From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RELDz-0007Ao-8P for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:21:27 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1REL8S-0008NM-0H for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:15:44 +0200 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:15:43 +0200 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:15:43 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:15:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <201109222337.30836.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> <201109251506.30431.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> <201110102141.56124.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 In-Reply-To: <201110102141.56124.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Subject: Re: [meta-oe] do_rootfs fails with networkmanager (was network-manager-applet) included X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:21:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 10-10-11 21:41, Andreas Müller schreef: > On Monday, October 10, 2011 12:19:53 PM Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 25-09-11 15:06, Andreas Müller schreef: >>> On Thursday, September 22, 2011 11:37:30 PM Andreas Müller wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> For my xfce-image ( lives in meta-angstrom/recipes-angstrom/images >>>> ) I want to make use of network-manager-applet which came in meta >>>> oe few days ago. >>>> >>>> It seems that as soon as I add network-manager-applet do_rootfs >>>> fails with something like: >>>> >>>> >>>> | Configuring openssh-sftp. | Configuring xf86-input-evdev. | >>>> Configuring cpufrequtils. | Configuring systemd-compat-units. | >>>> Configuring gvfsd-ftp. | Collected errors: | * extract_archive: >>>> Cannot create symlink from ./var/run to 'volatile/run': File >>>> exists. | + '[' '!' -z '' ']' | + >>>> package_tryout_install_multilib_ipk | + multilib_tryout_dirs= | + >>>> '[' '!' -z >>>> /home/Superandy/tmp/oe-core-eglibc/work/overo-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/xfce-base-image-1.0-r0/multilib_check.py >>>> >>>> ']' | | ERROR: Function 'do_rootfs' failed (see >>>> /home/Superandy/tmp/oe-core-eglibc/work/overo-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/xfce-base-image-1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.28313 >>>> >>>> for further information) NOTE: package xfce-base-image-1.0-r0: task >>>> do_rootfs: Failed ERROR: Task 8 >>>> (/home/Superandy/data/oe-core/sources/meta-angstrom/recipes-angstrom/images/xfce-base-image.bb, >>>> >>>> do_rootfs) failed with exit code '1' ERROR: >>>> '/home/Superandy/data/oe-core/sources/meta-angstrom/recipes-angstrom/images/xfce-base-image.bb' >>>> >>>> failed >>>> >>> Looked around a bit for this issue. As soon as there is >>> networkmanager included, do_rootfs fails with with something like >>> >>> | Collected errors: | * extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from >>> ./var/run to 'volatile/run': File exists. >>> >>> In 'image'-folder of networkmanager I find a folder >>> 'var/run/NetworkManager'. At do_rootfs this folder has moved to >>> '/var/volatile/run/NetworkManager' ( see >>> /-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/volatile). >>> >>> >>> Seems as do_rootfs tries to setup a link 'var/run' where still a >>> (remaining) folder is present - or the transition from var/run -> >>> var/volatile/run is somehow incomplete. >>> >>> Any ideas how - or especially where to fix ( not only for >>> networkmanager I guess ). Maybe this is an oe-core issue but there no >>> networkmanager is available... >> >> I've finally managed to reproduce this! I vaguely recall you finding >> out some more details, could you please give a summary of your >> finding? >> >> regards, >> >> koen >> >> > Hi Koen, > > In historical order trying not to cause confusion this time :-) > > 1. I found a conflict between OE-Core creating /var/run-symlink by > 'package.bbclass' together with 'meta/files/fs-perms.txt' on the one side > and angstrom 'base-files_3.0.14.bbappend' trying to create > /var/run-directory on the other side. I sent a patch [1] which fixed the > issue. Unfortunately I was a bit over-enthusiastic and sent the patch > together with [2] in a series. 2. On the first run, I recognized, that > the second part of the series caused missing directories and wrote that > in [3]. Here I meant to skip only the _second_ part of the series. 3. > You committed a workaround for /var/run issue [4]. 4. I asked if this is > neccessary in [5]. Your comment in the source ('we do not want that') > made me think it is mandatory to have /var/run as dir and I hoped to > learn the reason. 5. The broken do_rootfs still scared me in [6]. 6. > After none of the mails were responded, few days ago I decided to give > your workaround a try, reverted my patch and - surprise - did not get an > error on do_rootfs! So I thought I missed some magic and decided not to > cause further noise on that. So I did some more digging and dumped the contents of all the ipks in deploy and here are the packages (except basefiles) that touch /var/volatile/ bind_9.7.2-P3-r0_armv7a.ipk drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:35 ./var/volatile/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:35 ./var/volatile/run/ lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:35 ./var/run -> volatile/run consolekit_0.4.5-r5_armv7a.ipk lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:06 ./var/log -> volatile/log drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:06 ./var/volatile/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:06 ./var/volatile/log/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:06 ./var/volatile/log/ConsoleKit/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:06 ./var/volatile/run/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:06 ./var/volatile/run/ConsoleKit/ lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:06 ./var/run -> volatile/run samba_3.5.6-r0_armv7a.ipk drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:18 ./etc/default/volatiles/ - -rw-r--r-- root/root 89 2011-10-13 00:17 ./etc/default/volatiles/volatiles.03_samba lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:18 ./var/log -> volatile/log lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:18 ./var/lock -> volatile/lock drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:18 ./var/volatile/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:18 ./var/volatile/log/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:18 ./var/volatile/log/samba/ drwxrwxrwt root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:18 ./var/volatile/lock/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:18 ./var/volatile/run/ lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:18 ./var/run -> volatile/run samba-dbg_3.5.6-r0_armv7a.ipk resolvconf_1.59-r1_all.ipk drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:39 ./var/volatile/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:39 ./var/volatile/run/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:39 ./var/volatile/run/resolvconf/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-10-13 00:39 ./var/volatile/run/resolvconf/interface/ Which makes me think the error message we get is reversed: | * extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from ./var/run to 'volatile/run': File exists. I read that as: 'ln -s /var/run /var/volatile/run', but the packages above have 'ln -s /var/volatile/run /var/run'. Can anyone please tripplecheck my interpretation of the error message? regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFOluRtMkyGM64RGpERAtBuAJ4+TFhhrkNjVL7W6orZ6+10EIgifgCfZOEx axGVAQixLwAzcMTDhrLNB+w= =hr3N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----