From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933561AbdKGAR3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2017 19:17:29 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:53678 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933545AbdKGAR0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2017 19:17:26 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Tejun Heo" , "Dan Carpenter" Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 23:03:02 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 033/294] libata: array underflow in ata_find_dev() In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a02:8011:400e:2:6f00:88c8:c921:d332 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.50-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dan Carpenter commit 59a5e266c3f5c1567508888dd61a45b86daed0fa upstream. My static checker complains that "devno" can be negative, meaning that we read before the start of the loop. I've looked at the code, and I think the warning is right. This come from /proc so it's root only or it would be quite a quite a serious bug. The call tree looks like this: proc_scsi_write() <- gets id and channel from simple_strtoul() -> scsi_add_single_device() <- calls shost->transportt->user_scan() -> ata_scsi_user_scan() -> ata_find_dev() Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c @@ -2796,10 +2796,12 @@ static unsigned int atapi_xlat(struct at static struct ata_device *ata_find_dev(struct ata_port *ap, int devno) { if (!sata_pmp_attached(ap)) { - if (likely(devno < ata_link_max_devices(&ap->link))) + if (likely(devno >= 0 && + devno < ata_link_max_devices(&ap->link))) return &ap->link.device[devno]; } else { - if (likely(devno < ap->nr_pmp_links)) + if (likely(devno >= 0 && + devno < ap->nr_pmp_links)) return &ap->pmp_link[devno].device[0]; }