All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Checksums.ini again - new format this time
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:42:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <hckha6$1ud$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200910291241.35265.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl>

On 29-10-09 12:41, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I know that checksums.ini returns many times on ML so many of you are bored
> with it. But I have some stuff to show/share about it.
>
> Sometime ago new format was suggested for conf/checksums.ini and I implemented
> it today. It looks simple and is simple:
>
> [archivename]
> url0=url-to-sources
> url1=alternative-url-to-sources
> url2=another-alternative-url-to-sources
> md5=md5sum
> sha256=sha256sum
>
> What differs from old implementation? Use of archive names instead of urls so
> no more "I fetch from my local Debian mirror and got hit by lack of checksums"
> etc problems. By default OE does not even care about urls - it just checks for
> section by archive name and use md5/sha256 sums to check does file is the
> proper one. Urls can be used by source mirror building tools.
>
> How many changes are needed? Few:
>
> 1. 3 lines patch to base.bbclass
> 2. new checksums sorter
> 3. old checksums ->  new checksums converter
>
> I think that it would be nice to switch to that.
>
> Ideas? Opinions?

Even though the cabal apparantly doesn't want people to respond to your 
idea, I'm going to respond anyway.

I like your idea and think we should implement it. I'm not sure how the 
urlX entries would benefit my usecase, but I suppose it doesn't hurt to 
have them.

regards,

Koen




  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-01 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-29 11:41 Checksums.ini again - new format this time Marcin Juszkiewicz
2009-10-29 11:43 ` Phil Blundell
2009-10-29 13:19   ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-01 17:42 ` Koen Kooi [this message]
2009-11-01 20:35 ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-11-01 22:59   ` Andrea Adami
2009-11-02  2:09     ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-11-09  6:53       ` Petr Štetiar
2009-11-10 11:39         ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-11-02  2:06   ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-11-02  8:41     ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-02  9:07       ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-11-02  9:26         ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-11-02  9:19     ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2009-11-02  9:18   ` Marcin Juszkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='hckha6$1ud$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.