
2018-02-20 23:41                 ` Richard Purdie
2018-03-17  3:50                   ` Trevor Woerner
2018-03-17 14:23                     ` Philip Balister [this message]
2018-03-18  5:49                       ` Trevor Woerner
2018-02-21  0:07           ` Otavio Salvador
2018-02-21  0:10             ` Otavio Salvador
2018-02-21 13:57               ` Tom Rini
2018-02-21 14:00                 ` Otavio Salvador
2018-02-21 14:48                   ` Tom Rini
2018-02-21 14:09                 ` Martin Hundebøll
2018-02-22  6:53                   ` Jonas Bonn
2018-02-22  9:27                     ` Patrick Ohly
2018-02-22  9:40                       ` Otavio Salvador
2018-02-21 15:54           ` Patrick Ohly
2018-02-20 20:32         ` akuster808
2018-02-20 19:06     ` Khem Raj
2018-02-20 16:54 ` Vesa Jääskeläinen
2018-02-20 18:49 ` Khem Raj
2018-02-28 17:17 ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-02-28 21:33   ` Andreas Müller
2018-03-01  1:20     ` akuster808
2018-03-01  8:46     ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-03-01  1:17   ` akuster808
2018-03-01  9:04     ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-03-01 18:44       ` akuster808
2018-03-01 18:46         ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-03-01 22:11         ` Bruce Ashfield
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-02-17 17:07 Burton, Ross
2017-02-17 17:24 ` Andreas Müller
2017-02-17 18:02   ` Martin Jansa
2017-02-17 18:28     ` Joe MacDonald
2017-02-17 19:45       ` Philip Balister
2017-02-20  3:31         ` Richard Purdie
2017-02-20  4:28           ` Joe MacDonald
2017-02-20 11:18           ` Martin Jansa
2017-02-22 16:15             ` akuster808
2017-02-17 20:54       ` Andreas Müller
2017-02-18 21:35     ` Burton, Ross
2017-02-17 21:55 ` akuster808
2017-02-18  0:53 ` Khem Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fc8783c5-a576-3caa-d44a-9bf030da42c3@balister.org \
    --to=philip@balister.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=twoerner@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.