From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SxzOg-00032j-1g for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 13:53:26 +0200 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SxzDK-0001MD-Vi for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 13:41:42 +0200 Received: from ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl ([77.162.165.174]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 13:41:42 +0200 Received: from koen by ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 13:41:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 13:41:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1343760977-3290-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <1343760977-3290-6-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH V2 6/7] blacklist.bbclass: Move to meta-angstrom X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 11:53:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 04-08-12 22:47, Khem Raj schreef: > On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Koen Kooi > wrote: >> >> As said before, this class isn't angstrom specific and it won't move >> back to angstrom. > > koen no one else is using it other than angstrom. but it interferes with > similar class from OE-Core I guess oe-core people need to be less anti-social with other layers then and provide migration patches. > so essentially you want to keep a feature thats just used by angstrom in > a non angstrom layer? No, I want the class deleted. But as I keep saying, the class was moved to meta-oe on request because is was most certainly not angstrom specific. And as angstrom maintainer I have no intent to add it back to the angstrom layer. So your commit message is entirely wrong. > doent sound logical to me. Would it be acceptable if angstrom used this > feature from OE-Core as well ? then it will remove the usecase > completely. I keep waiting on the person that pushed it to oe-core to provide patches for distro layers using the old functionality, see above. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFQHlvtMkyGM64RGpERAlM+AJ0QIjUUJazAAA39xptb5OTVbU7GkQCgumJT FFtbzZWd8sI4w3gPZJTLeho= =mlaZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----