From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NCYw9-0003Cp-HS for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:26:40 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NCYul-0002GX-5s for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:25:11 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:25:11 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:25:11 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:24:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20091115163618.GA3317@jama> <1258364356.5799.94.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20091122190547.GC3349@jama> <1258978516.10321.79.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <4B0A803D.8080600@balister.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.6pre) Gecko/20091109 Shredder/3.0pre In-Reply-To: <4B0A803D.8080600@balister.org> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: SRCPV migration - How SRCPV works! X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:26:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 23-11-09 13:29, Philip Balister wrote: > On 11/23/2009 07:15 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 09:07 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> On 22-11-09 20:05, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> >>>> Every git recipe in OE tree should have some sane hash stored in >>>> conf/distro/include/sane-srcrevs.inc >>> >>> The cabal decided that checksums are "part of the metadata" and belongs >>> in the recipes. I don't understand why SRCREVs are so different. For >>> SRCREVs my life would be a lot easier if all SRCREV where put in their >>> respective recipes. Distros can always do >>> >>> SRCREV_pn-foo = "bar" >>> PV_pn-foo = "1.2.3+gitr$SRCPV" >>> >>> in their distro.conf if needed. Due to scoping we do need some include >>> for EFL_SRCREV, since those recipes are tightly tied together. >> >> FWIW I dislike it that we have SRCREVs elsewhere. There is a problem >> (bug?) with bitbake that makes this necessary though and that bug is >> hard to fix :(. > > The difference between checksums and SRCREV's is that there is one > checksum per file, but different distro's may use different versions of > the same software. And that makes it not part of the metadata? regards, Koen