All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
To: "chuck.lever@oracle.com" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	"trondmy@kernel.org" <trondmy@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bfields@redhat.com" <bfields@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Reduce contention for the nfsd_file nf_rwsem
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 18:00:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff7400e35ec0b227de4546c608d231caed921d5b.camel@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1669C849-D7DC-46C1-B6B6-F2C79C819710@oracle.com>

On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 16:49 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> Hi-
> 
> > On Jun 17, 2021, at 7:26 PM, trondmy@kernel.org wrote:
> > 
> > From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> > 
> > When flushing out the unstable file writes as part of a COMMIT
> > call, try
> > to perform most of of the data writes and waits outside the
> > semaphore.
> > 
> > This means that if the client is sending the COMMIT as part of a
> > memory
> > reclaim operation, then it can continue performing I/O, with
> > contention
> > for the lock occurring only once the data sync is finished.
> > 
> > Fixes: 5011af4c698a ("nfsd: Fix stable writes")
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> 
> The good news is I've found no functional regressions. The bad
> news is I haven't seen any difference in performance. Is there
> a particular test that I can run to observe improvement?

I'd expect that re-exported NFS would be the best test since fsync() is
a high latency operation when the page cache is loaded. You also want
to use a client with relatively limited memory so that it will try to
reclaim memory by pushing out dirty pages and doing COMMIT.

> 
> I wonder about adding a Fixes: tag for a change that the patch
> description describes as an optimization.

I've occasionally hit OOM situations in the re-export case when the r/w
lock contention causes softerr failure to be serialised.
i.e. if the server is down, and you're essentially hoping that the nfsd
threads will give up and return EJUKEBOX/NFS4ERR_DELAY to the client,
then that lock ensures that threads fail one-by-one (grab lock, write,
timeout, release lock) instead of being able to all fail at once
(write, timeout).

> 
> 
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > index 15adf1f6ab21..46485c04740d 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > @@ -1123,6 +1123,19 @@ nfsd_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct
> > svc_fh *fhp, loff_t offset,
> > }
> > 
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V3
> > +static int
> > +nfsd_filemap_write_and_wait_range(struct nfsd_file *nf, loff_t
> > offset,
> > +                                 loff_t end)
> > +{
> > +       struct address_space *mapping = nf->nf_file->f_mapping;
> > +       int ret = filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, offset, end);
> > +
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               return ret;
> > +       filemap_fdatawait_range_keep_errors(mapping, offset, end);
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> >  * Commit all pending writes to stable storage.
> >  *
> > @@ -1153,10 +1166,11 @@ nfsd_commit(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct
> > svc_fh *fhp,
> >         if (err)
> >                 goto out;
> >         if (EX_ISSYNC(fhp->fh_export)) {
> > -               int err2;
> > +               int err2 = nfsd_filemap_write_and_wait_range(nf,
> > offset, end);
> > 
> >                 down_write(&nf->nf_rwsem);
> > -               err2 = vfs_fsync_range(nf->nf_file, offset, end,
> > 0);
> > +               if (!err2)
> > +                       err2 = vfs_fsync_range(nf->nf_file, offset,
> > end, 0);
> >                 switch (err2) {
> >                 case 0:
> >                         nfsd_copy_boot_verifier(verf,
> > net_generic(nf->nf_net,
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1
> > 
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com



  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-21 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-17 23:26 [PATCH] nfsd: Reduce contention for the nfsd_file nf_rwsem trondmy
2021-06-18 17:59 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-21 16:49 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-21 18:00   ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2021-06-21 18:27     ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-21 19:06       ` Trond Myklebust
2021-06-21 19:35         ` Trond Myklebust
2021-06-22 14:51 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-23 21:38 ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff7400e35ec0b227de4546c608d231caed921d5b.camel@hammerspace.com \
    --to=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.