From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffsj2-0007Lr-0E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:07:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffsiw-0003MV-Fs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:07:03 -0400 Received: from relay3.mail.vrmd.de ([81.28.224.24]:39089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffsiw-0003Il-74 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:06:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 22:06:49 +0200 From: Sebastian Bauer In-Reply-To: <20180718023053.GD2102@umbus.fritz.box> References: <20180716025346.GF2599@umbus.fritz.box> <20180718023053.GD2102@umbus.fritz.box> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] hw/display/sm501* status List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Gibson Cc: Peter Maydell , BALATON Zoltan , Magnus Damm , Aurelien Jarno , Gerd Hoffmann , QEMU Developers Hi, Am 2018-07-18 04:30, schrieb David Gibson: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 09:43:05PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 16 July 2018 at 21:26, BALATON Zoltan wrote: >> > I could list sm501 in the sam460ex section thus formally taking >> > sub-maintainership but this would only go as far that I'll get cc-d on >> > changes and try to review them. I still can't (and don't want to) maintain >> > my own tree and send pull requests directly so I'd need someone's help with >> > that who can take my patches and merge them via their tree. If it's OK to >> > continue to use the PPC tree for that I'm fine with that if David agrees >> > (which I think he did above). >> > >> > So is it OK to add sm501 to sam460ex section so I claim responsibility for >> > changes and will continue sending patches cc-ing David (and maybe Gerd to >> > help spotting problems) then David could take these via the PPC tree? >> >> I think that makes sense. sh4 is pretty dead and if sm501's major >> active user is the sam460ex then listing it there seems reasonable. > > Sounds good to me. > > Zoltan, can you send a patch adding sm501 to the sam460ex section of > the MAINTAINERS file. That will make you the right point of contact > for it. > > On the understanding that it's just about tree logistics, rather than > review, I'll be happy to take sm501 patches from you through my tree. Zoltan, if you like you can also add me as a possible reviewer for anything that is Sam460ex-related. Bye Sebastian