All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>
To: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	<jingoohan1@gmail.com>, <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>,
	<kishon@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@axis.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Niklas Cassel <niklass@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: fix crash seen due to missing ops
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:47:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ffb1d92b-a637-2ed9-51d3-6b9fbb790635@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170321144354.15452-1-niklass@axis.com>


Hi Niklas,

Às 2:43 PM de 3/21/2017, Niklas Cassel escreveu:
> From: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>
> 
> Fix the following crash, seen in dwc/pcie-artpec6.
> 
>   Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004
>   pgd = c0204000
>   [00000004] *pgd=00000000
>   Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM
>   Modules linked in:
>   CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc3-next-20170321 #1
>   Hardware name: Axis ARTPEC-6 Platform
>   task: db098000 task.stack: db096000
>   PC is at dw_pcie_writel_dbi+0x2c/0xd0
>   ...
> 
> While at it, fix the same problem for pcie-designware-plat.
> 
> Fixes: 442ec4c04d12 ("PCI: dwc: all: Split struct pcie_port into host-only and core structures")
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c         | 4 ++++
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c
> index fcd3ef845883..6d23683c0892 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,9 @@ static int artpec6_add_pcie_port(struct artpec6_pcie *artpec6_pcie,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> +};
> +
>  static int artpec6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -252,6 +255,7 @@ static int artpec6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	pci->dev = dev;
> +	pci->ops = &dw_pcie_ops;
>  
>  	artpec6_pcie->pci = pci;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c
> index b6c832ba39dd..f20d494922ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ static int dw_plat_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> +};
> +
>  static int dw_plat_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -103,6 +106,7 @@ static int dw_plat_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	pci->dev = dev;
> +	pci->ops = &dw_pcie_ops;
>  
>  	dw_plat_pcie->pci = pci;
>  
> 

In the case of pcie-designware-plat you have the declaration of pci->ops:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/tree/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c#n78

and in artpec6 in here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/tree/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c#n226

Both declarations are made previously of calling dw_pcie_host_init(), so why do
you need this dummy ops in the probe function? I never had that necessity.

Thanks,
Joao

Thanks,

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-22 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-21 14:43 [PATCH] PCI: dwc: fix crash seen due to missing ops Niklas Cassel
2017-03-22 15:47 ` Joao Pinto [this message]
2017-03-23  7:40   ` Niklas Cassel
2017-03-27  5:43     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2017-03-29 11:21       ` Niklas Cassel
     [not found]   ` <e6cf73c0-f930-c29a-8caa-843320ec5f8a@axis.com>
2017-03-27 16:26     ` Joao Pinto
2017-04-03 23:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-04-04  7:54   ` Niklas Cassel
2017-04-04 13:54     ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ffb1d92b-a637-2ed9-51d3-6b9fbb790635@synopsys.com \
    --to=joao.pinto@synopsys.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@axis.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.cassel@axis.com \
    --cc=niklass@axis.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.