From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Greenleaf Subject: Re: git stash deletes/drops changes of Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 15:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87sj1d5ous.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net> <7vd2shcnx7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <87obc15mq5.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net> <7v4ndtcmh0.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 24 17:34:53 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufu13-0003UU-6C for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 17:34:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755907Ab3EXPep (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2013 11:34:45 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59807 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755830Ab3EXPeo (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2013 11:34:44 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufu0v-0003PO-LE for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 17:34:41 +0200 Received: from 112.205.196.58.pldt.net ([112.205.196.58.pldt.net]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 17:34:41 +0200 Received: from james.a.greenleaf by 112.205.196.58.pldt.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 17:34:41 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 112.205.196.58 (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.93 Safari/537.36) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Phil Hord gmail.com> writes: > The wording of --ignore-changes suffers the same lack of clarity that > --assume-unchanged does. > What's better? --sequester is probably too obscure. Maybe --hold. > Or --silence. Or --shut-up. How about --freeze?