From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Mueller Subject: Re: PATCH: ceph.spec.in Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 19:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4C2E412E.1010408@chaschperli.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:60187 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751220Ab0GBTpe (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:45:34 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUmB2-0000VX-Hb for ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:45:32 +0200 Received: from 80-219-106-215.dclient.hispeed.ch ([80.219.106.215]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:45:32 +0200 Received: from thomas by 80-219-106-215.dclient.hispeed.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:45:32 +0200 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Am Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:42:38 +0200 schrieb Thomas Mueller: > On 02.07.2010 17:04, Sage Weil wrote: >> Applied this, sans the unpackaged files part.. those are for debugging >> and testing, and don't need to be installed. (That probably means >> 'make install' should ignore them...) > > as long as they are installed with "make install" (at least with mock) > the build of the packages fail with the message that there are > unpackaged files and no rpm's are produced. > > > - Thomas PS: maybe only build these binarys with debug enabled?