From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755580AbdBOXj3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:39:29 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:54272 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755471AbdBOXj1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:39:27 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "John Dias" , Di@decadent.org.uk, "Thomas Gleixner" , "Vince Weaver" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Jiri Olsa" , "Stephane Eranian" , "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" , "Kees Cook" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Peter Zijlstra" , "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" , "Min Chong" , "Alexander Shishkin" Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:41:34 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.2 114/126] perf/core: Fix concurrent sys_perf_event_open() vs. 'move_group' race In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a02:8011:400e:2:6f00:88c8:c921:d332 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.2.85-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Peter Zijlstra commit 321027c1fe77f892f4ea07846aeae08cefbbb290 upstream. Di Shen reported a race between two concurrent sys_perf_event_open() calls where both try and move the same pre-existing software group into a hardware context. The problem is exactly that described in commit: f63a8daa5812 ("perf: Fix event->ctx locking") ... where, while we wait for a ctx->mutex acquisition, the event->ctx relation can have changed under us. That very same commit failed to recognise sys_perf_event_context() as an external access vector to the events and thereby didn't apply the established locking rules correctly. So while one sys_perf_event_open() call is stuck waiting on mutex_lock_double(), the other (which owns said locks) moves the group about. So by the time the former sys_perf_event_open() acquires the locks, the context we've acquired is stale (and possibly dead). Apply the established locking rules as per perf_event_ctx_lock_nested() to the mutex_lock_double() for the 'move_group' case. This obviously means we need to validate state after we acquire the locks. Reported-by: Di Shen (Keen Lab) Tested-by: John Dias Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Min Chong Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Fixes: f63a8daa5812 ("perf: Fix event->ctx locking") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170106131444.GZ3174@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar [bwh: Backported to 3.2: - Use ACCESS_ONCE() instead of READ_ONCE() - Test perf_event::group_flags instead of group_caps - Add the err_locked cleanup block, which we didn't need before - Adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- kernel/events/core.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -6474,6 +6474,37 @@ static void mutex_lock_double(struct mut mutex_lock_nested(b, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); } +/* + * Variation on perf_event_ctx_lock_nested(), except we take two context + * mutexes. + */ +static struct perf_event_context * +__perf_event_ctx_lock_double(struct perf_event *group_leader, + struct perf_event_context *ctx) +{ + struct perf_event_context *gctx; + +again: + rcu_read_lock(); + gctx = ACCESS_ONCE(group_leader->ctx); + if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&gctx->refcount)) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + goto again; + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + + mutex_lock_double(&gctx->mutex, &ctx->mutex); + + if (group_leader->ctx != gctx) { + mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex); + mutex_unlock(&gctx->mutex); + put_ctx(gctx); + goto again; + } + + return gctx; +} + /** * sys_perf_event_open - open a performance event, associate it to a task/cpu * @@ -6661,14 +6692,31 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, } if (move_group) { - gctx = group_leader->ctx; + gctx = __perf_event_ctx_lock_double(group_leader, ctx); + + /* + * Check if we raced against another sys_perf_event_open() call + * moving the software group underneath us. + */ + if (!(group_leader->group_flags & PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE)) { + /* + * If someone moved the group out from under us, check + * if this new event wound up on the same ctx, if so + * its the regular !move_group case, otherwise fail. + */ + if (gctx != ctx) { + err = -EINVAL; + goto err_locked; + } else { + perf_event_ctx_unlock(group_leader, gctx); + move_group = 0; + } + } /* * See perf_event_ctx_lock() for comments on the details * of swizzling perf_event::ctx. */ - mutex_lock_double(&gctx->mutex, &ctx->mutex); - perf_remove_from_context(group_leader, false); /* @@ -6709,10 +6757,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, ++ctx->generation; perf_unpin_context(ctx); - if (move_group) { - mutex_unlock(&gctx->mutex); - put_ctx(gctx); - } + if (move_group) + perf_event_ctx_unlock(group_leader, gctx); mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex); event->owner = current; @@ -6737,6 +6783,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, fd_install(event_fd, event_file); return event_fd; +err_locked: + if (move_group) + perf_event_ctx_unlock(group_leader, gctx); + mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex); + fput(event_file); err_context: perf_unpin_context(ctx); put_ctx(ctx);