From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Tran Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] test-lib: '--run' to run only specific tests Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1395650987-5960-1-git-send-email-ilya.bobyr@gmail.com> <1395916370-1404-1-git-send-email-ilya.bobyr@gmail.com> <1395916370-1404-4-git-send-email-ilya.bobyr@gmail.com> <53351F26.9070007@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 31 21:35:38 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WUhzZ-0006WU-Gh for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:35:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751452AbaCaTf0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:35:26 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48091 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750925AbaCaTfZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:35:25 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WUhzN-0005g4-Gu for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:35:21 +0200 Received: from 50-23-65-34.revip2.marketstreetwifi.net ([50.23.65.34]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:35:21 +0200 Received: from unsignedzero by 50-23-65-34.revip2.marketstreetwifi.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:35:21 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 50.23.65.34 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.1.0.0 Safari/537.36) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > Junio C Hamano pobox.com> writes: > > > I would have to say that there is already an established pattern to > pick ranges that normal people understand well and it would be silly > to invent another more verbose way to express the same thing. You > tell your Print Dialog which page to print with e.g. "-4,7,9-12,15-", > not ">=4 7 ...". > > Would the same notation be insufficient for our purpose? You do not > even have to worry about negation that way. > That will do, especially if the numbers are in ascending order. We won't have the odd cases of including a test and removing it later on. I think we won't need a --neg flag to take the negation of the tests in that range?