From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7196BE00BF2 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 06:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WelO0-00071z-AJ for yocto@yoctoproject.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:14:20 +0200 Received: from 80-218-32-173.dclient.hispeed.ch ([80.218.32.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:14:20 +0200 Received: from auslands-kv by 80-218-32-173.dclient.hispeed.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:14:20 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: yocto@yoctoproject.org From: Neuer User Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:14:06 +0200 Message-ID: References: <535E5198.60709@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80-218-32-173.dclient.hispeed.ch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: <535E5198.60709@windriver.com> Subject: Re: Kernel config fragments are not applied X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:14:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 28.04.2014 15:03, schrieb Bruce Ashfield: > > The answer to your question depends on the base linux-cubox-i > recipe. > > Config fragment support works for kernels that inherit from linux-yocto, > versus ones that inherit directly from kernel.bbclass. So if you > pop open that base recipe, and look for a reference to linux-yocto.inc, > you'll have the answer. > > It is possible to bbappend the linux-yocto support into the kernel > recipe via your layer, and might be worth a try. > > The separation between the two classes exists to not break compatibility > with existing kernel recipes, or change long standing oe workflow with > the existing classes. > > Cheers, > > Bruce > Ahh, I see. That is probably the reason then. It includes from linux-imx: include recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx.inc Now, should I just forget the fragment idea and use my own defconfig file? Or can I just include linux-yocto.inc in my bbappend?