From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28B9C433ED for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 01:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3567611F0 for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 01:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230322AbhEMBbu (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2021 21:31:50 -0400 Received: from smtp.bonedaddy.net ([45.33.94.42]:33298 "EHLO smtp.bonedaddy.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229630AbhEMBbs (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2021 21:31:48 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.209] (n49-190-168-235.per1.wa.optusnet.com.au [49.190.168.235]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pabs3@bonedaddy.net) by smtp.bonedaddy.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75DC5180043; Wed, 12 May 2021 21:31:12 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: smtp.bonedaddy.net; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=bonedaddy.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bonedaddy.net; s=mail; t=1620869477; bh=jo6L1Lp7McpbL1Z7cGpI5dwqXVJEwyplDJ1NRFFYviA=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=LsxNjlV/IZszm2EOz/GRJeP3ns1jeQTNoK7R7ldZYkPbaCcdEo2Nu7e5020j5wg7X p5RIQ9ADSISR+e7omHY35IiO9+kHvax3WU017wr9B+NqFrm4EIH6A0iwboZ61jjcLg qtEXHowM7FuhoBhkFPfhDmdgcLjWguG6fIQM7ibnY9t0QU5bdZs8HSxrQUw0cxLm2B NW80sl+JDrlVGW4PeqGbRHYKQekA6PrRZWmZD1whM2WiTpYRuiae84hyjaRJudrdB1 JRDeWuu2q/ekbOLQAJ+cEepU+ry0X54vONw60GPCi4BaSON2lZC7tGjtEyCSWTWVWC Qgx8wBTWGFa3A== Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] sched,delayacct: Some cleanups From: Paul Wise To: Mel Gorman Cc: Balbir Singh , Peter Zijlstra , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, bristot@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, riel@surriel.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org In-Reply-To: <20210512130058.GJ3672@suse.de> References: <20210505105940.190490250@infradead.org> <20210505222940.GA4236@balbir-desktop> <20210507123810.GB4236@balbir-desktop> <20210512113419.GF3672@suse.de> <9524e77d054f380e4711eaf68344ebba2d1271be.camel@bonedaddy.net> <20210512130058.GJ3672@suse.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-oxFvlExZTgu9NltSQ5vc" Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 09:29:38 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.1-1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-oxFvlExZTgu9NltSQ5vc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 14:00 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > If you send me the same patch, I can do submit a request to the devel > package for openSUSE. I don't have commit access but I would be surprised > if the package maintainer didn't accept the request. Obviously, I'll > build+boot a kernel that includes the final version of this series in > case of any naming changes or other oddities. At this point I'm not clear exactly what needs to be done and whether or not the details have been nailed down enough that it is time to commit the change to the iotop-py and iotop-c git repositories. I recommend upgrading the openSUSE iotop package to the latest git commit rather than just applying the latest patch on top. Alternatively, once the patch is applied I can probably overstep my permissions and add a tag to the iotop-py git repository, in case folks are happy to pull from the git repository instead of the website. > Good thinking. I'll open a bug on github when I've tested your iotop > patch so that the bug report is more coherent. OK, sounds good. PS: does Linux have a facility for userspace processes to convert syscall names to numbers for the currently running Linux kernel? I noticed that iotop-py just hard-codes the syscall numbers for ioprio_set and ioprio_get on common arches, missing newer arches. --=20 bye, pabs https://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ --=-oxFvlExZTgu9NltSQ5vc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEYQsotVz8/kXqG1Y7MRa6Xp/6aaMFAmCcgP4ACgkQMRa6Xp/6 aaPPXxAAkN9epwOw3XK0bdtOoltH0wOnGHPnNcyh8LeRjNyaNcIuz/m+g2s9M3dH s5SXKsNNJPj/UKQd+IA7zDE32qOwq+Vn2IspWjhJ7pLrcXIu8MNAcWoHyrJ3/Duo 025aTp+XoNqEL0PUJ+plsnC+3sTYFBiMxobkXgOUiJD6qxTypTEAxFyw4byUhsZl 2y4VPKFSWQy+oZwpWvmHiZ6W8h71iZzGrBDrhBpWEqvkx1Xeu4z317xZHYqAWSvR CGUVMGC5uYcZqnUFl0PNJ94fnKVcu1JL06gdPBsTLUfeK+n0aVVB+8ZUSrli5Wc1 tcCGPG8XOdOFmDiPZX5xy1F7tdJl1uBTDYzB4r3+LcYJphrmOy13XTUmcgAtrqJk HF7FJLalkmJ4VHO6wWZtCzQVYTz36vXCZEtJJLd/3blScwP61kWyaNKc5jhvAN7J Cj2xAPg1kkD1SAR2QoCW2kQK8h9luA/oeYycRcm2Lk08R9krXVtwX5tzgQYwjn57 QFiZJoicyFvEAEh/lZWdc+2HEXuYAfYp0BFqhxEn/PTImlEbm7jV7DzUAAR+5fRm eKm380DSQ1ZORqWwb92olgIiKfobLubUX/5b5iczSAu4ENgaHXjQ1Lrgp5WFR9nY h4VBFZiVXrjWOOlFJ0s7M1fhEKKYI41sc6e196mv38TG9NrZbwA= =t0Gt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-oxFvlExZTgu9NltSQ5vc--