From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753809AbaHDRQz (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:16:55 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:56458 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751713AbaHDQty (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2014 12:49:54 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Gu Zheng" , "Li Zefan" , "Tejun Heo" Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 17:48:31 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.2 14/94] cpuset,mempolicy: fix sleeping function called from invalid context In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.249 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.2.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Gu Zheng commit 391acf970d21219a2a5446282d3b20eace0c0d7a upstream. When runing with the kernel(3.15-rc7+), the follow bug occurs: [ 9969.258987] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:586 [ 9969.359906] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 160655, name: python [ 9969.441175] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 9969.488184] CPU: 26 PID: 160655 Comm: python Tainted: G A 3.15.0-rc7+ #85 [ 9969.581032] Hardware name: FUJITSU-SV PRIMEQUEST 1800E/SB, BIOS PRIMEQUEST 1000 Series BIOS Version 1.39 11/16/2012 [ 9969.706052] ffffffff81a20e60 ffff8803e941fbd0 ffffffff8162f523 ffff8803e941fd18 [ 9969.795323] ffff8803e941fbe0 ffffffff8109995a ffff8803e941fc58 ffffffff81633e6c [ 9969.884710] ffffffff811ba5dc ffff880405c6b480 ffff88041fdd90a0 0000000000002000 [ 9969.974071] Call Trace: [ 9970.003403] [] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66 [ 9970.065074] [] __might_sleep+0xfa/0x130 [ 9970.130743] [] mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x4f0 [ 9970.200638] [] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1bc/0x210 [ 9970.272610] [] cpuset_mems_allowed+0x27/0x140 [ 9970.344584] [] ? __mpol_dup+0x63/0x150 [ 9970.409282] [] __mpol_dup+0xe5/0x150 [ 9970.471897] [] ? __mpol_dup+0x63/0x150 [ 9970.536585] [] ? copy_process.part.23+0x606/0x1d40 [ 9970.613763] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [ 9970.683660] [] ? monotonic_to_bootbased+0x2f/0x50 [ 9970.759795] [] copy_process.part.23+0x670/0x1d40 [ 9970.834885] [] do_fork+0xd8/0x380 [ 9970.894375] [] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0x9c/0xf0 [ 9970.969470] [] SyS_clone+0x16/0x20 [ 9971.030011] [] stub_clone+0x69/0x90 [ 9971.091573] [] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b The cause is that cpuset_mems_allowed() try to take mutex_lock(&callback_mutex) under the rcu_read_lock(which was hold in __mpol_dup()). And in cpuset_mems_allowed(), the access to cpuset is under rcu_read_lock, so in __mpol_dup, we can reduce the rcu_read_lock protection region to protect the access to cpuset only in current_cpuset_is_being_rebound(). So that we can avoid this bug. This patch is a temporary solution that just addresses the bug mentioned above, can not fix the long-standing issue about cpuset.mems rebinding on fork(): "When the forker's task_struct is duplicated (which includes ->mems_allowed) and it races with an update to cpuset_being_rebound in update_tasks_nodemask() then the task's mems_allowed doesn't get updated. And the child task's mems_allowed can be wrong if the cpuset's nodemask changes before the child has been added to the cgroup's tasklist." Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng Acked-by: Li Zefan Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- kernel/cpuset.c | 8 +++++++- mm/mempolicy.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/cpuset.c +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c @@ -1152,7 +1152,13 @@ done: int current_cpuset_is_being_rebound(void) { - return task_cs(current) == cpuset_being_rebound; + int ret; + + rcu_read_lock(); + ret = task_cs(current) == cpuset_being_rebound; + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return ret; } static int update_relax_domain_level(struct cpuset *cs, s64 val) --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -1983,7 +1983,6 @@ struct mempolicy *__mpol_dup(struct memp } else *new = *old; - rcu_read_lock(); if (current_cpuset_is_being_rebound()) { nodemask_t mems = cpuset_mems_allowed(current); if (new->flags & MPOL_F_REBINDING) @@ -1991,7 +1990,6 @@ struct mempolicy *__mpol_dup(struct memp else mpol_rebind_policy(new, &mems, MPOL_REBIND_ONCE); } - rcu_read_unlock(); atomic_set(&new->refcnt, 1); return new; }