From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755409AbdC1QQK (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:16:10 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:35145 "EHLO mail-pg0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754688AbdC1QQE (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:16:04 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] perf annotate: Fix missing number of samples for source_line_samples To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo References: <1490703125-13643-1-git-send-email-treeze.taeung@gmail.com> <20170328134824.GA17135@kernel.org> <20170328152837.GB17135@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Wang Nan , Masami Hiramatsu , Jiri Olsa , Martin Liska From: Taeung Song Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:15:43 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170328152837.GB17135@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/29/2017 12:28 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:21:33PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu: >> >> >> On 03/28/2017 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>> Em Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:12:05PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu: >>>> The option 'show-total-period' works fine without a option '-l'. >>>> But if running 'perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period', >>>> you can see a problem showing only zero '0' for number of samples. >>> >>> If you do that at that point, don't you have to change the TUI not to do >>> it again? >>> >>> - Arnaldo >>> >> >> Yes, there isn't the same problem when using 't' on TUI of 'perf annotate'. >> (As you know, 't' is show-total-period option) > > Yeah, there is no problem on the TUI, but since you do it in a function > taht the TUI uses, it may not be needed to do this in No, TUI don't use the function I modified in this patch at all. (i.e. symbol__get_source_line()) Only symbol__tty_annotate() use symbol__get_source_line(). (As you know, annotate TUI use symbol__tui_annotate() ) > tools/perf/util/annotate.c _and_ in tools/perf/ui/browsers/annotate.c, > right? > > - Arnaldo Are there something I missed or misunderstand ? Thanks, Taeung > >> In 'annotate' TUI, we can use the 't' functionality without the problem. >> Because of the code (util/annotate.c:911 and ui/browsers/annotate.c:412) as >> below. >> >> 881 double disasm__calc_percent(struct annotation *notes, int evidx, s64 >> offset, >> 882 s64 end, const char **path, u64 >> *nr_samples) >> 883 { >> ... >> 910 if (h->sum) { >> 911 *nr_samples = hits; >> >> And, >> >> 378 static void annotate_browser__calc_percent(struct annotate_browser >> *browser, >> 379 struct perf_evsel *evsel) >> 380 { >> ... >> 407 bpos->samples[i].percent = >> disasm__calc_percent(notes, >> 408 evsel->idx + i, >> 409 pos->offset, >> 410 next ? next->offset : >> len, >> 411 &path, &nr_samples); >> 412 bpos->samples[i].nr = nr_samples; >> >> >> And 'perf annotate --stdio --show-total-period' hasn't the problem, too. >> Because of the same code (util/annotate.c:911). >> >> >> But if with '-l', i.e. 'perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period', >> the problem happen. Because 'nr' of source_line_samples aren't ordinarily >> set >> in symbol__get_source_line() (util/annotate.c:1634~..) >> ,so fix it as this patch >> >> Are there something I missed or misunderstand ? >> >> >> Thanks, >> Taeung >> >> >>>> Before: >>>> $ perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period >>>> ... >>>> 0 : 400816: push %rbp >>>> 0 : 400817: mov %rsp,%rbp >>>> 0 : 40081a: mov %edi,-0x24(%rbp) >>>> 0 : 40081d: mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp) >>>> 0 : 400821: mov -0x24(%rbp),%eax >>>> 0 : 400824: mov -0x30(%rbp),%rdx >>>> 0 : 400828: mov (%rdx),%esi >>>> 0 : 40082a: mov $0x0,%edx >>>> ... >>>> >>>> The reason is it was missed to set number of samples >>>> of source_line_samples, so set it ordinarily. >>>> >>>> After: >>>> $ perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period >>>> ... >>>> 3 : 400816: push %rbp >>>> 4 : 400817: mov %rsp,%rbp >>>> 0 : 40081a: mov %edi,-0x24(%rbp) >>>> 0 : 40081d: mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp) >>>> 1 : 400821: mov -0x24(%rbp),%eax >>>> 2 : 400824: mov -0x30(%rbp),%rdx >>>> 0 : 400828: mov (%rdx),%esi >>>> 1 : 40082a: mov $0x0,%edx >>>> ... >>>> >>>> Cc: Namhyung Kim >>>> Cc: Jiri Olsa >>>> Cc: Martin Liska >>>> Fixes: 0c4a5bcea460 ("perf annotate: Display total number of samples with --show-total-period") >>>> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song >>>> --- >>>> tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 6 ++++-- >>>> tools/perf/util/annotate.h | 2 +- >>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c >>>> index 11af5f0..a37032b 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c >>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c >>>> @@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map, >>>> start = map__rip_2objdump(map, sym->start); >>>> >>>> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { >>>> - u64 offset; >>>> + u64 offset, nr_samples; >>>> double percent_max = 0.0; >>>> >>>> src_line->nr_pcnt = nr_pcnt; >>>> @@ -1674,12 +1674,14 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map, >>>> double percent = 0.0; >>>> >>>> h = annotation__histogram(notes, evidx + k); >>>> + nr_samples = h->addr[i]; >>>> if (h->sum) >>>> - percent = 100.0 * h->addr[i] / h->sum; >>>> + percent = 100.0 * nr_samples / h->sum; >>>> >>>> if (percent > percent_max) >>>> percent_max = percent; >>>> src_line->samples[k].percent = percent; >>>> + src_line->samples[k].nr = nr_samples; >>>> } >>>> >>>> if (percent_max <= 0.5) >>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h >>>> index 09776b5..948aa8e 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h >>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h >>>> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct cyc_hist { >>>> struct source_line_samples { >>>> double percent; >>>> double percent_sum; >>>> - double nr; >>>> + u64 nr; >>>> }; >>>> >>>> struct source_line { >>>> -- >>>> 2.7.4