All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	Jiang Biao <benbjiang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] sched/fair: select idle cpu from idle cpumask for task wakeup
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 21:20:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jhj1rh6yygz.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201021150335.1103231-1-aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>


On 21/10/20 16:03, Aubrey Li wrote:
> From: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
>
> Added idle cpumask to track idle cpus in sched domain. When a CPU
> enters idle, its corresponding bit in the idle cpumask will be set,
> and when the CPU exits idle, its bit will be cleared.
>
> When a task wakes up to select an idle cpu, scanning idle cpumask
> has low cost than scanning all the cpus in last level cache domain,
> especially when the system is heavily loaded.
>

FWIW I gave this a spin on my arm64 desktop (Ampere eMAG, 32 core). I get
some barely noticeable (AIUI not statistically significant for bench sched)
changes for 100 iterations of:

| bench                              | metric   |   mean |     std |    q90 |    q99 |
|------------------------------------+----------+--------+---------+--------+--------|
| hackbench --loops 5000 --groups 1  | duration | -1.07% |  -2.23% | -0.88% | -0.25% |
| hackbench --loops 5000 --groups 2  | duration | -0.79% | +30.60% | -0.49% | -0.74% |
| hackbench --loops 5000 --groups 4  | duration | -0.54% |  +6.99% | -0.21% | -0.12% |
| perf bench sched pipe -T -l 100000 | ops/sec  | +1.05% |  -2.80% | -0.17% | +0.39% |

q90 & q99 being the 90th and 99th percentile.

Base was tip/sched/core at:
d8fcb81f1acf ("sched/fair: Check for idle core in wake_affine")

> v2->v3:
> - change setting idle cpumask to every idle entry, otherwise schbench
>   has a regression of 99th percentile latency.
> - change clearing idle cpumask to nohz_balancer_kick(), so updating
>   idle cpumask is ratelimited in the idle exiting path.
> - set SCHED_IDLE cpu in idle cpumask to allow it as a wakeup target.
>
> v1->v2:
> - idle cpumask is updated in the nohz routines, by initializing idle
>   cpumask with sched_domain_span(sd), nohz=off case remains the original
>   behavior.
>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> Cc: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@gmail.com>
> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-06 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-21 15:03 [RFC PATCH v3] sched/fair: select idle cpu from idle cpumask for task wakeup Aubrey Li
2020-10-21 17:40 ` kernel test robot
2020-10-22  1:28   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-10-21 18:20 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-03 19:27 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-11-04 11:52   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-06 21:22     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-11-06  7:58 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-11-09  6:05   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-06 21:20 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2020-11-09 13:40   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-09 15:54     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-11-11  8:38       ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-12 10:57 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-12 12:12   ` Li, Aubrey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jhj1rh6yygz.mognet@arm.com \
    --to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benbjiang@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.