All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
To: kvalo@codeaurora.org
Cc: luca@coelho.fi, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] iwlwifi: mvm: d3: make key reprogramming iteration optional
Date: Thu,  5 Aug 2021 13:19:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <iwlwifi.20210805130823.c6f77325c430.I798ce9d757492a9e3d223c1de5d4e62ebbc00b2c@changeid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210805101934.431479-1-luca@coelho.fi>

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Now that only reprogramming is left in the initial key iteration,
skip it entirely on unified firmware images instead of skipping
only the command sending inside of it.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/d3.c | 102 +++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/d3.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/d3.c
index 61490f17a1fa..ad7308cc4b7f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/d3.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/d3.c
@@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ static const u8 *iwl_mvm_find_max_pn(struct ieee80211_key_conf *key,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-struct wowlan_key_data {
-	bool error, configure_keys;
+struct wowlan_key_reprogram_data {
+	bool error;
 	int wep_key_idx;
 };
 
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void iwl_mvm_wowlan_program_keys(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 {
 	struct iwl_mvm *mvm = IWL_MAC80211_GET_MVM(hw);
 	struct iwl_mvm_vif *mvmvif = iwl_mvm_vif_from_mac80211(vif);
-	struct wowlan_key_data *data = _data;
+	struct wowlan_key_reprogram_data *data = _data;
 	int ret;
 
 	switch (key->cipher) {
@@ -152,18 +152,14 @@ static void iwl_mvm_wowlan_program_keys(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 			wkc.wep_key.key_offset = data->wep_key_idx;
 		}
 
-		if (data->configure_keys) {
-			mutex_lock(&mvm->mutex);
-			ret = iwl_mvm_send_cmd_pdu(mvm, WEP_KEY, 0,
-						   sizeof(wkc), &wkc);
-			data->error = ret != 0;
-
-			mvm->ptk_ivlen = key->iv_len;
-			mvm->ptk_icvlen = key->icv_len;
-			mvm->gtk_ivlen = key->iv_len;
-			mvm->gtk_icvlen = key->icv_len;
-			mutex_unlock(&mvm->mutex);
-		}
+		mutex_lock(&mvm->mutex);
+		ret = iwl_mvm_send_cmd_pdu(mvm, WEP_KEY, 0, sizeof(wkc), &wkc);
+		data->error = ret != 0;
+
+		mvm->ptk_ivlen = key->iv_len;
+		mvm->ptk_icvlen = key->icv_len;
+		mvm->gtk_ivlen = key->iv_len;
+		mvm->gtk_icvlen = key->icv_len;
 
 		/* don't upload key again */
 		return;
@@ -190,30 +186,28 @@ static void iwl_mvm_wowlan_program_keys(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 		break;
 	}
 
-	if (data->configure_keys) {
-		mutex_lock(&mvm->mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&mvm->mutex);
+	/*
+	 * The D3 firmware hardcodes the key offset 0 as the key it
+	 * uses to transmit packets to the AP, i.e. the PTK.
+	 */
+	if (key->flags & IEEE80211_KEY_FLAG_PAIRWISE) {
+		mvm->ptk_ivlen = key->iv_len;
+		mvm->ptk_icvlen = key->icv_len;
+		ret = iwl_mvm_set_sta_key(mvm, vif, sta, key, 0);
+	} else {
 		/*
-		 * The D3 firmware hardcodes the key offset 0 as the key it
-		 * uses to transmit packets to the AP, i.e. the PTK.
+		 * firmware only supports TSC/RSC for a single key,
+		 * so if there are multiple keep overwriting them
+		 * with new ones -- this relies on mac80211 doing
+		 * list_add_tail().
 		 */
-		if (key->flags & IEEE80211_KEY_FLAG_PAIRWISE) {
-			mvm->ptk_ivlen = key->iv_len;
-			mvm->ptk_icvlen = key->icv_len;
-			ret = iwl_mvm_set_sta_key(mvm, vif, sta, key, 0);
-		} else {
-			/*
-			 * firmware only supports TSC/RSC for a single key,
-			 * so if there are multiple keep overwriting them
-			 * with new ones -- this relies on mac80211 doing
-			 * list_add_tail().
-			 */
-			mvm->gtk_ivlen = key->iv_len;
-			mvm->gtk_icvlen = key->icv_len;
-			ret = iwl_mvm_set_sta_key(mvm, vif, sta, key, 1);
-		}
-		mutex_unlock(&mvm->mutex);
-		data->error = ret != 0;
+		mvm->gtk_ivlen = key->iv_len;
+		mvm->gtk_icvlen = key->icv_len;
+		ret = iwl_mvm_set_sta_key(mvm, vif, sta, key, 1);
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&mvm->mutex);
+	data->error = ret != 0;
 }
 
