From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF27EC433B4 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E5926023D for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:33:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7E5926023D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=emersion.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C659E892BD; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.protonmail.ch (mail1.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.18]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD2A6892BD; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 13:33:16 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emersion.fr; s=protonmail3; t=1621604016; bh=QNLLlNgSg11HgL3zL5CwEIPYTNM7vhxRcygLmBy/KlU=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=E/vVc+1B25XI396wgaGQmly774MA/QKTPuoZhP+21151xdPXNjZPcY+tvsc0YD+Pe ZlwEuEeFlRwTgZBe/w9bTOhgs2xJJgawH8Mal0wN8kFoAm1oNEM362GGAOP8IUUat9 0w9ZVZgJixSi8vb0m5dnYD7dd9j+ckNBMXlUCkIB+zUKNf2n/L+NAGr3143K62Zszv oXpbOnhsutoD0ZnxqX3AbX46xN01xSSfRfrAL8aqH0CorwvfYh5HzK3gExGgVOOIwG bPPaej/GY+VqB/+vEBgT6T9AE6hnRMfSG111H4yJItHAS0rHh/hoVDjFRTxRQDx+bd FiwNcQLM1stnw== To: lyude@redhat.com From: Simon Ser Subject: Re: Freenode fallout Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <143980f8802d0f7de8b106037acce649e219f575.camel@redhat.com> References: <143980f8802d0f7de8b106037acce649e219f575.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Simon Ser Cc: xorg-devel , "mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" , "board@x.org" , members@x.org, dri-devel Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Friday, May 21st, 2021 at 1:49 AM, Lyude Paul wrote: > After considering Libera and OFTC as options, the board settled on > recommending OFTC. The primary reason for this is because OFTC is > associated with our parent foundation SPI, and has a long and well known > history of involvement with the open source community. As well, the > board believes OFTC's current Governance model is a lot more clear then > Libera's. I'd personally prefer Libera Chat. They don't yet have a published formal governance model, but I hope this will come soon. As the former Freenode staff, I trust them to make sure mistakes from the past won't be repeated. Apart from politics, Libera also offers a more modern feature set. This can ease daily usage, with features such as reliable authentication, account tracking, and many other IRC protocol improvements. OFTC has plans to eventually migrate to Solanum, but they don't have the time to do it for now. For reference, on OFTC: CAP LS 302 :kinetic.oftc.net CAP * LS :multi-prefix And on Libera: CAP LS 302 :ruthenium.libera.chat CAP * LS :account-notify away-notify chghost ext= ended-join multi-prefix sasl=3DPLAIN,ECDSA-NIST256P-CHALLENGE,EXTERNAL tls = userhost-in-names account-tag cap-notify echo-message solanum.chat/identify= -msg solanum.chat/realhost