All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] IMA: remove -Wmissing-prototypes warning
@ 2021-06-29 13:50 Austin Kim
  2021-06-29 14:30 ` Mimi Zohar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Austin Kim @ 2021-06-29 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zohar, dmitry.kasatkin, jmorris, serge
  Cc: linux-integrity, linux-security-module, linux-kernel, austin.kim,
	austindh.kim

From: Austin Kim <austin.kim@lge.com>

With W=1 build, the compiler throws warning message as below:

   security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c:24:12: warning:
   no previous prototype for ‘ima_mok_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
       __init int ima_mok_init(void)

Silence the warning by adding static keyword to ima_mok_init().

Signed-off-by: Austin Kim <austin.kim@lge.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
index 1e5c01916173..95cc31525c57 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ struct key *ima_blacklist_keyring;
 /*
  * Allocate the IMA blacklist keyring
  */
-__init int ima_mok_init(void)
+static __init int ima_mok_init(void)
 {
 	struct key_restriction *restriction;
 
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] IMA: remove -Wmissing-prototypes warning
  2021-06-29 13:50 [PATCH] IMA: remove -Wmissing-prototypes warning Austin Kim
@ 2021-06-29 14:30 ` Mimi Zohar
  2021-06-29 22:40   ` Austin Kim
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mimi Zohar @ 2021-06-29 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Austin Kim, dmitry.kasatkin, jmorris, serge
  Cc: linux-integrity, linux-security-module, linux-kernel, austin.kim,
	Petko Manolov

[Cc: Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com>]

Hi Austin,

On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 14:50 +0100, Austin Kim wrote:
> From: Austin Kim <austin.kim@lge.com>
> 
> With W=1 build, the compiler throws warning message as below:
> 
>    security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c:24:12: warning:
>    no previous prototype for ‘ima_mok_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>        __init int ima_mok_init(void)
> 
> Silence the warning by adding static keyword to ima_mok_init().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Austin Kim <austin.kim@lge.com>
> ---
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
> index 1e5c01916173..95cc31525c57 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ struct key *ima_blacklist_keyring;
>  /*
>   * Allocate the IMA blacklist keyring
>   */
> -__init int ima_mok_init(void)
> +static __init int ima_mok_init(void)
>  {
>  	struct key_restriction *restriction;
>  

Thank you for the patch, which does fix the warning.   The .ima_mok
keyring was removed a while ago.  With all the recent work on the
system blacklist, I'm wondering if anyone is still using the IMA
blacklist keyring or whether it should be removed as well.

thanks,

Mimi


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] IMA: remove -Wmissing-prototypes warning
  2021-06-29 14:30 ` Mimi Zohar
@ 2021-06-29 22:40   ` Austin Kim
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Austin Kim @ 2021-06-29 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mimi Zohar
  Cc: dmitry.kasatkin, James Morris, Serge E. Hallyn, linux-integrity,
	linux-security-module, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	김동현,
	Petko Manolov

2021년 6월 29일 (화) 오후 11:30, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>님이 작성:
>
> [Cc: Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com>]
>
> Hi Austin,
>
> On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 14:50 +0100, Austin Kim wrote:
> > From: Austin Kim <austin.kim@lge.com>
> >
> > With W=1 build, the compiler throws warning message as below:
> >
> >    security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c:24:12: warning:
> >    no previous prototype for ‘ima_mok_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >        __init int ima_mok_init(void)
> >
> > Silence the warning by adding static keyword to ima_mok_init().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Austin Kim <austin.kim@lge.com>
> > ---
> >  security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
> > index 1e5c01916173..95cc31525c57 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
> > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ struct key *ima_blacklist_keyring;
> >  /*
> >   * Allocate the IMA blacklist keyring
> >   */
> > -__init int ima_mok_init(void)
> > +static __init int ima_mok_init(void)
> >  {
> >       struct key_restriction *restriction;
> >
>
> Thank you for the patch, which does fix the warning.   The .ima_mok
> keyring was removed a while ago.  With all the recent work on the
> system blacklist, I'm wondering if anyone is still using the IMA
> blacklist keyring or whether it should be removed as well.

Oh! Thanks for information.

>
> thanks,
>
> Mimi
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-29 22:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-29 13:50 [PATCH] IMA: remove -Wmissing-prototypes warning Austin Kim
2021-06-29 14:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-06-29 22:40   ` Austin Kim

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.