From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hallvard Breien Furuseth Subject: Re: best way to fastforward all tracking branches after a fetch Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:05:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1kc5m38.m71ik21ytxkhbM%lists@haller-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gelonida@gmail.com (Gelonida N), git@vger.kernel.org To: lists@haller-berlin.de (Stefan Haller) X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 13 20:06:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RaXfr-0003ZS-Fb for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:05:59 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753077Ab1LMTFy (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:05:54 -0500 Received: from mail-out1.uio.no ([129.240.10.57]:55288 "EHLO mail-out1.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751750Ab1LMTFy (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:05:54 -0500 Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29]) by mail-out1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1RaXfj-0001yV-5I; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:05:51 +0100 Received: from bombur.uio.no ([129.240.6.233]) by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RaXfi-0005Pl-PV; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:05:51 +0100 Received: by bombur.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2112) id 5FB241158; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:05:50 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1kc5m38.m71ik21ytxkhbM%lists@haller-berlin.de> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 23.1.1 X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 3 msgs/h 1 sum rcpts/h 3 sum msgs/h 1 total rcpts 2020 max rcpts/h 17 ratelimit 0 X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-7.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.023,UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO) X-UiO-Scanned: 0B6ADBA98B23D726FE227E4E10F40D1D3DF2017E X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.6.233 spam_score: -69 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 1 total 868 max/h 5 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Stefan Haller writes: >Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: >> Local branches can track each other. So the script needs to toposort >> the branches, or to loop until either nothing was done or an error >> happened. (The latter to prevent an eternal loop on error.) > > Is this just theoretical, or are there real use cases for this? What > would be a workflow with such a local tracking branch? Personally I don't care much, I just noted that the script did not match the question in the subject line. -- Hallvard