From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11615C433F5 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB2D61222 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231440AbhJCUP6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Oct 2021 16:15:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58696 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230303AbhJCUP5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Oct 2021 16:15:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95866C0613EC; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 13:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id p13so28411863edw.0; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:14:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RlS0v3/Rhlf3ts75tCU+bjZnRbKsqMQBA94Qzb/r/xs=; b=CC+Mi9BoczOtWghdFEfFfYoZU2BCYTjx1L1Gx4pY0rC5I8wQ0dD9OjUbIZy8i+QZP5 dB0SNXNBXHU+SnV5k4MuEV0KbMuRDSaif1Agy563c2lTweyXn8M9Y4ScUFroldGrMC+0 5e31UZuiQW3yuGIpMa9vY+nqko+voDN5Co9scrAZfW7OZjSNrRybE1sSnJUpFJHeuRWK Sl9WAipKNC3Qw03rotmZ+ugZCx/jU/UyOhvOOY7e7owxT70NlIC/YWc6YU/mwrjl/sKe EvYdMYX3x5HNIGQQe9SnQD/0q+PGyW9WN2Djge4GaE1lIX4KTUfKfK1YVezpVl9IwY8B JDlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RlS0v3/Rhlf3ts75tCU+bjZnRbKsqMQBA94Qzb/r/xs=; b=1cxrmepgBfPrzMGEyiPdiESLJ6Spa4oARspRsT4H/fXPqizXuN+RS2D3+vWyFlksmj Aqjm//4KSmyRVyxFdsjSaoCAG+uqigklBu3+CFyYZXwW5yPYKUKaQn3206XZ4Bb+VLIj SViZns8IK4i/8tsx2RlCaPeNijKLQTDnwuMAo4bg3LsbXUKtClNbKoBvbHpa/9HRb2z0 U43SPnH6p7wSlfUm8HUm5mlJuyM+OZ4tM85yWNLebc/TnXajOuXSBMJyuT0I1VHS6Kbm M7uEp0OOpjfQHO/VF5xxyjgYlsQxrnGOG7QIM0ngzdZj+xvJJogObGpReAJCwGc/XOn7 /GpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531sHq/cdCJ+BtHrTQSalebD/gcaNvwL4TYAsE9MclmJP+na+oUh UC1yeFyB1yzXiqy2OWs/ex6BdWSNNds= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+4s6eEX7JvBs7hlLuxUNVhz/OLNv/vWxNn1GCq22LKuedbNlbm+zDWONLDD5iIxbKvHJDsw== X-Received: by 2002:a50:e009:: with SMTP id e9mr13070257edl.254.1633292048113; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:981:6fec:1:c4f3:8ed5:bdee:bf6c? ([2001:981:6fec:1:c4f3:8ed5:bdee:bf6c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm5585605ejc.19.2021.10.03.13.14.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] PCI: PM: Simplify and unify some helper functions To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux ACPI Cc: Linux PCI , LKML , Bjorn Helgaas , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg References: <1800633.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher> <7312660.EvYhyI6sBW@kreacher> From: Ferry Toth Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 22:14:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7312660.EvYhyI6sBW@kreacher> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi, Op 29-09-2021 om 20:05 schreef Rafael J. Wysocki: > Hi All, > > This series is on top of the linux-next branch from linux-pm.git: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next > > which should be included in linux-next. > > Two of the 3 patches in this series, [1-2/3], were included in the "PCI: ACPI: > Get rid of struct pci_platform_pm_ops and clean up code" series: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/1800633.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher/ > > and the remaining one, [3/3] is a new version of a problematic patch from that > series. The rest of that series is present in the git branch above. > > All of the 3 patches in this set need to be tested in order to verify that > there are no more issues that need to be addressed in them. > > Ferry, please test! This is how I tested: 3 patches from https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/2793105.e9J7NaK4W3@kreacher/ on top of 5.15.0-rc2 as before 4 patches from v2 in the order of linux-pm.git then tested without, with 1/3, 1+2/3, 1+2+3/3 on top (with only 3/3 the new patch, 1+2/3 taken from v2 as they are unchanged). In all 4 cases I didn't find any trouble (related to this patch). Thanks for doing this! > Thanks! > > > >