 struct wowlan_key_rsc_tsc_data {
@@ -839,30 +833,30 @@ static int iwl_mvm_wowlan_config_key_params(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
 {
 	bool unified = fw_has_capa(&mvm->fw->ucode_capa,
 				   IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_CNSLDTD_D3_D0_IMG);
-	struct wowlan_key_data key_data = {
-		.configure_keys = !unified,
-	};
+	struct wowlan_key_reprogram_data key_data = {};
 	struct iwl_mvm_vif *mvmvif = iwl_mvm_vif_from_mac80211(vif);
 	int ret;
 	u8 cmd_ver;
 	size_t cmd_size;
 
-	/*
-	 * if we have to configure keys, call ieee80211_iter_keys(),
-	 * as we need non-atomic context in order to take the
-	 * required locks.
-	 */
-	/*
-	 * Note that currently we don't use CMD_ASYNC in the iterator.
-	 * In case of key_data.configure_keys, all the configured commands
-	 * are SYNC, and iwl_mvm_wowlan_program_keys() will take care of
-	 * locking/unlocking mvm->mutex.
-	 */
-	ieee80211_iter_keys(mvm->hw, vif, iwl_mvm_wowlan_program_keys,
-			    &key_data);
+	if (!unified) {
+		/*
+		 * if we have to configure keys, call ieee80211_iter_keys(),
+		 * as we need non-atomic context in order to take the
+		 * required locks.
+		 */
+		/*
+		 * Note that currently we don't use CMD_ASYNC in the iterator.
+		 * In case of key_data.configure_keys, all the configured
+		 * commands are SYNC, and iwl_mvm_wowlan_program_keys() will
+		 * take care of locking/unlocking mvm->mutex.
+		 */
+		ieee80211_iter_keys(mvm->hw, vif, iwl_mvm_wowlan_program_keys,
+				    &key_data);
 
-	if (key_data.error)
-		return -EIO;
+		if (key_data.error)
+			return -EIO;
+	}
 
 	ret = iwl_mvm_wowlan_config_rsc_tsc(mvm, vif);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.32.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-05 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-05 10:19 [PATCH 00/12] iwlwifi: updates intended for v5.15 2021-08-05 Luca Coelho
2021-08-05 10:19 ` [PATCH 01/12] iwlwifi: mvm: d3: separate TKIP data from key iteration Luca Coelho
2021-08-26 20:35   ` Luca Coelho
2021-08-05 10:19 ` [PATCH 02/12] iwlwifi: mvm: d3: remove fixed cmd_flags argument Luca Coelho
2021-08-05 10:19 ` [PATCH 03/12] iwlwifi: mvm: d3: refactor TSC/RSC configuration Luca Coelho
2021-08-05 10:19 ` [PATCH 04/12] iwlwifi: mvm: d3: add separate key iteration for GTK type Luca Coelho
2021-08-05 10:19 ` Luca Coelho [this message]
2021-08-05 10:19 ` [PATCH 06/12] iwlwifi: mvm: d3: implement RSC command version 5 Luca Coelho
2021-08-05 10:19 ` [PATCH 07/12] iwlwifi: mvm: silently drop encrypted frames for unknown station Luca Coelho
2021-08-05 10:19 ` [PATCH 08/12] iwlwifi: mvm: Refactor setting of SSIDs for 6GHz scan Luca Coelho
2021-08-05 10:19 ` [PATCH 09/12] iwlwifi: mvm: fix access to BSS elements Luca Coelho
2021-08-05 10:19 ` [PATCH 10/12] iwlwifi: rename ACPI_SAR_NUM_CHAIN_LIMITS to ACPI_SAR_NUM_CHAINS Luca Coelho
2021-08-05 10:19 ` [PATCH 11/12] iwlwifi: convert flat SAR profile table to a struct version Luca Coelho
2021-08-05 10:19 ` [PATCH 12/12] iwlwifi: remove ACPI_SAR_NUM_TABLES definition Luca Coelho

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=iwlwifi.20210805130823.c6f77325c430.I798ce9d757492a9e3d223c1de5d4e62ebbc00b2c@changeid \
    --to=luca@coelho.fi \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.