From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Danny Piccirillo <danny.piccirillo@member.fsf.org>
Subject: Re: Honest timeline for btrfsck
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:15:41 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <loom.20120328T080446-49@post.gmane.org>
References: <CAGh96GFhVEfXt=xcb-uGEBA3Ss2fc8BwOpJ2g8tXbm+VimdH3Q@mail.gmail.com> <1312404713-sup-6548@shiny> <loom.20110818T030824-742@post.gmane.org> <1313700115-sup-2457@shiny> <jf42r4$fua$1@dough.gmane.org> <20120118011357.GO3658@shiny>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

Chris Mason <chris.mason <at> oracle.com> writes:
> 
> People have already started picking up #4, fujitsu had some patches in
> this direction that we'll keep developing with.
> 
> I stepped back to add some directory metadata fixups as well to the
> basic fsck tool.  I had thought I could easily do it all from the
> kernel, but sometimes the userland side really is easier.


Phoronix reported on your talk at the SCALE 10x conference here 
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0Njk


What happened to the February 14th deadline? Is another rewrite 
underway? I think the biggest thing that can be done in lieu of the release
is really good communication. There's no feed to get up-to-date info on 
what's being worked on, what's left, etc. 


Looking forward to this! 
.danny