From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] security/selinux: fix /proc/sys/ labeling
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:14:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1k4hjqzql.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik+N5J-MDrbMbtwRPwz==J4y8sbBkhir=1K3g=B@mail.gmail.com> (Lucian Adrian Grijincu's message of "Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:46:42 +0200")
Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>> What kernel has a dentry_path_raw? Perhaps you mean __dentry_path?
>
>
> See the function here:
> https://github.com/mirrors/linux-2.6/blob/70d1f365568e0cdbc9f4ab92428e1830fdb09ab0/fs/dcache.c
>
> The last patches were against 2.6.38-rc2 because the dcache layer got
> rewritten in 2.6.38 http://lwn.net/Articles/421784/
>
> __dentry_path is now static (in fs/dcache.c) and does not take the
> necessary locks.
Thanks. I thought I was looking at the latest source but it turns out
I fat fingered something and my tree was still 2.6.36-rc3. Sigh.
dentry_path_raw does seem reasonable.
Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-01 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-01 0:17 [PATCH] security/selinux: fix /proc/sys/ labeling Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 1:32 ` [PATCH] security: remove unused security_sysctl hook Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 15:02 ` [PATCH] security/selinux: fix /proc/sys/ labeling Stephen Smalley
2011-02-01 15:53 ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 15:59 ` Stephen Smalley
2011-02-01 16:32 ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 16:37 ` Stephen Smalley
2011-02-01 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] security: remove unused security_sysctl hook Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 19:05 ` Stephen Smalley
2011-02-01 20:06 ` Eric Paris
2011-02-14 19:33 ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-14 19:53 ` Eric Paris
2011-02-14 20:06 ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-14 22:06 ` James Morris
2011-02-01 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] security/selinux: fix /proc/sys/ labeling Stephen Smalley
2011-02-01 19:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-01 19:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-01 19:46 ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 20:14 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1k4hjqzql.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucian.grijincu@gmail.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.