From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing control. Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:53:16 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1263568754.23480.142.camel@bigi> <1266875729.3673.12.camel@bigi> <1266931623.3973.643.camel@bigi> <1266934817.3973.654.camel@bigi> <1266966581.3973.675.camel@bigi> <20100225214656.GS3604@count0.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, Daniel Lezcano , Patrick McHardy , Linux Netdev List , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Netfilter Development Mailinglist , Ben Greear , Serge Hallyn To: Matt Helsley Return-path: Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:50557 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759391Ab0BZAx0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:53:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100225214656.GS3604@count0.beaverton.ibm.com> (Matt Helsley's message of "Thu\, 25 Feb 2010 13\:46\:56 -0800") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Matt Helsley writes: > Seems like an ok concept to me. Did you try doing this with > anon_inodes and bind mounting the /proc//fd/N as above to keep > them alive and name them? Of course this part doesn't work in my patch because I have the wrong mnt_ns on my mount MS_NOUSER on my superblock. MS_NOUSER is easy to get past. Getting a vfsmount in the proper mnt namespace could be tricky. Eric