From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Smirnov Subject: Re: Git drawbacks? Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <32541b130911060849s2d8f13f5sb9b8390f075f8d15@mail.gmail.com> <32541b130911060951q3358ce9ahe28fb0cf902853f2@mail.gmail.com> <8c9a060911090634p4e036208mfb3160eb4c4430e9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 09 17:00:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N7Wf2-00007w-W5 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:00:09 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756381AbZKIP7z (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:59:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756189AbZKIP7z (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:59:55 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:58137 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756111AbZKIP7y (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:59:54 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1N7Wer-0008UC-Fb for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:59:57 +0100 Received: from 212.92.145.7 ([212.92.145.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:59:57 +0100 Received: from divis1969 by 212.92.145.7 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:59:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 212.92.145.7 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.27 Safari/532.0) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jacob Helwig gmail.com> writes: > It does have a few caveats, however. If you have the same branch > checked out in two different working copies created using >... > place on your machine, you'll never notice, thuogh. So, i cannot recover from this situation by upmerging to the new head?