From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Tramnitz Subject: Re: [pvops xen/next ][iommu] attenpt to passthrough PCI-e usb controllor to PV domU: (XEN) traps.c:2309:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 000000000000008b from 00000a07:00000000 to 00000000:00000000. Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:22:16 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1017192770.20100321221949@eikelenboom.it> <1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B21D641D6D@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20100322090450.GA1878@reaktio.net> <4BA734BD.5030305@intel.com> <20100322091917.GB1878@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100322091917.GB1878@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org At 22.03.2010 10:19, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > > Yeah, that's what I meant. Ok. > > I thought it was also possible to use VT-d for a PV guest? no? > > -- Pasi It is, but this requires iommu=3Dpv as hypervisor boot flag. With iommu=3D1 you can see in the hypervisor log that VTd will be disable= d=20 for PV. Best regards, Christian