From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C471EC2D0A8 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 530E42080A for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="WaXq3i1g" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 530E42080A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kMquf-0005lV-94; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:01:45 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kMque-0005lK-Cn for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:01:44 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 726871cb-ce63-440d-aab5-dea35f89a6c1 Received: from mx2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.15]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 726871cb-ce63-440d-aab5-dea35f89a6c1; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:01:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1601290903; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CenzWT0+htNohYcB8mL2GQ4JbyBefC7VjC6YZI9XB+U=; b=WaXq3i1g9HUvqVRp+FzE6BIfJ8w1eBx6dEdhiAop3tsEgkutz4My2ymTxxh3nocMyrsVN9 zwqAzhtoAUayXWtrNOKxS7rpB7VgULlOmKbs+HAAjPGnn/EvGHFzHzyN+njIFEZNAGPKzY 9RdVbdCD10azjIygnBBIblVvtD4E0pw= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DD5AD82; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:01:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [PATCH 10/12] evtchn/fifo: use stable fields when recording "last queue" information From: Jan Beulich To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Cc: Andrew Cooper , George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , Julien Grall , Wei Liu , Stefano Stabellini References: <0d5ffc89-4b04-3e06-e950-f0cb171c7419@suse.com> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:01:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0d5ffc89-4b04-3e06-e950-f0cb171c7419@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" Both evtchn->priority and evtchn->notify_vcpu_id could, prior to recent locking adjustments, change behind the back of evtchn_fifo_set_pending(). Neither the queue's priority nor the vCPU's vcpu_id fields have similar properties, so they seem better suited for the purpose. In particular they reflect the respective evtchn fields' values at the time they were used to determine queue and vCPU. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/common/event_fifo.c +++ b/xen/common/event_fifo.c @@ -246,8 +246,8 @@ static void evtchn_fifo_set_pending(stru /* Moved to a different queue? */ if ( old_q != q ) { - evtchn->last_vcpu_id = evtchn->notify_vcpu_id; - evtchn->last_priority = evtchn->priority; + evtchn->last_vcpu_id = v->vcpu_id; + evtchn->last_priority = q->priority; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&old_q->lock, flags); spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);