From: Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs performance, sudden drop to 0 IOPs
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 07:58:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lpmoqb-t9q.ln1@hurikhan77.spdns.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CABdHLQ7baX58W1UnkYUo0_g3f+0dhAs5QuBCDA3U4sduRkTv5g@mail.gmail.com
P. Remek <p.remek1@googlemail.com> schrieb:
> Not sure if it helps, but here is it:
>
> root@lab1:/mnt/vol1# btrfs filesystem df /mnt/vol1/
> Data, RAID10: total=116.00GiB, used=110.03GiB
> Data, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00
> System, RAID1: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
> System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00
> Metadata, RAID1: total=2.00GiB, used=563.72MiB
> Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00
> unknown, single: total=192.00MiB, used=0.00
This looks completely different to my output. Do you use the latest btrfs-
progs?
$ btrfs --version
Btrfs v3.18.2
$ btrfs fi us /
Overall:
Device size: 2.71TiB
Device allocated: 1.50TiB
Device unallocated: 1.21TiB
Used: 1.37TiB
Free (estimated): 1.33TiB (min: 745.87GiB)
Data ratio: 1.00
Metadata ratio: 2.00
Global reserve: 512.00MiB (used: 0.00B)
Data,RAID0: Size:1.49TiB, Used:1.36TiB
/dev/bcache0 507.00GiB
/dev/bcache1 507.00GiB
/dev/bcache2 507.00GiB
Metadata,RAID1: Size:6.00GiB, Used:3.99GiB
/dev/bcache0 4.00GiB
/dev/bcache1 4.00GiB
/dev/bcache2 4.00GiB
System,RAID1: Size:32.00MiB, Used:100.00KiB
/dev/bcache1 32.00MiB
/dev/bcache2 32.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/bcache0 414.51GiB
/dev/bcache1 414.48GiB
/dev/bcache2 414.48GiB
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@gmail.com> wrote:
>> P. Remek <p.remek1@googlemail.com> schrieb:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am benchmarking Btrfs and when benchmarking random writes with fio
>>> utility, I noticed following two things:
>>>
>>> 1) On first run when target file doesn't exist yet, perfromance is
>>> about 8000 IOPs. On second, and every other run, performance goes up
>>> to 70000 IOPs. Its massive difference. The target file is the one
>>> created during the first run.
>>>
>>> 2) There are windows during the test where IOPs drop to 0 and stay 0
>>> about 10 seconds and then it goes back again, and after couple of
>>> seconds again to 0. This is reproducible 100% times.
>>>
>>> Can somobody shred some light on what's happening?
>>
>> I'm not an expert or dev but it's probably due to btrfs doing some
>> housekeeping under the hood. Could you check the output of "btrfs
>> filesystem usage /mountpoint" while running the test? I'd guess there's
>> some pressure on the global reserve during those times.
>>
>>> Command: fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1
>>> --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test9 --filename=test9 --bs=4k --iodepth=256
>>> --size=10G --numjobs=1 --readwrite=randwrite
>>>
>>> Environment:
>>> CPU: dual socket: E5-2630 v2
>>> RAM: 32 GB ram
>>> OS: Ubuntu server 14.10
>>> Kernel: 3.19.0-031900rc2-generic
>>> btrfs tools: Btrfs v3.14.1
>>> 2x LSI 9300 HBAs - SAS3 12/Gbs
>>> 8x SSD Ultrastar SSD1600MM 400GB SAS3 12/Gbs
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Premek
>>
>> --
>> Replies to list only preferred.
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Replies to list only preferred.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-10 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-09 17:26 btrfs performance, sudden drop to 0 IOPs P. Remek
2015-02-09 19:56 ` Kai Krakow
2015-02-09 22:21 ` P. Remek
2015-02-10 6:58 ` Kai Krakow [this message]
2015-02-10 4:42 ` Duncan
2015-02-10 17:44 ` P. Remek
2015-02-12 2:10 ` Duncan
2015-02-12 4:33 ` Kai Krakow
2015-02-12 12:21 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-02-12 19:42 ` Kai Krakow
2015-02-13 13:16 ` P. Remek
2015-02-13 18:26 ` Kai Krakow
2015-02-13 13:08 ` P. Remek
2015-02-13 2:46 ` Liu Bo
2015-02-13 3:55 ` Wang Shilong
2015-02-13 13:18 ` P. Remek
2015-02-11 12:40 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-02-12 4:59 ` Liu Bo
2015-02-13 13:06 ` P. Remek
2015-02-13 14:08 ` Liu Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=lpmoqb-t9q.ln1@hurikhan77.spdns.de \
--to=hurikhan77@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.