From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CA05C433EF for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 06:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9863CA08B for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 08:43:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D2FF3C649E for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 08:43:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.jv-coder.de (mail.jv-coder.de [5.9.79.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC0FE1400B7C for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 08:43:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.178.40] (unknown [188.192.100.83]) by mail.jv-coder.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F6ED9FE98; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 06:43:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jv-coder.de; s=dkim; t=1657003406; bh=6krwBjwsj0zUqIS8eMcU1wjDfgq+UsxsA+YDIG+s5VA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=tfE7qP7+00iW54XQ0oi9T5+KpttoBdKi4Ljb8oEDwGIys8AptxMmxJTOPhRzXvPa0 SASr1qk3seKS91S70IQXXecLFQ841fO1lhx1z1zYWlJhhgDPtqnsNiEIGYl2wr9nOM r1Kb01ngGWtjpYqnUuBsc77F/BRLti77wLmiKrjI= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 08:43:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Content-Language: en-US To: rpalethorpe@suse.de References: <20220627125321.1560677-1-lkml@jv-coder.de> <20220627125321.1560677-3-lkml@jv-coder.de> <87czekrseu.fsf@suse.de> From: Joerg Vehlow In-Reply-To: <87czekrseu.fsf@suse.de> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/3] openposix: Setup autoconf and fix installation layout X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Joerg Vehlow Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi, Am 7/5/2022 um 7:57 AM schrieb Richard Palethorpe: > Hello Joerg, > > Joerg Vehlow writes: >> +AC_PROG_CC_C99 > > This causes a deprecation warning for me I think autoconf developers messed up here. They obsoleted the macro in 2.70 and told users to replace it with just AC_PROG_CC, which defaults to C11, but also excepts C89. It is not possible (without adding more code), to verify if the required C version is available. What is even worse, that autoconf does not fallback to a version, where this was still not obsolete, even if an older autoconf version is defined in AC_PREREQ. Nevertheless, I guess in case of C99, we can just switch to AC_PROG_CC, because every compiler should support C99 nowadays. I just wanted to be explicit, because C99 us currenty selected in the CFLAGS file, that I dropped. Joerg -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp